Linux-audio-dev November 2004

linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

95 participants
87 discussions

Re: [linux-audio-dev] 3D fft analysis program

by Downer

> I'm hoping that you're thinking of a realtime display, in which the > peaks roll off to create a true waterfall effect. Baudline (http://www.baudline.com) is a fantastic viewer that does fft cascade. I've used it for a couple of years, and it is great for figuring out how different sounds "work", and it has an oscilloscope-type display as well. Cheers, Jason Downer

18 years, 4 months

[linux-audio-dev] Drum synth

by Dmitry Baikov

Hello. I finally started making my pet music project and realized I need a drum synth to make some cool sounds. psindustrializer is good but also need some tr-909-style sounds. I remeber from my old windoze days I used a nice piece of software called Stomper. Does anybody know any software for linux with comparable capabilities? Or we need to write one? Stomper does not work under wine :( Thanks.

18 years, 4 months

[linux-audio-dev] Re: Drum synth

by Juhana Sadeharju

Hello. I had a couple of articles on drum synths. Check ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/audio/devel/lad/drumsynth/ I built the circuit in a00*.jpg at the time when this article was fresh. The article b00*jpg mentions an earlier article. I will check that out at library. Hmm.. I coded a drum synth for Commodore VIC-20 at the time. VIC provided an audio chip with three oscillators, noise, and a common volume if I remember correctly. What I did was to modulate osc pitch and volume parameters with a fast and accurate (compared to Basic) assembly code. The drum sounds were assigned to the keys. This was about 1984, inspired by Yamaha's digital RX drum synths, not by analog drums. Juhana -- http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-graphics-dev for developers of open source graphics software

18 years, 4 months

Re: [linux-audio-dev] impulse convolution LADSPA plugin

by Stefan Turner

Hi Steve, thanks for the reply. I will definitely look into using DSSI, looks like it could be good once as supported as LADSPA is (I'd never even heard of it before your post, although that's probably just me). Is it intended as an eventual LADSPA replacement? I never really saw the need to divide plugins into 'instruments' and 'effects', and it seems like DSSI can do both. Stefan Turner > It would be more practical to do it as a DSSI plugin, LADSPA has no way > to > indicate that you want to load files during runtime, and no UI. > > In DSSI you can load the impulse in the "UI" process, perform the FFT > on > it and send it ot hte DSP code with configure(). Once there the DSP > code > can the overlap-add/save on it. > > - Steve ___________________________________________________________ Win a castle for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

19 years, 4 months

[linux-audio-dev] Firewire Audio Card Support

by Olaf Christ

Hi, as the owner of a firewire audio card (Motu 828mkII) I was disappointed when trying to use it under linux. Asking Motu to provide tech docs and/or linux drivers is useless: "We will possibly release linux drivers in the future, but we never release any kind of technical documentation." Is there any effort to join forces for putting pressure on the manufacturers yet? I am willing to create an address list ordered by audio card manufacturer/model to make the manufacturers realize there is a need for linux support. Any comments? Olaf On Thursday 18 November 2004 14:01, derek holzer wrote: > Of course, the Firewire subsystem for Linux works fine. But AFAIK there > are no drivers existing for any firewire audio cards. Bug the various > manufacurers to release more technical info and they might eventually > show up. > > d. > > Victor LaLoggia wrote: > > Hello Frank; > > > > Thank you for your response, and I do not mean to be contrary, but what > > about the work the folks at http://www.linux1394.org/ are doing? > > > > I see that their subsystem has been included Linux kernel sources since > > version 2.3.40. Does the subsystem not work? > > > > Thanks, > > vic > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frank Barknecht <fbar(a)footils.org> > > Sent: Nov 15, 2004 12:14 PM > > To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu > > Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Using Linux Laptop for Live Performance > > > > Hallo, > > > > Victor LaLoggia hat gesagt: // Victor LaLoggia wrote: > >> I am just beginning my research into the available software and > >> hardware, and would greatly appreciate any information. Especially > >> on hardware - what would be the best usb/ firewire interface for > >> live performance? > > > > No Firewire audio yet on Linux. The best in your case is PCMCIA, which > > has the lowest latency. VX-Pocket or RME cards are good choices. Also > > try, if your internal soundcard is enough. > > > > Ciao

19 years, 9 months

[linux-audio-dev] adm: list archives at eca.cx going away

by Kai Vehmanen

Hello, this is not an urgent issue, but I'd like to warn in advance that the laa/lad/lau list archiving at www.eca.cx/la[adu] will stop some time next year. I'm not sure of the exact date, but sooner or later anyway. Note that I'm not going to take the existing archives offline, so all links pointing to mails at eca.cx will still work. Fortunately we nowadays have many other archives of the lists. We just now need to pick a new official archive and update the links at: http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/archive.php3 I propose that we use the archives at columbia.edu: http://www.music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/ ... and so on. Very good archives can also be found at gmane.org: http://gmane.org/info.php?group=gmane.linux.audio.devel ... and so on. -- http://www.eca.cx Audio software for Linux!

