21 Mar
2013
21 Mar
'13
4:59 p.m.
Hi,
I'm looking for something which I can use together with my 88keys
masterkeyb without knobs. It would be nice if it's small and light
enough to put on my keyboard itself. Something like the evolution uc-16,
but it would be nice if I could route my midi masterkeybd via the
controller to the computer (midi in / midi out / midi thru (?).
I like to control stuff like setBfree and some effects in Non-Mixer
probably.
Thanks in advance,
\r
21 Mar
21 Mar
5:08 p.m.
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 16:58 +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
it would be nice if I could route my midi masterkeybd
via the
controller to the computer (midi in / midi out / midi thru (?)
For what reason will you add MIDI thru latency to the keyboard output?
Keyboard -> controller -> computer?
In this case the controller anyway wouldn't directly control the
keyboard, just the computer, but you would get MIDI thru latency.
I own a KORG nanoKONTROL old version and it can be used with an USB
extension cable. Ok, then there are two instead of one cable from your
keyboard to the computer, simply use zipties to bundle the two cables, I
don't think it will cause issues.
2 Cents,
Ralf
5:20 p.m.
PPS: My apologise, I assume that a "master keyboard" won't benefit from
options such a device could provide, e.g. splitting the keyboard etc.
should be able by the master keyboard, such as sending a CC to switch a
new setup for such an additional MIDI device. I always would avoid MIDI
thru for a master keyboard and prefer several cables from and to the
computer instead.
5:10 p.m.
I know you won't something as the nanoKONTROL, I'm only speaking about
the disadvantage of MIDI thru ;).
5:57 p.m.
On 21/03/13 15:58, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for something which I can use together with my 88keys
masterkeyb without knobs. It would be nice if it's small and light
enough to put on my keyboard itself. Something like the evolution uc-16,
but it would be nice if I could route my midi masterkeybd via the
controller to the computer (midi in / midi out / midi thru (?).
I like to control stuff like setBfree and some effects in Non-Mixer
probably.
Thanks in advance,
\r
I got a Korg nanoKONTROL to control Native Instruments's B4II -- it's
perfect as it has nine channels, each with a knob, fader and two buttons
which is just right for controlling a Hammond's drawbars.
I mapped the buttons to various things like keyclick on and off,
vibrato/chorus on/off etc and knobs to chorus/vibrato settings, keyclick
level etc.
The Nanos sit nicely atop my M-Audio Keystation 88as they are slim and
have little rubber feet so they don't slide around. They don't have
in/out/through though, just midi out over USB.
Korg, in their "wisdom", made the nanoKONTROL2 only eight channels
though. Perhaps that will be sufficient for you, or perhaps you might
find a used one on eBay.
However, I recently came across a copy of the original nanoKONTROL
called the Icon iControls:
http://www.dv247.com/computer-hardware/icon-i-controls-usb-midi-controller-…
Thomann stock other Icon products but don't seem to have that particular
one.
Q
7:58 p.m.
On 03/21/2013 04:58 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for something which I can use together with my 88keys
masterkeyb without knobs. It would be nice if it's small and light
enough to put on my keyboard itself. Something like the evolution uc-16,
but it would be nice if I could route my midi masterkeybd via the
controller to the computer (midi in / midi out / midi thru (?).
I like to control stuff like setBfree and some effects in Non-Mixer
probably.
Thanks in advance,
\r
Korg nanoKONTROL and an USB MIDI cable. Connect the MIDI OUT and IN of
your keyboard with the USB MIDI cable, connect your nanoKONTROL and off
you go :) I just received an USB MIDI cable from DealExtreme. Works OOTB
and was only $6 and no shipping fee.
Jeremy
8:27 p.m.
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:58:47 +0100, Jeremy Jongepier
<jeremy(a)autostatic.com> wrote:
On 03/21/2013 04:58 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ok, I already replied to another thread off-list, but I guess it's time to
write to the list again and that Rosea says what he exactly wants to get.
IIUC connecting a nanoKONTROL to the masterkeyboard is not what he wants.
Also not connecting a nanoControl to the computer. I think I've got an
idea of what he wants. First off all a more advanced device than the
nanoKONTROL and second ... I'm uncertain what exactly is the reason for
the MIDI in out thru question mark ... I've got several ideas what he
might want it for, not only the thought about the cable, but why guessing,
if we can ask?
Hi,
I'm looking for something which I can use together with my 88keys
masterkeyb without knobs. It would be nice if it's small and light
enough to put on my keyboard itself. Something like the evolution uc-16,
but it would be nice if I could route my midi masterkeybd via the
controller to the computer (midi in / midi out / midi thru (?).
