My wife is the comptroller for a US Navy activity. She is the ultimate hard-core Excel user ;-) Neither Open Office nor Gnumeric can handle the macros that she uses.
Jan
-----Original Message-----
From: "linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu" <linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu> on behalf of "John Bleichert" <syborg(a)earthlink.net>
Sent: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:46:31 -0500 (EST)
To: "A list for linux audio users" <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
Subject: RE: Is the Linux desktop really here ? was: Re: [linux-audio-user]ebayguy: looks like he figured it out
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 eviltwin69(a)cableone.net wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> The one thing that I would do (I had to do this for my wife because she has to have Excel for her job) is to buy Crossover Office and Crossover plugin so that you can load Micro$oft Orifice and some nice browser plugins. It's well worth the 70 bucks and then they don't have to worry about format problems. Of course, you do have to own a copy of Micro$oft Orifice first ;-) Do you get the feeling that I'm not a big fan of Micro$oft ;-D
>
> Jan
>
Bull. For a standard desktop user, flash and java work fine in Mozilla.
I've moved half my family over to Slackware/Mozilla/OpenOffice for the
same reasons the O.P. is doing it. It works fine for all of them, nearly
bulletproof. I've even convinced my Sister (with the help of my nephew) to
use Mozilla for web and email and OO on her XP laptop. Been doing fine for
a year now.
Unless the target user is a really hardcore MS Office user, there is
nothing they'll need CodeWeavers for. If they are, that's a different
story. Just my 2 pfennig.
Sorry for the OT follow-up.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu" <linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu> on behalf of "Dave Phillips" <dlphilp(a)bright.net>
> Sent: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 08:39:40 -0500
> To: "A list for linux audio users" <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
> Subject: Is the Linux desktop really here ? was: Re: [linux-audio-user] ebayguy: looks like he figured it out
>
> tim hall wrote:
>
> >PS: Watching my nine-year old and various friends use my system, I'd say the
> >Linux Desktop for casual users is here, given the availability of technical
> >support. IMX it's the configuration that is difficult, not the installation &
> >usage.
> >
> >
> Hi Tim:
>
> A few days ago I wrote to the list and recounted a story about setting
> up a Windows 2000 system for some
> very non-computer-savvy friends of mine. Well, that saga knows no end: I
> had to go to their house yesterday
> and get it going for them again. It's true that they are *really* in the
> dark about their machine, but it's got so
> ridiculous that I've decided on a new plan. I'm going to set up a Linux
> box for them and see how they do with it.
> These people do very little else but use a Web browser (what they call
> "the computer") so I want to see just how
> hard or easy it would be for them to use a modern Linux system. It'll be
> an interesting experiment, and if I have to deal
> with the system at least it will be a real OS with real tools and the
> real possibility of actually fixing it if it breaks.
> Win2K is nice, but what a vacant system ! I can't believe people have
> paid so much and received so little in return
> for their money.
>
> Anyway, if this experiment works I'll report back to this group. The
> folks using this box aren't music/sound people,
> but I do plan on setting up XMMS, RealPlayer, and possibly xine or
> Mplayer for on-line video feeds. Let me know if
> you have any suggestions for making it as easy as possible for them to use.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dave Phillips
>
>
// John Bleichert
// syborg(a)earthlink.net
hi everyone!
this list has been very busy lately with off-topic exchanges on linux
(and windows!) applications and their respective advocacy in general.
the off-topic traffic seems to be drowning the audio-related discussions.
i don't really mind and it's not up to me do decide, but i'd like to ask
you to consider all the folks out there with crammed inboxes who thought
they were subscribing to an audio list ;)
in any case, the discussions (whether on-topic or not) show what a nice
place lau has become, and how much people like to hang out and just chat
about anything. ;) take my comment as a suggestion only, if you feel you
need to reply, consider to do it in private mail, and for a quick chat
about not-so-on-topic things with your linux audio pals, try #lad at
freenode.org. (and come to karlsruhe and to linuxconf.au and to linuxtag
next year, of course!)
all the best,
jörn
--
Happy Birthday, Professor !
Noam Chomsky, born Dec 7, 1928
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Kurfürstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany
http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server)
http://www.linuxaudiodev.org (Linux Audio Developers)
Ok, I'm still trying to find out how to configure the
midiports of my Knoppix 3.3 system (how to find out
what the input/output device is in /dev)
And trying to see if my driver is Alsa or OSS.
