27 May
2009
27 May
'09
6:24 a.m.
Hi Tom,
I just went fine with the instructions on the jack-faq-page (http://jackaudio.org/faq).
Did you add these lines to your /etc/security/limits.conf ?:
------------------
@audio - rtprio 99
@audio - memlock unlimited
@audio - nice -19
------------------
Do not forget to add yourself to the group 'audio' and re-login. This in
combination with the rt-kernel works great for me.
Regards, Thomas
could someone point me in the direction to a guide on
setting up rt-
kernel on ubuntu jaunty. i'm having trouble getting qjackctl started
in realtime mode despite the fact that i am running 2.6.28-3-rt #12-
Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT RT. i've done this in other distros but i must be
missing something here.
thanks.
t
____________________________________________________________
Text: GRATIS für alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://produkte.web.de/go/04/
27 May
27 May
4:50 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
I had a lot of latency problems running Ubuntu 8.10 with a realtime kernel.
And nothing changed modifying the limits.conf file and adding myself to the
audio group. So I decided to install Musix <http://www.musix.org.ar/>. I
think it is the best distro for audio-linux ever. At first glance it looks
rather messy but it works as smooth as a Mercedes-Benz.
I've reached latencies of 3 ms. with no trace of xrun nor clicks in the
audio, while in Ubuntu I just could barely get close to 25 ms which was
insane. I cannot recommend anything else. Trust me.
Good luck!
2009/5/27 Thomas Kerstgens <thomas_kerstgens(a)web.de>
Hi Tom,
I just went fine with the instructions on the jack-faq-page (
http://jackaudio.org/faq). Did you add these lines to your
/etc/security/limits.conf ?:
------------------
@audio - rtprio 99
@audio - memlock unlimited
@audio - nice -19
------------------
Do not forget to add yourself to the group 'audio' and re-login. This in
combination with the rt-kernel works great for me.
Regards, Thomas
could someone point me in the direction to a
guide on setting up rt-
kernel on ubuntu jaunty. i'm having trouble getting qjackctl started
in realtime mode despite the fact that i am running 2.6.28-3-rt #12-
Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT RT. i've done this in other distros but i must be
missing something here.
thanks.
t
____________________________________________________________
Text: GRATIS für alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://produkte.web.de/go/04/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
5:57 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Marcel Marti kirjoitti:
I've reached latencies of 3 ms. with no trace of
xrun nor clicks in the
audio, while in Ubuntu I just could barely get close to 25 ms which was
insane.
http://www.arkki.info/howto/Ubuntu_Studio/904_ffado_01.png
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 9.04
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu-studio 2.6.28-3-rt #12-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT RT Fri Apr 17
10:09:12 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ cat .jackdrc
/usr/bin/jackd -R -P89 -m -dfirewire -dhw:1 -r48000 -p64 -n3
Best Regards Asmo Koskinen.
28 May
28 May
5:43 a.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
2009/5/27 Marcel Marti <marcel.marti(a)gmail.com>
I had a lot of latency problems running Ubuntu 8.10
with a realtime kernel.
And nothing changed modifying the limits.conf file and adding myself to the
audio group. So I decided to install Musix <http://www.musix.org.ar/>. I
think it is the best distro for audio-linux ever. At first glance it looks
rather messy but it works as smooth as a Mercedes-Benz.
I've reached latencies of 3 ms. with no trace of xrun nor clicks in the
audio, while in Ubuntu I just could barely get close to 25 ms which was
insane. I cannot recommend anything else. Trust me.
Good luck!
I think Ubuntu is the problem.
debian fan
-r
7:23 a.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
I think Ubuntu is the problem.
With only an afternoon of effort, i am finding this audio set up quite
tedious. i was on gentoo which was not without other issues, but the audio
optimisations were well documented and straightforward.
Perhaps there is a list of differences between ubunutu and ubunutu-studio
that could be compared. Asmo, you seem to be quite happy... any ideas?
thanks for your help thus far, but i'm afraid the audio workstation is going
to need a few hours of tweaking before my native-ubuntu is audio happy.
btw,
is anyone else having random lock ups with the "2.6.28-3-rt #12-Ubuntu SMP
PREEMPT RT" kernel. i'm on a lenovo r61 and this kernel seems to freeze
randomly with no warning. Not worth the risk on audio recording or
performances, eek.
thanks,
t
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Raffaele Morelli <
raffaele.morelli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/5/27 Marcel Marti <marcel.marti(a)gmail.com>
I had a lot of latency problems running Ubuntu
8.10 with a realtime
kernel. And nothing changed modifying the limits.conf file and adding myself
to the audio group. So I decided to install Musix<http://www.musix.org.ar/>.