I like to control stuff like setBfree and some effects in Non-Mixer
probably.
Thanks in advance,
\r
Korg nanoKONTROL and an USB MIDI cable. Connect the MIDI OUT and IN of
your keyboard with the USB MIDI cable, connect your nanoKONTROL and off
you go :) I just received an USB MIDI cable from DealExtreme. Works OOTB
and was only $6 and no shipping fee.
10:04 p.m.
On 03/21/2013 08:26 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:58:47 +0100, Jeremy Jongepier
<jeremy(a)autostatic.com> wrote:
Man you can put tension in a email, ha :)
Ok let me free you from your questions. The question about the midi thru
is because of the cables, I rather want one cable trying to tackle me,
than two.
The format of the NanoKontol is not bad, but is this a real controller
or a toy? How are the knobs and how stable is the device (someone told
that it is stable on a keybd).
And how much extra latency gives such a converter cable compared to midi
out to midi in?
What are other (low budget) alternatives?
On 03/21/2013 04:58 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ok, I already replied to another thread off-list, but I guess it's time
to write to the list again and that Rosea says what he exactly wants to
get.
IIUC connecting a nanoKONTROL to the masterkeyboard is not what he
wants. Also not connecting a nanoControl to the computer. I think I've
got an idea of what he wants. First off all a more advanced device than
the nanoKONTROL and second ... I'm uncertain what exactly is the reason
for the MIDI in out thru question mark ... I've got several ideas what
he might want it for, not only the thought about the cable, but why
guessing, if we can ask? Hi,
I'm looking for something which I can use together with my 88keys
masterkeyb without knobs. It would be nice if it's small and light
enough to put on my keyboard itself. Something like the evolution uc-16,
but it would be nice if I could route my midi masterkeybd via the
controller to the computer (midi in / midi out / midi thru (?).
I like to control stuff like setBfree and some effects in Non-Mixer
probably.
Thanks in advance,
\r
Korg nanoKONTROL and an USB MIDI cable. Connect the MIDI OUT and IN of
your keyboard with the USB MIDI cable, connect your nanoKONTROL and
off you go :) I just received an USB MIDI cable from DealExtreme.
Works OOTB and was only $6 and no shipping fee.
10:47 p.m.
On 21/03/13 21:03, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Man you can put tension in a email, ha :)
Ok let me free you from your questions. The question about the midi thru
is because of the cables, I rather want one cable trying to tackle me,
than two.
The format of the NanoKontol is not bad, but is this a real controller
or a toy? How are the knobs and how stable is the device (someone told
that it is stable on a keybd).
And how much extra latency gives such a converter cable compared to midi
out to midi in?
What are other (low budget) alternatives?
Yes, it's small, plastic and (relatively) cheap. But it's made by Korg
-- it isn't a toy. Yes the faders are unpowered, but you don't need that
for controlling a Hammond sim, the knobs and buttons are a little wobbly
but not excessively so. Certainly no worse than you'd get on a full-size
controller keyboard.
I can see they might not stand up to being gigged a lot, chucked in bags
and bashed around.
If what you're controlling doesn't have midi learn you'll need to run
the editor software in WINE to change the assignments.
Review of the original Kontrol:
http://www.sonicstate.com/news/2008/12/22/sonic-lab-korg-nanokontrol-contro…
You're not going to get midi in/out/through on something so small. I've
only ever seen in/out/through on DIN which is far too big to fit into
something that size -- I guess that's why they went for a mini-USB
socket rather than standard size.
Q
11:57 a.m.
On 21/03/13 23:15, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 21:47 +0000, Q wrote:
Both the original Korg Nano editor and the updated version that works
with the originals and the second incarnations just works under Wine
here. I got the newer version from the Korg website a month or so ago.
When I tried it a few years ago I couldn't get NanoBasket to work so
didn't investigate it any further, I might have done if the Korg
programme hadn't worked.
Q
If what you're controlling doesn't have
midi learn you'll need to run
the editor software in WINE to change the assignments.
You have a version that does run under wine? Can you send it to me
off-list?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
12:05 p.m.
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 10:57 +0000, Q wrote:
Both the original Korg Nano editor and the updated
version that works
with the originals and the second incarnations just works under Wine
here. I got the newer version from the Korg website a month or so ago.
When I tried it a few years ago I couldn't get NanoBasket to work so
didn't investigate it any further, I might have done if the Korg
programme hadn't worked.
Thank you. That's strange, it never worked for wine here, but NanoBasket
does work, excepted of the option to load and save settings. Thank you
for mentioning the name of the Linux python app, so I don't need to
search for it any longer.
https://github.com/royvegard/Nano-Basket
Regards,
Ralf
22 Mar
22 Mar
12:13 a.m.
