14 Aug
2011
14 Aug
'11
7:55 p.m.
Hi,
I like to experiment with netjack, using two computers connected with a
crossover cable.
Do I need anything more then just putting the crossover cable in both
computers? :)
jack_netsource -H <slave jack hostname>
What is that <slave jack hostname> and how to find it?
Looking for some pointers...
\r
14 Aug
14 Aug
7:58 p.m.
Rosea!
How do you reach your slave computer from the master computer, say by ping
or ssh? That adress is the slave host. It's simple networking stuff.
Regards
Julien
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Such Is Life: Very Intensely Adorable;
Frightening Absence Just Arriving, Reigns Disappeared, Ornate - flowers!
====== Find my music at ======
http://juliencoder.de/nama/music.html
.....................................
"If you live to be 100, I hope I live to be 100 minus 1 day,
so I never have to live without you." (Winnie the Pooh)
8:10 p.m.
On 08/14/2011 09:59 PM, Julien Claassen wrote:
Rosea!
How do you reach your slave computer from the master computer, say
by ping or ssh? That adress is the slave host. It's simple networking
stuff.
People told me that it's not possible to use openssh over a crossover
cable... It's no simple networking stuff apparently. Maybe I should
explore that first, how to make connection via crossover cable (without
JACK).
\r
9 p.m.
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:10:51 +0200
rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/14/2011 09:59 PM, Julien Claassen wrote:
You shouldn't listen to those people - I do it all the time.
Rosea!
How do you reach your slave computer from the master computer, say
by ping or ssh? That adress is the slave host. It's simple networking
stuff.
People told me that it's not possible to use openssh over a crossover
cable... It's no simple networking stuff apparently. Maybe
I should
explore that first, how to make connection via crossover cable (without
JACK).
Actually, it *is* simple networking stuff, but it sounds like you don't
have the background for that. You have to know how to set IP addresses
manually, and a tiny bit about subnetting.
It will be much easier to set up the second machine the way you'd set
up any other machine, using a router that has a DHCP server to assign
the IP address and default route, etc. Even if for some reason you don't
have the machines you're playing with connected to a network, it'll still
be much easier doing this with a cheap router.
--
======================================================================
Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh(a)brainiac.com
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
9:11 p.m.
On 08/14/2011 11:00 PM, Joe Hartley wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:10:51 +0200
rosea grammostola<rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Should netjack work with the same performance on a wireless connection,
compared to wired connection?
\r
On 08/14/2011 09:59 PM, Julien Claassen wrote:
You shouldn't listen to those people - I do it all the time.
Rosea!
How do you reach your slave computer from the master computer, say
by ping or ssh? That adress is the slave host. It's simple networking
stuff.
People told me that it's not possible to use openssh over a crossover
cable... It's no simple networking stuff apparently.
Maybe I should
explore that first, how to make connection via crossover cable (without
JACK).
Actually, it *is* simple networking stuff, but it sounds like you
don't
have the background for that. You have to know how to set IP addresses
manually, and a tiny bit about subnetting.
It will be much easier to set up the second machine the way you'd set
up any other machine, using a router that has a DHCP server to assign
the IP address and default route, etc. Even if for some reason you don't
have the machines you're playing with connected to a network, it'll still
be much easier doing this with a cheap router.
9:25 p.m.
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:11:46 +0200
rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Should netjack work with the same performance on a
wireless connection,
compared to wired connection?
The short answer is no, but the more correct answer is that depending on
how much data you want to push over the connection, and how much latency
is tolerable for what you're doing. Wireless these days has quite a bit
of bandwidth; you may not saturate the connection.
--
======================================================================
Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh(a)brainiac.com
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
9:48 p.m.
On 08/14/2011 11:25 PM, Joe Hartley wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:11:46 +0200
rosea grammostola<rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Anyway, got it working via the crossover cable.
on Master machine:
sudo ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.2 up
on Slave machine
sudo ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.3 up
On Master machine
jack_netsource -H 10.0.0.3
For the rest: http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/User/NetJack
Thanks!
\r
Should netjack work with the same performance on
a wireless connection,
compared to wired connection?
The short answer is no, but the more correct answer
is that depending on
how much data you want to push over the connection, and how much latency
is tolerable for what you're doing. Wireless these days has quite a bit
of bandwidth; you may not saturate the connection.
4645
days inactive
4645
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Joe Hartley -
Julien Claassen -
rosea grammostola