I think it is the best distro for audio-linux ever. At first glance it looks
rather messy but it works as smooth as a Mercedes-Benz.
I've reached latencies of 3 ms. with no trace of xrun nor clicks in the
audio, while in Ubuntu I just could barely get close to 25 ms which was
insane. I cannot recommend anything else. Trust me.
Good luck!
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
3:59 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Tom Dunstan kirjoitti:
Asmo, you seem to be quite happy... any ideas?
Yes I am. Here is my laptop with Echo AudioFire4.
http://www.arkki.info/howto/Ubuntu_Studio/904_ffado_02.png
This time latency is 8 ms. Where, when and why someone needs something
like 3 ms?
I follow this statement here: "Apple considers everything < 10ms as
'good enough'. And the audio pro's seem to be very happy with Apple."
http://subversion.ffado.org/wiki/SomeNotesOnLatency
----
1. Laptop is Intel/ATI based - Acer TM 6592.
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ lspci
00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82566MM Gigabit Network
Connection (rev 03)
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio
Controller (rev 03)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon HD 2400 XT
06:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or
AGN [Kedron] Network Connection (rev 61)
0a:04.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): O2 Micro, Inc. Firewire (IEEE 1394) (rev 02)
0a:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB23
IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link)
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$
2. I can use wlan with RT kernel (screenshot).
3. I have of course tweaked system, that takes few lines in few files.
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ cat /etc/security/limits.conf
@audio - memlock unlimited
@audio - nice -19
@audio - rtprio 99
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ cat /etc/group | grep audio
audio:x:29:pulse,studio
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ cat /etc/modules
loop
lp
rtc
snd-seq
raw1394
video1394
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ lsmod | grep 1394
video1394 26216 0
raw1394 35976 28
ohci1394 42548 15 video1394
ieee1394 110176 3 video1394,raw1394,ohci1394
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ ls -al /dev/raw1394
crwxrwxrwx 1 root root 171, 0 2009-05-28 17:10 /dev/raw1394
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$
----
On the desktop machine I use M-Audio Delta 66, I have both - 8.04 x86_64
and 9.04 x86_64.
Here is my howto in finnish for Ubuntu Studio 8.04 x86_64.
http://wiki.ubuntu-fi.org/Ubuntu_Studio
----
Btw - I used that Ubuntu Studio 9.04 x86_64 (RT kernel) on that laptop
as a Flumotion server over six hours at my daughter's school - just
like year ago.
http://www.arkki.info/howto/Flumotion/Flumotion_02.png
http://wiki.ubuntu-fi.org/Flumotion
----
So to me Ubuntu Studio just works. Maybe I'm just lucky with hardware...
or maybe I have done my homework for hardware...
----
Best Regards Asmo Koskinen.
4:09 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
3. I have of course tweaked system, that takes few
lines in few files.
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ cat /etc/security/limits.conf
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ cat /etc/group | grep audio
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ cat /etc/modules
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ lsmod | grep 1394
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ ls -al /dev/raw1394
I forgot this one.
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$ cat /etc/sysctl.conf
dev.rtc.max-user-freq=1024
studio@ubuntu-studio:~$
Best Regards Asmo Koskinen.
4:29 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Asmo Koskinen kirjoitti:
Btw - I used that Ubuntu Studio 9.04 x86_64 (RT
kernel) on that laptop
as a Flumotion server over six hours at my daughter's school - just
like year ago.
Sorry for lapsus (8/9) here. I used 8.04 x86_64 (RT kernel) on that
laptop just like year ago.
Best Regards Asmo Koskinen.
29 May
29 May
5:24 a.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
2009/5/28 Asmo Koskinen <asmo.koskinen(a)arkki.info>
Tom Dunstan kirjoitti:
Here we aim at 1.6ms with the hope of at least 2.7ms
If you do monitoring and using real time fx while recording one or more
tracks with a mixing console then 8ms is really a bad latency.
I follow this statement here: "Apple considers everything < 10ms as
Asmo, you seem to be quite happy... any ideas?
Yes I am. Here is my laptop with Echo AudioFire4.
http://www.arkki.info/howto/Ubuntu_Studio/904_ffado_02.png
This time latency is 8 ms. Where, when and why someone needs something
like 3 ms? 'good enough'. And the audio pro's seem to
be very happy with Apple."