Does anybody know what Linux apps are able to interact with a MIDI
remote control, assumed the MIDI control is able to interact with apps?
Review, a little bit too long.
The nanoKONTROL has one serious disadvantage. You can't expect motorized
sliders for that price, but at least the "pan pots" could be dialing
wheels, able to receive the value from the software and to continue from
that value, but even if the software should be able to interact with the
control, AFAIK the nanoKONTROL is unable to handle this.
It's very good workmanship for that price, a much better quality than my
Behringer products provide (ADA 8000, Modulizer Pro and UB24442-FX2-PRO)
compared by price-performance ratio. 4 cm faders, very short, but a
better slide than e.g. the allegedly Alps of my Behringer mixer. The
plastic case isn't as bad as you might think, but of course, it's
plastic.
The python app for Linux (have forgotten the name and need to download
it again :S) to save scenes works very good, you can assign all kinds of
functionality to the faders, pots and knobs, but unfortunately saving
and loading settings doesn't work. The nanoKONTROL does hold the
assignments, but you perhaps want to change them by loading other
assignments. The original Korg app doesn't run under wine and I didn't
test it with VBox until now. The Linux app might not work for the new
nanoKONTROL.
I like it very much and I'm willing to buy additional nanoKONTROLs.
Since it's not expensive you should buy one to test it.
I don't know the device you mentioned, but this devices seems to be more
advanced. Until now I only used the nanoKONTROL to manipulate Yoshimi
filters in real-time and this does work perfectly, the only drawback is
the issue regarding to the values. As long as you keep the fader and app
in sync, e.g. by not switching the scene and only continuing from the
last position of fader control, IOW no rewind by the sequencer etc. it's
not an issue, but assumed you want to readjust some values by real-time
recording, than you can forget the nanoKONTROL, it's easier to record
the controllers again, instead of readjusting just some values in the
timeline.
For my needs it's good, but it's not perfect, even mouse control by
Atari's Cubase real-time SysEx editor is better regarding to some
aspects.
It isn't a toy, but it can't replace a mixing console or the control
panel of an old analog synth. It's a compromise.
Latency isn't an issue and you can use it with an extension cable, but I
didn't test how long the cable can be, before it stops working.
I don't use a converter cable, I use USB connected to the computer.
I can't speak for a converter cable, but for serious work you can only
use one MIDI thru, if you make a chain by two MIDI thru, than MIDI can't
be used for serious work anymore. But it's always better to avoid even
one MIDI thru.
While the opto-couplers in the 80s were slower, but still fast enough
for MIDI, there were no level issues in the past. Today they often use
opto-couplers that are much faster than needed, but the level often is
to low to work properly. So I won't trust a cheap converter cable. Btw.
faster opto-couplers don't make the latency shorter. Important is a
clean slew rate and good level, that also won't reduce the latency, but
will avoid errors.
As for low budget, buy a KORG nanoKONTROL, it will satisfy you for that
price.
Btw. IMO MIDI jitter is less important for control data, but it could be
important, if so you indeed should get a real MIDI IO device, instead of
an USB MIDI device, assumed you use MIDI for the computer by PCI/PCIe
instead of USB.
I can't use my iPad as remote for Linux, hopefully it's possible in the
future, since it does provide very nice MIDI controller apps. But an
iPad for sure isn't stable enough (regarding to the display) for stage,
much to expensive already without MIDI equipment, didn't get WiFi
working until now and it's Apple :(.
Perhaps it's possible to use cheap tablet PCs as MIDI remote too.
Sorry, English isn't my strong point.
9:37 a.m.
On 03/22/2013 12:13 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Does anybody know what Linux apps are able to interact
with a MIDI
remote control, assumed the MIDI control is able to interact with apps?
Ralf,
You need to create a new thread for questions like this, they don't
belong in an existing thread especially when they're followed by an
epistle like the one below. Thanks.
Regards,
Jeremy
Review, a little bit too long.
The nanoKONTROL has one serious disadvantage. You can't expect motorized
sliders for that price, but at least the "pan pots" could be dialing
wheels, able to receive the value from the software and to continue from
that value, but even if the software should be able to interact with the
control, AFAIK the nanoKONTROL is unable to handle this.
It's very good workmanship for that price, a much better quality than my
Behringer products provide (ADA 8000, Modulizer Pro and UB24442-FX2-PRO)
compared by price-performance ratio. 4 cm faders, very short, but a
better slide than e.g. the allegedly Alps of my Behringer mixer. The
plastic case isn't as bad as you might think, but of course, it's
plastic.
