ametro 0.4 - ALSA MIDI Metronome
********************************
This program is a little, simple MIDI Metronome using the ALSA sequencer,
made in Kylix (Object Pascal) and using ALSAPAS: ALSA Library Bindings for
Pascal.
Bug reports and comments are welcome.
Sources, binary and RPM packages for Mandrake 9.1 are available here:
http://perso.wanadoo.es/plcl/ametro/ametro-en.htmlhttp://alsapas.alturl.com
Enjoy!
Hi,
Anyone knows whether there is any way to decode .ape files in Linux? I believe
there is an xmms plugin lying around somewhere: any other decoder one might
use?
Thanks,
S.M.
A question from a newbie:
I have a Soundbalster mp3+ usb sound card attached to my HP laptop running
Redhat 9. It works great and I was amazed at how easy it was to get it
going, worth a look for those after a USB sound card.
However I have discovered problems when I record with it. Any recording I
make is full of little skips, more skips if I record at higher qualities.
I am using sox to both play and record.
Any insights?
Will
Hello!
Like the subject line says, I'm a newcomer, this is my first post on
this list. So, hiyall =) Also, forgive my faulty English. (and the long
rant, possibly even a bit OT too)
When I found Shaketracker I was bouncing with the joy, until I tried to
compile it. There aren't so many good music apps for linux and
especially not too many tracker-like midi apps. I really like the
tracker UI but I can't seem to find good 'classical'
instruments(samples) for trackers. I have good midi instruments, but I
dearly hate the input system almost all midi composing tools have
adopted. So Shaketracker was what I had been looking for some time...
and like I said, I couldn't get it to compile.
At this point I didn't try to fix it myself, because usually with some
googling you'll find out someone else has made a patch or there is
actually a new version of the software which compiles etc. So, after
googling, I had only found other people who had the same problems. I
took a hammer and began fixing it myself with not-so-optimistic
feelings.
I got it working though, it was mostly namespace problems, some code
changes here and there. I still gives warnings but compiles and
runs(works) on my RedHat 9.0 system. So, someone still struggling with
this problem, I have got a patch for you to try out =)
- SampoV
__
Ota itsellesi luotettava kotimainen email http://www.jippii.fi/
Tutustu samalla netin parhaaseen pelipaikkaan JIPPIIGAMESIIN.
This is a little off-topic, but I hope you don't mind. I get quite a
lot of noise from my soundcard. There is a pulsing that sounds
something like a very fast morse code at a consistent pitch, and it's
unacceptably loud. I notice variations in this noise based on how I
move my mouse.
At first I thought this was just because of my shoddy 5-year-old
Soundblaster Live, but I have a new Audiophile 2496 and it does the same
thing.
Today I tried removing the stereo mini plug from my soundcard and
touching it to the metal on my case. The sound was nearly identical.
>From the little that I know about electronics, I conclude that the
problem is voltage fluctuations in the metal of the case. Does this
mean my case needs to be grounded somehow?
What can I do to fix this problem?
Josh
>> I suggest that you take your electricity for the computer and amplifier
>> and all that get's physically connected to them from one grounded outlet.
>> And beware if you have antennas connected to the system, they give ground
>> loop humming also.
>
>I tried putting everything on the same power strip and I still get the
>noise. I have a mixer and an amplifier that the signal is going
>through, and I get the same noise going:
Just because you are plugged into a three prong outlet doesn't mean it's grounded. Sometimes when electrical outlets are wired, the ground connection isn't actually grounded and is useless. Sometimes power strips have a little light on it to show if it is actually grounded or not. Also, cheap power conditioners can help alot. (Rack Rider for instance)
Self,
> From: Mark Knecht [mailto:mknecht@controlnet.com]
>
> > > Sorry. Not clear. I listen a lot to jazz fusion, like John
> > Scofield or John
> > > McLaughlin, or then a lot of prog rock stuff like Spock's Beard or
> >
> > Sorry.
>
> You're sorry I listen to Spock's Beard? ;-)
> (Sometimes I am. I'm such a dinosaur...)
:} I'm not much on fusion... McLaughlin's alright. Most of it just strikes me as too dense, overly complex ...somewhat masturbatory on the part of the artist. It's not always bad... some folk do it well.
To tell you the truth... I've not actually heard Spocks Beard.
> > Are you seeing "legacy" as bad? ...Somehow limiting?
>
> No, not at all.
Sometimes I think the way folk today constantly reference {borrow from} the past is a bit detrimental. ...Keeps them stuck in the past. I always figured the past was something to be learned from and left behind.
> > I tend to wonder why folk reference past movements that way.
> > {Like Billy Ray Cyrus, or whoever happens to be todays twang pop
> > superstar, calling themselves a "country" singer or whatever...}
>
> I don't know, but this sort of issue is out there all over the place. Not
> just in music. (Look at the media today with the labels 'left' and 'right')
> People here in the U.S. seem interested, or at least comfortable, aligning
> themselves with names of things, and far less interested or comfortable at
> just looking or listening and deciding how they feel about someone's work.
I wonder why folk want to live within labels. Labels are so you can organize you cd collection. Not that I've not adopted a few myself. It's just that... take country, for instance... why do artists tend to drag that whole thing out rather than taking it upon themselves to deviate from it as much as the folk who made "country" {the core folk} managed to deviate from what was around at the time?