I got a patch for this: "Apple considers everything good enough if you plan
to spent 500$/€ more than the rest of computers only to have a fancy apple
picture on the box"
;-)
cheers
-r
8 Jun
8 Jun
10:58 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
2009/5/28 Asmo Koskinen
<asmo.koskinen(a)arkki.info>
I'm coming into this thread a bit late (behind on my email), but for
anyone interested in why latencies below 20ms can matter in recording,
take a nice digital delay -- I have a TC Electronics D-Two and a
Symmetrix 606 -- and setup a stereo slapback echo with it for vocals.
Set up a spread of about 10-20ms. Sounds nice, huh? Imagine how
wonderful that can sound between your tracks when you're not even
wanting it... :(
Usually it's not so obvious when the material isn't just the same sound
delayed, as it is between channels in a stereo delay, but it's still
annoying. You're playing time domain tricks with your tracks that you
hadn't even wanted.
--
+ Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ Physical Sciences Div. + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ James Franck Institute + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky
This time latency is 8 ms. Where, when and why
someone needs something
like 3 ms?
Here we aim at 1.6ms with the hope of at least 2.7ms
If you do monitoring and using real time fx while recording one or more
tracks with a mixing console then 8ms is really a bad latency. 
30 May
30 May
4:20 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Asmo Koskinen wrote:
Tom Dunstan kirjoitti:
I use Fedora10/CCRMA. I gave up on Ubuntu after I spent too much time fiddling and
not enough playing. I have virtually no XRuns at 2ms. The reason I need 2ms latency
is if I'm punching in using Ardour, especially recording a drum track, there can't
be
even a whiff of delay. All this using FFADO with a Ricoh ieee1394 chipset. (Echoaudio
AF12, btw).
-Scott
Asmo, you seem to be quite happy... any ideas?
Yes I am. Here is my laptop with Echo AudioFire4.
http://www.arkki.info/howto/Ubuntu_Studio/904_ffado_02.png
This time latency is 8 ms. Where, when and why someone needs something
like 3 ms? 
28 May
28 May
6:54 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
On Thursday 28 May 2009, Tom Dunstan wrote:
is anyone else having random lock ups with the
"2.6.28-3-rt #12-Ubuntu SMP
PREEMPT RT" kernel. i'm on a lenovo r61 and this kernel seems to freeze
randomly with no warning. Not worth the risk on audio recording or
performances, eek.
see here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=11350551
and for using an other Kernel here:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=311158
Gerhard
29 May
29 May
2:20 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Marcel Marti wrote:
I've reached latencies of 3 ms. with no trace of
xrun nor clicks in the
audio, while in Ubuntu I just could barely get close to 25 ms which was
insane. I cannot recommend anything else. Trust me.
I don't trust you :-) Well I trust you had bad experiences with 8.10 of
which I also heard bad things (still on 8.04 here).
I used to run debian with openbox, but when my last laptop died I
decided to try ubuntu 8.04 on the new one. I was very skeptic in the
beginning, but actually now I can't get the same performance with debian
(has it installed on a second partition) on the new laptop.
I even run gnome with compiz, and had stable RT performance with 10ms
latency over firewire. Can run lower, but at high performance the
clients start to misbehave.
My current feeling is that some of the general recommendations like
"stay away from gnome" and "ubuntu sucks for realtime audio"
apparently
aren't universally true.
And I must admit the point where hacking around on the box to *perhaps*
press latency a few ms is over for me. I make music (something I'm very
fond of), both live and recording/sequencing/softsynthing at home
without a hickup, and I didn't even compile the kernel myself.
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk http://virb.com/atte
3:07 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
It's all about the person in the chair..not the distro ;)
3:21 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Ray Rashif wrote:
It's all about the person in the chair..not the
distro ;)
And quite a bit about avoiding crappy hardware!
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk http://virb.com/atte
3:23 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Atte André Jensen
<atte.jensen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>.
My current feeling is that some of the general recommendations like
"stay away from gnome" and "ubuntu sucks for realtime audio"
apparently
aren't universally true.
I can use Gnome on my AMD64 Gentoo machine at any latency setting down
to 1-2mS without problems. I suspect my sound card (HDSP 9652) is one
of the bigger reason that it works.
- Mark
4:44 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Don't get me wrong. I use Ubuntu for everything else and I am extremly happy
with it. I have installed more than 10 Linux operating systems to different
people I know after convince them of its virtues and I've always chosen
Ubuntu. Because it's clear, stable, well managed, the system package is very
efficient,... but for audio production I had to look further.