The python app for Linux (have forgotten the name and need to download
it again :S) to save scenes works very good, you can assign all kinds of
functionality to the faders, pots and knobs, but unfortunately saving
and loading settings doesn't work. The nanoKONTROL does hold the
assignments, but you perhaps want to change them by loading other
assignments. The original Korg app doesn't run under wine and I didn't
test it with VBox until now. The Linux app might not work for the new
nanoKONTROL.
I like it very much and I'm willing to buy additional nanoKONTROLs.
Since it's not expensive you should buy one to test it.
I don't know the device you mentioned, but this devices seems to be more
advanced. Until now I only used the nanoKONTROL to manipulate Yoshimi
filters in real-time and this does work perfectly, the only drawback is
the issue regarding to the values. As long as you keep the fader and app
in sync, e.g. by not switching the scene and only continuing from the
last position of fader control, IOW no rewind by the sequencer etc. it's
not an issue, but assumed you want to readjust some values by real-time
recording, than you can forget the nanoKONTROL, it's easier to record
the controllers again, instead of readjusting just some values in the
timeline.
For my needs it's good, but it's not perfect, even mouse control by
Atari's Cubase real-time SysEx editor is better regarding to some
aspects.
It isn't a toy, but it can't replace a mixing console or the control
panel of an old analog synth. It's a compromise.
Latency isn't an issue and you can use it with an extension cable, but I
didn't test how long the cable can be, before it stops working.
I don't use a converter cable, I use USB connected to the computer.
I can't speak for a converter cable, but for serious work you can only
use one MIDI thru, if you make a chain by two MIDI thru, than MIDI can't
be used for serious work anymore. But it's always better to avoid even
one MIDI thru.
While the opto-couplers in the 80s were slower, but still fast enough
for MIDI, there were no level issues in the past. Today they often use
opto-couplers that are much faster than needed, but the level often is
to low to work properly. So I won't trust a cheap converter cable. Btw.
faster opto-couplers don't make the latency shorter. Important is a
clean slew rate and good level, that also won't reduce the latency, but
will avoid errors.
As for low budget, buy a KORG nanoKONTROL, it will satisfy you for that
price.
Btw. IMO MIDI jitter is less important for control data, but it could be
important, if so you indeed should get a real MIDI IO device, instead of
an USB MIDI device, assumed you use MIDI for the computer by PCI/PCIe
instead of USB.
I can't use my iPad as remote for Linux, hopefully it's possible in the
future, since it does provide very nice MIDI controller apps. But an
iPad for sure isn't stable enough (regarding to the display) for stage,
much to expensive already without MIDI equipment, didn't get WiFi
working until now and it's Apple :(.
Perhaps it's possible to use cheap tablet PCs as MIDI remote too.
Sorry, English isn't my strong point.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
9:49 a.m.
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 09:32 +0100, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 03/22/2013 12:13 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
If Rosea want's to know about disadvantages of the nanoKONTROL this
information is important. Why buying a controller that can interact with
applications, e.g. by providing motorized faders, if no Linux app should
be able to interact with a controller?
Some of my so called noise, isn't noise, it's just that some people
sometimes are not aware about some things.
I don't like to recommend the nanoKONTROL that easy as others do, since
my audio card was recommended by community members, that never tested if
the card really does work, so I own a card that only can use 2 ADAT
channels.
If Rosea should expect that a simple MIDI controller does work like a
control panel of a hardware synth or an analog mixer, than it's
important to explain that the nanoKONTROL doesn't provide this and even
if you buy a MIDI controller that does provide this functionality, it
also must be supported by the apps.
I like the nanoKONTROL very much, but even the software to set up the
nanoKONTROL might not satisfy Rosea's needs.
The Linux python app can't save and load and the available Windows apps
never worked with wine on my machine. If there shuld be a version that
does under wine, than I at least expect to name the version and where it
can be downloaded.
Does anybody know what Linux apps are able to
interact with a MIDI
remote control, assumed the MIDI control is able to interact with apps?
Ralf,
You need to create a new thread for questions like this, they don't
belong in an existing thread especially when they're followed by an
epistle like the one below.
12:25 p.m.
On 03/21/2013 07:58 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 03/21/2013 04:58 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
How's the nanokontrol powered this way, via the midi master keybd?
And the nanokontrol has micro usb right? Could you give a link to the
cable that works? :)
Are the knobs of the nanokontrol 'rotary knobs'?
You can only assign the nanokontrol to the software, you can't restore
certain settings presets with certain settings for midi values (e.g. a
certain slider in setBfree)?
