28 Nov
2010
28 Nov
'10
12:28 p.m.
wouldn't it be nice to have a benchmark for jack? like a software you plug to the
sever wich would stresss it to the limits?
you could try out diferent preferences for jack and diferent kernels easier.
Fabio
28 Nov
28 Nov
4:29 p.m.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Fabio <capoeirista(a)arcor.de> wrote:
wouldn't it be nice to have a benchmark for jack?
like a software you plug to the sever wich would stresss it to the limits?
you could try out diferent preferences for jack and diferent kernels easier.
work has been done on this. its much more complicated than you would
imagine, and proper testing takes hours and hours.
5:40 p.m.
Em domingo 28 novembro 2010, às 13:29:00, você escreveu:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Fabio
<capoeirista(a)arcor.de> wrote:
ah, ok...thanks for response.....wouldn't be verry usable than :-(
Fabio
wouldn't it be nice to have a benchmark for
jack? like a software you plug to the sever wich would stresss it to the limits?
you could try out diferent preferences for jack and diferent kernels easier.
work has been done on this. its much more complicated than you would
imagine, and proper testing takes hours and hours.
6:08 p.m.
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 09:29:00 am Paul Davis wrote:
Is any of this work available publicly?
-gabriel
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Fabio
<capoeirista(a)arcor.de> wrote:
wouldn't
it be nice to have a benchmark for jack? like
work has been done on this. its much more complicated
than you would imagine, and proper testing takes hours
and hours.
6:09 p.m.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield
<gabrbedd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, November 28, 2010 09:29:00 am Paul Davis
wrote:
Is any of this work available publicly?
Florian Faber is the point guard on this. Not sure if he wants to let
it out or not. It really turned out to be VERY hard to effectively
test JACK thorougly.
--p
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Fabio
<capoeirista(a)arcor.de> wrote:
wouldn't it be nice to have a benchmark for jack? like
work has been done on this. its much more complicated
than you would imagine, and proper testing takes hours
and hours. 
29 Nov
29 Nov
12:04 a.m.
On 11/28/10 18:09, Paul Davis wrote:
Everything I did is published on wiki.linuxaudio.org:
http://wiki.linuxproaudio.org/index.php/jack_performance_measurement
http://wiki.linuxproaudio.org/index.php/jack:latency_measurement
http://wiki.linuxproaudio.org/index.php/jack:dsp_benchmark
I'm not sure anybody has ever done systematic testings of system
parametrers before. Unfortunately my measurements were invalid due to a
bug at that time in jack's buffer managment, but I welcome anybody to
resume work on that topic.
Flo
--
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
public key DA43FEF4 x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Gabriel M.
Beddingfield
<gabrbedd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is any of this
work available publicly?
Florian Faber is the point guard on this. Not sure if he
wants to let
it out or not. It really turned out to be VERY hard to effectively
test JACK thorougly.
4899
days inactive
4899
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Fabio -
Florian Faber -
Gabriel M. Beddingfield -
Paul Davis