5 Sep
2016
5 Sep
'16
2:59 p.m.
Le 5 septembre 2016 09:58:09 UTC+03:00, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> a
écrit :
On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 09:09:47 +0300, Thierry
Andriamirado wrote:
Generaly speaking, I agree..
But believe me: with the same mic, same position, distance and angle, the sound recorded
with my SB Live seems so "cold". I +never+ could get the sound I had in my
head.
I mean I need a good preamp which keeps my guitar
+ amp + SM57 's
characters.
recording electric guitars with a dynamic mic is ok, but IMO even not
good preamps keep the characters, IOW recording electric guitars with
a microphone usually works good with less good equipment, too. The quality of the device you recommend might be good, I
don't know, but to
prove the quality of the device by electric guitar amp recordings with
a
dynamic mic IMO isn't trusty.
Recording via "Dynamic mic" is trusty (and recquired!) for some guys and I'm
one of them. Because it's a bit like a stompbox effect. I mean, if you know the
hardware, you expect it to deliver a particular sound.
As a live performer, I knew how to position my dynamic mic. I tried some audio interfaces
which sounded better than the SB Live, obviously. But the NI K6 really surprised me.
That's what I meant.
Sometimes I record 2 channels: first one = amp + SM57. Second one = dry signal from a
bypassed stereo stomp box, for reamping purposes with guitarix. This "dry" sound
always sound good! Which, once again seemed to be impossible before I bought the K6.
Another example: I used it to record from a dying MiniDisc (no more spdif etc..), so at
Line level: it sounded good and even kept the "coldness" (?) of the Minidisk. I
mean: the K6 didn't add any unwanted coloration.
Now I'm not saying it's the best audio interface: it's a surprisingly cheap
but very good itf working with Linux.
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.