\r
Hi,
I'm looking for something which I can use together with my 88keys
masterkeyb without knobs. It would be nice if it's small and light
enough to put on my keyboard itself. Something like the evolution uc-16,
but it would be nice if I could route my midi masterkeybd via the
controller to the computer (midi in / midi out / midi thru (?).
I like to control stuff like setBfree and some effects in Non-Mixer
probably.
Thanks in advance,
\r
Korg nanoKONTROL and an USB MIDI cable. Connect the MIDI OUT and IN of
your keyboard with the USB MIDI cable, connect your nanoKONTROL and off
you go :) I just received an USB MIDI cable from DealExtreme. Works OOTB
and was only $6 and no shipping fee.
1:03 p.m.
On 03/22/2013 12:24 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
How's the nanokontrol powered this way, via the midi master keybd?
No, via the PC.
And the nanokontrol has micro usb right? Could you
give a link to the
cable that works? :)
http://dx.com/p/usb-2-0-to-midi-converter-adapter-cable-178-5cm-length-1109…
Are the knobs of the nanokontrol 'rotary knobs'?
IIRC yes.
You can only assign the nanokontrol to the software,
you can't restore
certain settings presets with certain settings for midi values (e.g. a
certain slider in setBfree)?
Yes you can, the nanoKONTROL has 4 different scenes you can program. And
if you need more scenes you can always use tools like mididings or
QMidiRoute.
Jeremy
\r
2:02 p.m.
On 03/22/2013 01:03 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 03/22/2013 12:24 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
But my PC is 3 m away from my master keyb (with midi out), I thought the
usb to midi cable was meant to bridge that gap.
Now I lost sight on what that usb to midi cable should be. :)
Moreover, how do I solve the 'distance power problem'.
\r
How's the nanokontrol powered this way, via the midi master keybd?
No, via the PC.
2:12 p.m.
On 22/03/13 13:01, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 03/22/2013 01:03 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
The Nanos are powered by USB only, there is no other way of powering
them. So, however you connect them up for midi, it would still have to
be connected to the PC and have some sort of splitter arrangement. In
the long run, it sounds a lot easier just to use midi-over-USB.
The review I posted yesterday said that they draw very little power,
which might be useful if power drops off over distance.
Q
On 03/22/2013 12:24 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
But my PC is 3 m away from my master keyb (with midi out), I thought the
usb to midi cable was meant to bridge that gap.
Now I lost sight on what that usb to midi cable should be. :)
Moreover, how do I solve the 'distance power problem'.
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
How's the nanokontrol powered this way, via the midi master keybd?
No, via the PC.
2:16 p.m.
On 03/22/2013 02:12 PM, Q wrote:
On 22/03/13 13:01, rosea.grammostola wrote:
You're suggesting a long usb cable? Are the USB-cables which can cover
about 5 meters?
On 03/22/2013 01:03 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
The Nanos are powered by USB only, there is no other way of powering
them. So, however you connect them up for midi, it would still have to
be connected to the PC and have some sort of splitter arrangement. In
the long run, it sounds a lot easier just to use midi-over-USB.
The review I posted yesterday said that they draw very little power,
which might be useful if power drops off over distance. On 03/22/2013 12:24 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
But my PC is 3 m away from my master keyb (with midi out), I thought the
usb to midi cable was meant to bridge that gap.
Now I lost sight on what that usb to midi cable should be. :)
Moreover, how do I solve the 'distance power problem'.
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
How's the nanokontrol powered this way, via the midi master keybd?
No, via the PC.
3:04 p.m.
On 22/03/13 13:15, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 03/22/2013 02:12 PM, Q wrote:
I'm not suggesting -- I don't know whether you can get cables that long
and I don't know whether it would deliver power over that distance --
but the ONLY way you could possibly power it is with it connected via
USB to a computer, either directly or via a USB hub.
Q
The Nanos are powered by USB only, there is no
other way of powering
them. So, however you connect them up for midi, it would still have to
be connected to the PC and have some sort of splitter arrangement. In
the long run, it sounds a lot easier just to use midi-over-USB.
The review I posted yesterday said that they draw very little power,
which might be useful if power drops off over distance.
You're suggesting a long usb cable? Are the USB-cables which can cover
about 5 meters?
3:55 p.m.
On Fri, March 22, 2013 6:12 am, Q wrote:
>> On 03/22/2013 12:24 PM, rosea.grammostola
wrote:
> Moreover, how do I solve the 'distance power
problem'.
The Nanos are powered by USB only, there is no other
way of powering
them. So, however you connect them up for midi, it would still have to
be connected to the PC and have some sort of splitter arrangement. In
the long run, it sounds a lot easier just to use midi-over-USB.
