On 08/04/2011 11:59 PM, rosea grammostola wrote:
Unbelievable that we are missing the chances
here.
That's no wonder. You'll probably agree with me that there are like 4
or 5 people using Linux audio on a serious basis in the Netherlands.
The Netherlands has 16,7 million inhabitants, worldwide there are 6,9
billion souls so some maths yields: (5 / 16.700.000) * 6.900.000.000 =
2066 serious Linux audio users world wide. If this would be a
realistic figure we have a long way to go, it is just a too small user
base.
My 2¢: social media don't work for Linux Audio. I think the only thing
that does work is good video tutorials, that's really big at the
moment, good blogs and decent articles on authorative sites and in
printed magazines. All the other things are imho not useful. Twitter,
Facebook, Google+ won't work, simply too much dispersion, people don't
collaborate on these platforms, they only click on buttons and leave
pointless comments. My girlfriend just bought me the latest Linux
Format and the only audio related article it contains is an article by
Jono Bacon who recommends using Jokosher. Ok, it's about podcasting
but we can do better than that! There are so many people making music
with their computers and still Linux is considered not a viable option
because it's supposedly for geeks, nerds and technically savvy folks.
I call BS, with the band I convinced the others to ditch Cubase in
favor of Qtractor because every rehearsal session we were totally lost
again on how to record a simple track. And it takes me longer to
properly configure a Windows machine than a Linux one for audio usage.
People need to open up and look further than what they get crammed in
their mouths. And some others on the list have said it before, musical
breakthroughs don't always come from talented artists but also from
people who do things differently. Who cut up speaker cones to get a
distorted sound
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guitar_distortion#History), who
experiment with multitrack recording while it doesn't even properly
exist (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitrack_recording#Process) or
who start using autotuners as an effect
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autotune#In_popular_music). And you know
what? Linux Audio is the perfect starting point imo for doing things
differently, not only because it is different but also because it's
completely free. And that's what musicians might appeal in the near
future, sheer freedom. Within 50 years the record labels have managed
to destroy their own businesses simply by taking away the musician's
freedom, it's a matter of years before musicians start to follow the
examples of Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails and regain their freedom. So
yes, we have to play that political card, the time is right, more and
more people are considering FLOSS as a viable option (that includes
Neelie Kroes, the EU Commissioner for Digital Agenda:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neelie_Kroes#Commissioner_for_Digital_Agenda)
and those are not just the people buying biological food or pieces of
land in the Amazon to reduce their ecological footprint.
And what we really need is quality stuff, quality music, quality
videos, quality live stuff. There is waaaaaaaay too little available
at the moment while it is perfectly possible to create quality music
with Linux. We need more Ken Restivo's, more Sebkha Chott's, more
Louigi Verona's (and any other talent hanging around here that I might
forget, sorry beforehand). We need a buzz, a technique, a workflow
that yields something unique that makes people wonder how it was done,
that makes people crave to reproduce that uniqueness so they can start
destroying it again ;)
Wow, you took your time! :)
I agree for 98% with you. But don't you think that we should do both? I
am not talking about a advertising campaign, but don't you think that a
active Ardour account on social media could help to make people aware of
the possibilities of Ardour and Linux for music production in general?
It's a nice way to inform people about the plans and progress of Ardour
3 for instance. MuseScore is proven that it works as we speak.
/Wat een boer niet kent/, /dat/ eet hij /niet/!* :)
\r
*