8 Apr
2016
8 Apr
'16
2:13 p.m.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:58:54 -1000
david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
On 04/07/2016 01:40 AM, jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com wrote:
> Otherwise it is like taking pictures using an
expensive camera and
> having the film developed at the drugstore.
Seriously, I've done that and gotten pretty good
development from the
drugstore. All depends on how new their development system is and how
good their techs maintain it. ;)
There are no set rules. I remember taking stunningly nice (colours,
feeling, etc...) pictures with a throw-away camera. The actual
cheeziness of the device brought a very nice touch. That was 3
pictures out of the device that were so. The others were crap, but
nevertheless.
So then, the usage of all these fancy electrons mean nothing :)