The review I posted yesterday said that they draw very little power,
which might be useful if power drops off over distance.
Many USB hubs add power.
--
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net
4 p.m.
On 03/22/2013 03:55 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
On Fri, March 22, 2013 6:12 am, Q wrote:
Nanokontrol > usb hub (powered) > usb to midi > soundcard / midisport,
that would be a solution right?
>> On 03/22/2013 12:24 PM, rosea.grammostola
wrote:
> Moreover, how do I solve the 'distance
power problem'.
The Nanos are powered by USB only, there is no
other way of powering
them. So, however you connect them up for midi, it would still have to
be connected to the PC and have some sort of splitter arrangement. In
the long run, it sounds a lot easier just to use midi-over-USB.
The review I posted yesterday said that they draw very little power,
which might be useful if power drops off over distance.
Many USB hubs add power.
8:10 p.m.
On 03/22/2013 04:03 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 03/22/2013 03:59 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ok thx for info guys. To me it seems that the nanokontrol is not the
ideal choice atm. All though there're options to get it working:
http://www.thomann.de/nl/cme_widix8.htm
I might stick with my bcr2000 also from my master keybd (all though the
thing is big). I might need a nice stand for the bcr2000 and for my
laptop too.
This thing seems close to ideal at first sight:
http://www.cme-pro.com/products-list/product-Bitstream3X.html
I just need some more money. The CME things looks good in general. I
like the cleanness of the Z series for example, no bad knobs, good keys
(afaik) and features you don't need or are better bought as module imo.
Best,
\r
Nanokontrol > usb hub (powered) > usb to
midi > soundcard / midisport,
that would be a solution right?
Haven't tried it but I don't think a USB MIDI cable can convert data
coming from an USB MIDI device.
8:36 p.m.
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 20:09 +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Did you make enquiries? (This) Wireless MIDI is ok?
Since my Yamaha vector synthesis synth doesn't work properly anymore I
was thinking to buy the Bitstream too, but I can't, since it does cost
375,00 € :(. I don't know if it's good or bad, but at least recording a
joystick is a very nice feature. The Yamaha TG33 can do this too, the
basic sounds are total crap, but once mixed with the recorded joystick
movements, the crappy sounds become amazing. The Yamaha synth does mix
four sound sources, one joystick movement is for mixing the volume of
the 4 sound sources and a second joystick movement is for mixing fine
pitch of the four sound sources. You've got 2 low quality samples and 2
low quality FM synthesis only mixed by volume and pitch, but the result
is an amazing sound. It should be possible to get this with Linux synth
too when using the Bitstream. Should be ideal for your kind of music :).
I'm interested in a review, once you own and used it.
24 Mar
24 Mar
9:45 p.m.
On 03/22/2013 08:09 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ok thx for info guys. To me it seems that the
nanokontrol is not the
ideal choice atm. All though there're options to get it working:
http://www.thomann.de/nl/cme_widix8.htm
I might stick with my bcr2000 also from my master keybd (all though the
thing is big). I might need a nice stand for the bcr2000 and for my
laptop too.
This thing seems close to ideal at first sight:
http://www.cme-pro.com/products-list/product-Bitstream3X.html
I just need some more money. The CME things looks good in general. I
like the cleanness of the Z series for example, no bad knobs, good keys
(afaik) and features you don't need or are better bought as module imo.
Best,
\r
Why not use a Raspberry Pi for this?
* RPi: €35,- (eventually with extra casing, add another €10,-)
* SD card: €10,-
* USB MIDI cable: €5,-
* WiFi dongle: €5,-
* QMidiCtl: free
So for €55,- and some time (but I'm more than willing to help out) you
should be set.
Jeremy
27 Mar
27 Mar
3:37 p.m.
On 03/24/2013 09:45 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 03/22/2013 08:09 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Thanks, that's a nice offer but I feel something like the 3X could be
useful for me for many years for different setups. With cheaper
solutions like the nanokontrol you always bump against limitations or
less quality material.
The 3X even seems to have conf. software for Linux Fedora 5, not sure
how useful that is today though!??
http://www.waveidea.com/en/products/bitstream_3x/downloads.php
That with a Linux tablet which logins to my workstation via ssh -X to
monitor the GUIs (and controlling non-sequencer) would be a dream I think.
But I like the idea of the RPi too, it's great that there are linux
devices which makes such things possible for little money.
Regards,
\r
Ok thx for info guys. To me it seems that the
nanokontrol is not the
ideal choice atm. All though there're options to get it working:
http://www.thomann.de/nl/cme_widix8.htm
I might stick with my bcr2000 also from my master keybd (all though the
thing is big). I might need a nice stand for the bcr2000 and for my
laptop too.