Unless of course that you are very lucky with hardware (I've got a Presonus
FP10 wich works well with Linux) and you have the time and knowledge to
compile the kernel, the sound server and the applications yourself it is
very likely that you have to work at a very high latencies.
And let's be realistic: who the hell likes to play a virtual instrument when
it sounds a bit delayed?
Btw, I think that a distro that misses an RT kernel twice is not a serious
audio oriented distro.
2009/5/29 Mark Knecht <markknecht(a)gmail.com>
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Atte André Jensen
<atte.jensen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>.
My current feeling is that some of the general recommendations like
"stay away from gnome" and "ubuntu sucks for realtime audio"
apparently
aren't universally true.
I can use Gnome on my AMD64 Gentoo machine at any latency setting down
to 1-2mS without problems. I suspect my sound card (HDSP 9652) is one
of the bigger reason that it works.
- Mark
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
30 May
30 May
10:15 a.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Marcel Marti wrote:
... I think that a distro that misses an RT kernel twice is not a
serious audio oriented distro.
Agree++.
The exchange over this topic has been quite timely for me. I've received
an offer to write articles for a magazine dedicated to Ubuntu, and I
find myself in a dilemma. I've installed Intrepid, Hardy, 64 Studio 3
beta (based on Hardy), and Jaunty w. Ubuntu Studio. I've had serious
problems with every one of them, and not only on my laptop.
Yesterday I installed 8.10 (i386) on my 2nd production box, then I
proceeded to the online upgrade to Jaunty. Everything went well, then I
installed the Ubuntu Studio meta packages. At first I thought everything
was okay, then I ran into an old problem. At some point it became
impossible to close anything, e.g. terminal window, running programs,
even the session. I ran into exactly the same problem on my laptop when
I originally installed 8.10 there. I reported it, as did many other
users, yet here it is still, annoying as ever. In fact, almost every
problem I encountered in 8.10 is still present. Frustration leads me to
wonder whether the devs ever even read the forums. (I'm sure they do,
but why this persistence of well-known issues ?)
Is Ubuntu development really this bad ? I find it hard to believe that
such great efforts towards desktop improvements have overshadowed sheer
workability. At this point I'm looking for a replacement for the UStudio
default rt kernel, perhaps that will alleviate the problem, but one
thing is certain: As it exists now, I can't recommend Ubuntu Studio in
good faith. Too much extra work is required to make it work, and the
remaining performance problems simply obviate its utility.
Btw, the partitioner worked fine, but it reduced the disk space for my
previous JAD installation by so much that I was unable to log in until I
made more space in /home.
UStudio looks great. If it performed as well as it looks I'd have no
hesitancy about recommending it.
Best,
dp
10:52 a.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Dave Phillips kirjoitti:
Is Ubuntu development really this bad ?
UStudio looks great. If it performed as well as it looks I'd have no
hesitancy about recommending it.
Why is my experience so different?
I do use Ubuntu as a TV (Mythbuntu), as a thin client server
(LTSP/Edubuntu - actually two servers and over 100 thin clients), as a
desktop (i386), as a DAW (x86_64), as a Flumotion server, as a desktop
(UNR) on eee 701, 900 and HP Mini 2133... My N800 do not use Ubuntu...
To me Ubuntu is Debian based very flexible (just like Debian itself)
modern distro, that I can put every machine I use/maintain.
Best Regards Asmo Koskinen.
11:13 a.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Dave Phillips kirjoitti:
The exchange over this topic has been quite timely for
me. I've received
an offer to write articles for a magazine dedicated to Ubuntu, and I
find myself in a dilemma.
[--]
At this point I'm looking for a replacement for
the UStudio
default rt kernel, perhaps that will alleviate the problem
Is situation really that bad here - everyone should learn first
everything about real time kernel and then cook something very own?
Dave, why not contact directly Alessio about your problems and about
your article - he knows real time kernel on Ubuntu.
"At the moment in Ubuntu I'm maintaining the realtime kernel flavour. I
have provided a realtime flavour for Feisty as external debian
repositary, for Gutsy directly in official archives, Hardy until to the
last Jaunty. For this effort I'm joined to Ubuntu Kernel Team (thanks
BenC). I'm also member of the Ubuntu Studio Team which use realtime
kernel as fundamental piece."
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlessioIgorBogani
Best Regards Asmo Koskinen.
