Re: [linux-audio-user] (semi)professional "field" recording work, what to use?

Your results are going to depend upon what you mean by "good quality" and "further process". As you know, MD uses lossy encoding, with resulting artifacts that range from imperceptible to rather annoying, depending upon the type of programme material. If you haven't used them much for recording, however, you may not realise how quickly the (decoded into linear PCM) audio falls apart with further processing. You can get away with gain, as it doesn't involve much "processing"; and filtering will be acceptable if the filter is very broadband. But mixing several coded signals, performing heavy EQ, or re-coding will NOT result in pleasant sounds. Even the high-rate coders that allow recoding suffer some loss, and require higher rates. (Basically, that's what makes them allow re-coding.) For your budget and programme material, I would suggest a laptop with a decent audio interface. I use the HDSP Cardbus (usually with external converters, but the ones in the Multiface are actually pretty decent); but folks on this list (as well as the Alsa, Ardour, and Jamin development lists) are happily using other external interfaces. I think you'll be pretty happy with the performance and stability of JACK with a low-latency kernel and an external Firewire drive for your audio. -- Roger Williams <raw(a)qux.com> Qux Tool & Die, Middleborough, Massachusetts // Omne tulit punctum qui misquit utile dulci //