This thing seems close to ideal at first sight:
http://www.cme-pro.com/products-list/product-Bitstream3X.html
I just need some more money. The CME things looks good in general. I
like the cleanness of the Z series for example, no bad knobs, good keys
(afaik) and features you don't need or are better bought as module imo.
Best,
\r
Why not use a Raspberry Pi for this?
* RPi: €35,- (eventually with extra casing, add another €10,-)
* SD card: €10,-
* USB MIDI cable: €5,-
* WiFi dongle: €5,-
* QMidiCtl: free
So for €55,- and some time (but I'm more than willing to help out) you
should be set.
2 Apr
2 Apr
5:37 p.m.
New subject: 'Modular' midi controller for keyboard (RPi)
On 03/24/2013 09:45 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
Why not use a Raspberry Pi for this?
* RPi: €35,- (eventually with extra casing, add another €10,-)
* SD card: €10,-
* USB MIDI cable: €5,-
* WiFi dongle: €5,-
* QMidiCtl: free
So for €55,- and some time (but I'm more than willing to help out) you
should be set.
What is the boot time of the RPi? How much noise does it make?
10:11 p.m.
New subject: 'Modular' midi controller for keyboard (RPi)
On 04/02/2013 05:36 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
What is the boot time of the RPi? How much noise does
it make?
Haven't measured the boot time, guess it's about 20 seconds (untweaked).
It's fanless so it doesn't make any noise.
Jeremy
25 Mar
25 Mar
2:02 a.m.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:09 AM, rosea.grammostola <
rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/22/2013 04:03 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
You might consider the Faderfox series of controllers if you can find them.
The 3rd generation are all USB midi unfortunately, but you may still be
able to find a 2nd generation LD2, which is battery powered over
traditional midi DIN and gives 16 rotary knobs.
http://www.faderfox.de/home.html
On 03/22/2013 03:59 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ok thx for info guys. To me it seems that the nanokontrol is not the ideal
choice atm. All though there're options to get it working:
http://www.thomann.de/nl/cme_**widix8.htm<http://www.thomann.de/nl/cme_w…
I might stick with my bcr2000 also from my master keybd (all though the
thing is big). I might need a nice stand for the bcr2000 and for my laptop
too.
This thing seems close to ideal at first sight:
http://www.cme-pro.com/**products-list/product-**Bitstream3X.html<http:/…
I just need some more money. The CME things looks good in general. I like
the cleanness of the Z series for example, no bad knobs, good keys (afaik)
and features you don't need or are better bought as module imo.
Best,
\r
Nanokontrol > usb hub (powered) > usb to
midi > soundcard / midisport,
that would be a solution right?
Haven't tried it but I don't think a USB MIDI cable can convert data
coming from an USB MIDI device.
22 Mar
22 Mar
5:31 p.m.
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 15:59 +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 03/22/2013 03:55 PM, Len Ovens wrote:
3 m definitive do work and I guess 5 m should work too. I experienced
that most devices are ok with even 10 m. Perhaps I can test it this
weekend.
And no, at least the older nanoKONTROL doesn't have rotary knobs, those
knobs have a stop at the left and at the right.
And yes, you can save several scenes and you can align the knobs and
faders to controller etc., but it doesn't interact with the data for
that controllers, IOW if you have a timeline and you increase the volume
from 0 to 64 to 127 and you then rewind to re-record and want to
increase from 64 to 100 instead of 127, than you need to find the
position for 64, something that is hard to do, so you can't use it like
a real mixer or like the mouse for the faders on the display. If you
want to use it for heavy mixing you need an application that can talk to
the device and you need a device with motorized faders or rotary knobs.
You got simply incorrect information by others.
On Fri, March 22, 2013 6:12 am, Q wrote:
Nanokontrol > usb hub (powered) > usb to midi > soundcard / midisport,
that would be a solution right? >> On 03/22/2013 12:24 PM, rosea.grammostola
wrote:
> Moreover, how do I solve the 'distance
power problem'.
The Nanos are powered by USB only, there is no
other way of powering
them. So, however you connect them up for midi, it would still have to
be connected to the PC and have some sort of splitter arrangement. In
the long run, it sounds a lot easier just to use midi-over-USB.
The review I posted yesterday said that they draw very little power,
which might be useful if power drops off over distance.
Many USB hubs add power.
7:44 p.m.
On 03/22/2013 05:31 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
And no, at least the older nanoKONTROL doesn't
have rotary knobs, those
knobs have a stop at the left and at the right.
True, just pulled out my own nanoKONTROL and those knobs are not rotary.
You got simply incorrect information by others.