31 May
31 May
11:24 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
On Saturday 30 May 2009 04:15:51 am Dave Phillips wrote:
Marcel Marti wrote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave FYI:
Refer to the Ubuntu Studio list commencing from April to current date.
ubuntu-studio-users(a)lists.ubuntu.com
There has been a lot team trouble and restructuring of goals.
Hope this is of use.
Tom
... I think that a distro that misses an RT
kernel twice is not a
serious audio oriented distro.
Agree++.
The exchange over this topic has been quite timely for me. I've received
an offer to write articles for a magazine dedicated to Ubuntu, and I
find myself in a dilemma. I've installed Intrepid, Hardy, 64 Studio 3
beta (based on Hardy), and Jaunty w. Ubuntu Studio. I've had serious
problems with every one of them, and not only on my laptop.
Yesterday I installed 8.10 (i386) on my 2nd production box, then I
proceeded to the online upgrade to Jaunty. Everything went well, then I
installed the Ubuntu Studio meta packages. At first I thought everything
was okay, then I ran into an old problem. At some point it became
impossible to close anything, e.g. terminal window, running programs,
even the session. I ran into exactly the same problem on my laptop when
I originally installed 8.10 there. I reported it, as did many other
users, yet here it is still, annoying as ever. In fact, almost every
problem I encountered in 8.10 is still present. Frustration leads me to
wonder whether the devs ever even read the forums. (I'm sure they do,
but why this persistence of well-known issues ?)
Is Ubuntu development really this bad ? I find it hard to believe that
such great efforts towards desktop improvements have overshadowed sheer
workability. At this point I'm looking for a replacement for the UStudio
default rt kernel, perhaps that will alleviate the problem, but one
thing is certain: As it exists now, I can't recommend Ubuntu Studio in
good faith. Too much extra work is required to make it work, and the
remaining performance problems simply obviate its utility.
Btw, the partitioner worked fine, but it reduced the disk space for my
previous JAD installation by so much that I was unable to log in until I
made more space in /home.
UStudio looks great. If it performed as well as it looks I'd have no
hesitancy about recommending it.
Best,
dp
1 Jun
1 Jun
4:54 a.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
Thomas Fisher kirjoitti:
Refer to the Ubuntu Studio list commencing from
April to current date.
ubuntu-studio-users(a)lists.ubuntu.com
There has been a lot team trouble and restructuring of goals.
"Personally, it's been a contributing factor to my stepping down after
Jaunty. I've felt like "What's the point?" Users only complain when
things don't work and rarely help to fix them."
[--]
"So, what do you guys want? What are you willing to do? Everything is
*WIDE* open at this point."
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/2009-April/004507.html
And then there was a long discuss about Ubuntu Studio.
Cory stepped down, all others in the team are here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/TeamStructure
Maybe Debian, 64 Studio, Musix or CCRMA have much more stable and active
community around them, I really do not know. Right now Ubuntu Studio is
not so strong, I think.
Best Regards Asmo Koskinen.
31 May
31 May
11:32 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com>wrote;wrote:
Is Ubuntu development really this bad ?
Just for another data point. I've stuck with 8.04 due mostly to laziness and
the fact that it's working fine. I use the stock rt kernel. The only real
tinkering I've had to do is build jack-rack from source since the stock
ubuntu 8.04 version won't read or save racks. I get down to around 11ms
latency in jack and I'm happy enough with that - I never notice any delay
even when I'm playing guitar live. I know there are some cool new features
that I'm missing and especially I know that I'm using a version of jackd
that Paul has said is awful, but it works for me and as someone else
mentioned, at some point you've got to be making music.
Regards,
Bill
10 Jun
10 Jun
6:14 p.m.
New subject: ubuntu realtime.
On Sat, 30 May 2009, Dave Phillips wrote:
Is Ubuntu development really this bad ? I find it hard
to believe that
such great efforts towards desktop improvements have overshadowed
sheer workability.
On the bright side, the Ubuntu Studio wallpaper and GDM themes are
awe-inspiring. (Let's hear it for polishing the chrome!)
--
+ Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ Physical Sciences Div. + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ James Franck Institute + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky
5445
days inactive
5459
days old
linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
23 comments
14 participants
participants (14)
-
Asmo Koskinen -
Atte André Jensen -
Bill Allen -
Brent Busby -
Dave Phillips -
Gerhard Zintel -
Marcel Marti -
Mark Knecht -
Raffaele Morelli -
Ray Rashif -
Scott -
Thomas Fisher -
Thomas Kerstgens -
Tom Dunstan