17 Aug
2017
17 Aug
'17
10:10 p.m.
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:48:18 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Fons Adriaensen
wrote:
Why should somebody suggest new defaults? The values could be
adjusted, if required and QjackCtl provided most jack parameters, if not
all in a single tab, before it was split into two tabs. Much
likely LTS release distros still provide the old version of QjackCtl,
let alone that jack's defaults provided by package maintainers could
vary, I've seen configurations with --clients=foo
--ports-per-application=bar.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 01:59:29PM -0400, Paul
Davis wrote:
I've never adjusted any of the parameters that are now on that tab in
more than a decade.
There has never been a pull request or a bug report suggesting new
defaults. parameters which were never really meant to be
exposed to users
then the at least the defaults should be OK. They usually are not.