19 years, 9 months

[linux-audio-dev] RME is no more

by Marek Peteraj

Hi all, sorry for crossposting, just wanted to let everybody know: The official statement is that there will be no support for ALSA (Linux) FireWire drivers from RME. In other words there will be no such drivers, as it is impossible to write them without tons of hardware and software documentation from RME. And we won't share these information with anyone. Regards Matthias Carstens RME No further explanations. The moral of this story is: Never buy a product that isn't already supported in ALSA, such as i did. :( There's no guarantee even if pretty much every other card from the same manufacturer *is* already supported. Me and Benno talked to Matthias personally during Musikmesse, he was friendly and seemed to be open with regards to future cooperation with oss developers. Seems like things have changed dramatically since then. Marek

19 years, 9 months

[linux-audio-dev] ladspa 2 idea

by Taybin Rutkin

I don't know if this is completely dead or just a little dead but I had an idea today. It'd be kinda neat if there was a mechanism for grouping related control ports together in the UI. Taybin

19 years, 10 months

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more

by Marek Peteraj

On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 23:17, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 00:34:17 +0100, Marek Peteraj <marpet(a)naex.sk> wrote: > <SNIP> > > 2. I can only understand the point of view of open source developers > > here, since they also invested an awfull lot of time (and money that > > they didn't get back!) into developing linux audio applications, many of > > which are state-of-art at least with respect to technology. And they're > > free as in beer/speech. > > That was their choice. Right? Sure but the result is the _same_ with respect to what they deliver(state of art technology), which has the same value for me. Not the same with respect to what you get in the end.(a non-functioning device you paid a lot for, just because this and that) > > > That said i really don't understand the point of view of those few how > > actually kindof defend the position of RME (or any other manufacturer in > > a similar position), no offense intended. > > RME's position, and I am only guessing here, is that they would be > happy to release info to the Open Source community __IF__ that > information didn't help their competitors develop hardware that > competed with RME. How? To achieve 1ms less latency? > It is natural for people who have spent money to > want to protect it's value. We are that way with our own purchases, > correct? I (and I think you...) would not be happy if I bought > something and then it stopped working, Worse. It actually never worked in my case. > or if the company you bought it > from stopped supporting it. Worse. They never did in my case. > RME is the same way. They invest hundreds > of thousands, if not millions of Euro's developing new hardware ideas. Hence the analogy with oss developers. They do that too without being cowards and misers. > They create software to support it and make it work. Then all the > technical information goes into the public domain and some low cost > manufacturer from Taiwan or Russia or somewhere else knocks off a copy > and sells it for 1/2 the price. No one buys RME hardware, RME doesn't > make money and goes out of business. Did this happen? See how many RME cards are supported. Almost all. Perhaps all except fireface. Did someone from russia or taiwan knock-off a copy? Does RME suffer from us having alsa drivers? Are russian engineers or taiwanese engineers(envy24 btw AFAIK) not smart enough to come up with their own superb design? Is it too hard for smart people to reverse-engineer? In other words - what are you talking about? > > What's so hard to understand? Pretty much everything. Considering that they have used proprietary protocols in their hammerfall series anyway. > > Which seems like it's the beginning of end for linux pro-audio hw > > support if we don't fight for it. Right now it concerns just me, but it > > might concern everyone in the near future. > > This I agree with, but the best way to fight for it (speaking as a > business man) is to develop a real market for it. We need thousands of > buyers. Develop the market and hardware manufacturers will come. Perhaps it's here already. I think there's more of us RME or M-Audio customers than one might think. Marek

19 years, 10 months

Re: Behringer [was Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] RME is no more]

by Marek Peteraj

On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 13:35, R Parker wrote: > --- Marek Peteraj <marpet(a)naex.sk> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 23:21, Lee Revell wrote: > > > On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 16:22 -0600, Jan Depner > > wrote: > > > > Man, I've been waiting all day for someone to > > say this. Personally, > > > > open source is not a religion for me so a closed > > source driver would be > > > > fine and dandy. Let the flames commence - now > > where did I put my > > > > asbestos underwear? > > > > > > Eh, it's a slow day, I'm bored. But I mean it > > 100%. Flame away... > > > > > > So, the next question is, what would it take to > > make a closed source > > > driver happen? They should start the bidding on > > alsa-devel at "one free > > > FireFace"... > > > > Lee and Jan, > > > > i talk to you as an owner of fireface. :) > > > > I really like the philosophy of not letting any > > closed source drivers > > into the kernel. In the end i only saw people upset > > because their XY > > nvidia or ATI driver wasn't working. Besides they'd > > need to provide it > > themselves, which means a lot more money than just > > handing out > > documentation or perhaps one free unit. > > > > My point of view - either open source alsa driver, > > or i'll just sell > > that unit. And now that they have accused me of > > causing damage to RME > > specifically because of this thread, i can only say, > > i'll stay away from > > any of their products. Speaking of damage, i'd like > > to see a slashdot > > story about this so that 30.000 people can judge for > > themselves. :) > > I really hope you don't do that. My intention wasn't to post that on /. at least not now. I was thinking out loud. Of course, in case we did a market survey it would definitely be needed. > RME has provided > "Pro" grade audio hardware when Linux Audio needed it > in order to become a legitimate alternative to > proprietary solutions. Not really. It was Paul, Thomas, and one other guy(don't remember the name) who did. Remember it was almost no investment from RME's side. They got a lot of units sold in return and built a very good reputation based on that fact and this went beyond the linux audio world i believe. > I hope you consider how much > work has gone into Linux Audio But that's what i'm talking about. So much effort, oustanding technologies(although i know the authors won't admit ;) and they(hw manufacturers) don't care! > and how difficult it is > to develop that type of business relationship. There is no relationship. The only real manufacturer from the POV of linux audio is audioscience(.com), which unfortunately does only broadcast hw. They do ALSA drivers, provide support and invest their time and money in doing so. They deserve highest respect for that considering the current situation. That's how it should be. And this is what we should fight for. > > Whether you are in the right or wrong, is it > inconcievable for you to act for the interests of many > people by selling the unit and getting something else? Not sure i understand. I'm about to sell my fireface copy as i declared previously. Of course if there's any way i could help out other people here in keeping the unit, i'm prepared to do so. Marek

19 years, 10 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-dev November 2004