Why are they content with simply mimicking the earlier or defining aspects of whatever movement? Do they actually think that country or metal or punk or whatever else came about that way?
Back to your point... I like lots of different movements... I may borrow from lots of different movements... no way in hell I'd ever create within or for a specific movement. Why do people do this?
> > > I hope this helps explain my point of view a bit, even if it is out of
> > > touch.
> >
> > :} Not really...
>
> Not really explaining my point of view, or not really out of touch? ;-)
Your point of view could have used a bit of clarification.
> > These days I think it might be the ideations of
> > the producer that matters. It would seem that some sort of late
> > seventies nostalgia has grasped us by the sensibilities in the
> > past few years.
>
> Interesting observation. Not sure I agree, but certainly worth some thought.
Technophiles and disco kiddies... :} they're all around us.
> > Maybe it's a pre-revolutionary sphincter convulsion sort of
> > thing... maybe it's the result of some secretive neo-conservative
> > underground... who knows?
> >
>
> Not exactly a Bush-Chaney support I'd guess. ;-)
Not exactly. I don't really have a problem with Bush... He's not done all that badly given what he's had to deal with. I think he's gotten a bit hawkish of late. I wouldn't rule out voting for him.
Hi
Does anyone know if it's legal to:
* sample the grandpiano of the latest Roland/Korg/Yamaha electric piano
* give the sample away
* package it (sf2) and put it on my web site
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
Hi,
I'm not clear if this is possible at all. Can someone explain how I
might make a .asoundrc file that would only allow applications that use
OSS emulation to access specific playback channels.
Currently any app that uses OSS emulation drives all 26 playback
channels on my HDSP 9652. This causes two problems:
1) Since my hardware mixes the 26 inputs into 2 stereo output pairs, the
output over-drives if the 26 inputs are loud.
2) Any app using OSS emulation blocks all other apps using OSS
emulation.
What would be great, if it can be done, is to create a sort of
'virtual OSS' device in .asoundrc that only drove specific Alsa playback
channels, so that Mozilla, for instance, talked to a specific entry in
.asoundrc and ended up only driving two specific playback channels, like
playback_22 and playback_23.
I would be willing to live with a requirement that all OSS apps had
to use the same sampling rate or blocking would occur. That's not an
issue for me.
Is anything like this possible with Alsa?
Thanks,
Mark
The free sampled piano is here:
http://theremin.music.uiowa.edu/MIS.html (click on the Piano link)
It is quite large, abot 1.5GB (each note sampled individually in 3
velocities: pp, mf, ff).
I do not know how good the quality of this piano is, Steve Harris
hacked together a small player and posted some mp3s that were rendered
from a MIDI file driving his application.
To me it does not sound that great, perhaps you need to tune
the velocity splits to make it sound well.
Anyway this sampleset is really large and can hardly fit into RAM.
SF2 was not created to be streamed from disk thus I suggest the following.
We of the linuxsampler team made significant progress in .GIG playback
thanks to the wonderful work done by Christian S.
He actually wrote libgig which is able to parse and load .GIG file
supporting all the articulation stuff (layering, key/velocity switching,
dimensions etc).
see our new webpage (thanks Marek ;-) )
http://www.linuxsampler.org
(the new code is not online yet, because Christian and I are fixing bugs
and optimizing the streaming).
I cannot make forecasts when full GIG playback will be done, but shortly
(1-2 weeks) we will release a version that can play back the samples
(without effects, and envelopes for now).
This means we will soon be able to play the MIS piano directly streamed
from disk using LinuxSampler.
So the advice to Atti and others is:
One of you should use a Windows app which allows you to create .GIG
files (with GigaStudio being the natural choice), download the MIS
samples, tune volume, velocity-splits, trim samples (some samples have a
bit of silence at the beginning etc) and make a .GIG file out of it.
After the piano sounds good in GigaStudio you should post it online.
That way as soon as LinuxSampler is ready (the piano sample does not
require filters, envelopes etc) we can release a truly free
Grandpiano in software (samples + player).
To compare how well the MIS piano .GIG you will create ,sounds I suggest
you to use this page:
http://www.af.lu.se/~fogwall/piano.html
On that page you find a classical music midi file
Fantaisie-Impromptu (Chopin)
and the corresponding audio clips rendered with various
digital pianos, hardware expanders and software samples
(including VST The Grand, various multi-Gigabyte piano samples for
Gigasampler etc).
Not sure about the quality we can achieve, for example the MIS piano
does not include pedal down samples.
IANAPP (I am not a piano player) so I do not know if this is a big
disadvantage that makes it sound unprofessional.
Worth a try anyway.
What do you think ?
cheers,
Benno
>> * sample the grandpiano of the latest Roland/Korg/Yamaha electric >piano
>> * give the sample away
>> * package it (sf2) and put it on my web site
>>
> if you are prepared to go through all the pain of trimming and looping
> zillions of samples, why not do the real thing ?
> there is a raw set of steinway grand samples floating around on the net
> somewhere (was even announced to this list iirc), and i think it's even
> an anechoic recording.
> the license was something along the lines of "free for the taking".