16 Mar
2010
16 Mar
'10
2:53 p.m.
On 3/16/10, drew Roberts <zotz(a)100jamz.com> wrote:
On Monday 15 March 2010 15:26:14 sevol wrote:
Not such a good one then.
Sure, no one would likely want mine either, but someone's fixes might
improve
things.
all the best,
drew
_______________________________________________
Totally, I think at least the idea of the site has great
possibilities, & hopefully, the accuracy of info will get better as
time goes on.
As for the license, I think some of your comments from other threads
on LAU have made me more aware of all the variant CC licenses, but
generally it's not something I go out of my way to look at in much
detail. Perhaps I should more often.
thanks,
-s
Which CC
License? If a good one, couldn't fixes be sent along?
It says: Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic.
But understand, nobody in their right mind would want my fixes. O_o