Not from me. I may have given incomplete information but I didn't give
incorrect information.
Jeremy
8:54 p.m.
On 22/03/13 18:44, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 03/22/2013 05:31 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Actually, it does have rotary knobs -- they are knobs and they rotate
between fixed end points, which is what knobs do.
What it doesn't have is rotary ENCODERS (i.e. the endless variety).
Q
And no, at least the older nanoKONTROL
doesn't have rotary knobs, those
knobs have a stop at the left and at the right.
True, just pulled out my own nanoKONTROL and those knobs are not rotary.
You got simply incorrect information by others.
Not from me. I may have given incomplete information but I didn't give
incorrect information.
Jeremy
29 Mar
29 Mar
1:32 p.m.
On 03/22/2013 08:54 PM, Q wrote:
On 22/03/13 18:44, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
When do you need rotary knobs and when rotary encoder knobs?
\r
On 03/22/2013 05:31 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Actually, it does have rotary knobs -- they are knobs and they rotate
between fixed end points, which is what knobs do.
What it doesn't have is rotary ENCODERS (i.e. the endless variety). And no, at least the older nanoKONTROL
doesn't have rotary knobs, those
knobs have a stop at the left and at the right.
True, just pulled out my own nanoKONTROL and those knobs are not rotary.
You got simply incorrect information by others.
Not from me. I may have given incomplete information but I didn't give
incorrect information.
Jeremy
3:03 p.m.
On Fri, March 29, 2013 5:31 am, rosea.grammostola wrote:
For a remote control such as this you may have a rotary pot, a rotary
encoder or a rotary pot with a motor.
- A rotary pot will stay where you left it, it is totally manual. If
turned to 100% it will stay there.
- A rotary encoder can always increase or decrease beyond 100% or 0%...
this doesn't sound useful, but in the case of using a preset it can be.
if the knob is set to 100% and a preset is loaded that now sees that knob
as 50%, that knob can still be increased, that is it still has full
range. However, there can be no markings on it... that is you cannot look
at it and know it is at 60%... unless there is some kind of indicator
that uses LEDs or LCDs.
- A rotary pot with a motor, has a small motor that moves a 0 to 100% pot
to a preset level under program control. So if you have set the pot
manually to 40% and then load a preset where that control is now 73%, the
control will move (physically) on it's own to 73%. So any marks on the
pot or around it will be accurate. This is the most expensive option (if
you can find it) and I don't know if it is worth it in any case. I would
question how road worthy it would be. It is used extensively for analogue
mixer automation... in places that have someone to maintain things.
an encoder would probably be the nicest thing to have if you want to load
presets. however, if you are used to glancing at the knobs to see where
they are set, you would also want some kind of light indicator to tell you
where the knob is set... The only problem is that the program you are
controlling has to provide feedback when started or using a preset.
normal rotary pots will always be where you left them, but... when powered
up the controller sends knob positions to the computer, now you load the
program you are using it to control. That program does not know where the
controls are so either the program has to ask, or send something that says
set this to something so the controller can say, "ok, now change that to
where I am set physically", or the controller has to send all it's setting
at that time. I don't know how these boxes handle this. I suppose the
controller could send all the settings at intervals.
--
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net
On 03/22/2013 08:54 PM, Q wrote:
Actually, it
does have rotary knobs -- they are knobs and they rotate
between fixed end points, which is what knobs do.
What it doesn't have is rotary ENCODERS (i.e. the endless variety).
When do you need rotary knobs and when rotary encoder knobs?
22 Mar
22 Mar
2:31 p.m.
On 03/22/2013 02:01 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 03/22/2013 01:03 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
Yes, it is meant to bridge the gap between master keyboard and PC. Not
to bridge the gap between the nanoKONTROL and your master keyboard.
On 03/22/2013 12:24 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
But my PC is 3 m away from my master keyb (with midi out), I thought the
usb to midi cable was meant to bridge that gap.
How's the nanokontrol powered this way, via the midi master keybd?
No, via the PC. Now I lost sight on what that usb to midi cable should
be. :)
To connect your keyboard to your PC.
Moreover, how do I solve the 'distance power
problem'.
Master keyboard --> USB MIDI cable (eventually with an USB extension
cable) --> PC
MIDI controller (nanoKONTROL) --> (USB extension cable) --> PC
But what you probably want is a USB MIDI controller with MIDI in (like
your BCR2000) that is portable. Afaik no such thing exists in the price
range you have in mind. And using your BCR2000 is not an option?
Jeremy
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
4282
days inactive
4294
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
39 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Jeremy Jongepier -
Len Ovens -
michael noble -
Q -
Ralf Mardorf -
rosea.grammostola