Rocco <linuxmedia4(a)netscape.net> wrote: atte(a)ballbreaker.dk wrote: If You're suggesting that "smurf" wont edit a sample because "swami" doesn't (because smurf is an earlier version of swami), then I can't agree with that. I started using smurf because (whatever version) of swami (that I was using at that time) wouldn't let Me do something that I wanted to do (I can't remember what it was that I was attempting to do) but smurf would let me do whatever it was that I was attempting to do. Whatever smurf allowed Me to do (that swami wouldn't) was important. I think it had to do with loading or saving a sound font. So, if I'm not mistaken about that, then it's not so hard to beleive that smurf will allow for a sample to be edited. BTW.. I use smurf Version 0.52.6 Rocco

Atte André Jensen wrote: i have never used swami myself (i'm not into sampling and keyboards in general), but i've seen it demonstrated at linuxtag, it's cool. and the author, josh green, is a very nice guy! give it a try. -- Progress (n.): The process through which the Internet has evolved from smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of smart terminals. - stolen from Steve Meuse's sig Jörn Nettingsmeier Kurfürstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server) http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/ (Linux Audio Developers)