There is no aconnect or kaconnect command.
No /dev/snd or /dev/sndstat or /proc/asound.
relevant entries from lsmod command are:
sb 7796
sb_lib 33550 [sb]
uart401 6052 [sb_lib]
sound 55276 [sb_lib uart401]
soundcore 3428 [sb_lib sound]
I didn't see anything relevant out of the long
/etc/modules.conf (if I need to post something
specific there, let me know...)
Help anyone? thanks...
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
Hi linux-audio-users,
I am a newbie in this list - so first of all hello to everybody! :-)
Can anybody give me some hints about my following problem?
I would like to record directly from my DAT recorder (48 kHz) via SPDIF.
As a greenhorn in harddisk recording I expect that there should be a way
to get an exact copy of the data on the tape with no input level / mixer
and no DA-AD conversion in between?!
Unfortunately so far I did not succeed in recording from the SPDIF-input
at all. I am just able to route the DAT signal to the analog line out by
setting its volume using alsamixer. But the SPDIF-in does not appear in
other mixers like kmix and the signal is not available in recording
programs like audacity or krecord. :-(
I am using:
- SuSE 8.2 / kernel 2.4.20 / i86
- alsa 0.9.0
- emu10k1
- Soundblaster live! rev. 4
Ciao,
HippiE
Hi
Let me start by saying that I'm running debian/unstable...
I suddenly needed to play a midi file for the first time in a looong
time. But it seems that the timidity-patches are not in unstable anymore...
What's the best and or easiest way to play midifiles (software only) in
high quality under debian?
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
>> I'm thinking some not very nice thoughts about Luminousity right now...
Well. After this case I don't want release anything under GPL.
We need GPL3 which requires the license and copyright info to be
available prior purchase or download. Then people could search for
the original software from the original author (the one who has
the copyright because the license and copyright cannot be modified).
Also, the source code should be made available without an extra
request. Now GPL requires that either source is made available or
it can be sent upon request. The latter condition should be removed.
Also, the original name should be preserved. The names of the
borrowed or modified software should be available prior purchasing.
For example, Audacity customers should know that Audacity is using
free software such as allegro, dlcompat, expat, iAVC, id3lib, libflac,
libid3tag, libmad, libnyquist, libogg, libresample, libsamplerate,
libsndfile, libvorbis, portaudio, portmixer, soundtouch, and wave++.
The guy should list the name Audacity and the whole above list
beside his own name.
The intellectual property should be respected! Like any scientific
paper lists the references, should the free software as well have
a "references" section. It could be enough that all copyrights are
kept intact, but I would like to see a "references" listing which
lists the URLs to the original and other software as well.
Everyone of us should also start referencing where we pick up
the ideas: journal papers, magazines, webpage, other software,
told by a friend, etc. Too many times I see that features are
copied from other software, but the software is not credited.
E.g., I have invented the "b" feature in Audacity, and if somebody
copies the feature to the Sound Forge or elsewhere, I would
like to read that the feature was copied from Audacity. Patents
are good in this context but they are too expensive for me.
We should respect IP some other way, like via good manners.
BTW, the guy did not edit the source code, but changed the name in the
screenshots with the image editor. This is considered as bad
both by advertising officials and by consumer officials because
one cannot advertise another product and sell other ("Audacity").
This case shows (from the feedback) that consumers are not able to
request good products and are easily fooled. Sad. It also shows
people don't think security issues at all. Who want to buy
software, executables, from a dishonest person?
Regards,
Juhana
Is there an equivelent app to this Windows program ? Are there any apps
under Linux that do smpte ot MTC reliabl yet ? I know that Muse
sequencer has a low grade implementation, but are there any others ?
Thanks.
>Is this fixed-time vs. fixed-size usb issue addressed in the 2.6 kernel
>(or is it alsa or is it something else)?
AFAIK its part of the USB spec. We are stuck with it :-)
Hi,
I recently read about the new MotU 828mkII (Firewire 8in/8out interface). This
sparked a enewed interest in Firewire and I looked around for other
interfaces. I found the Presonus Firestation (among others), it that seemed
to be very good value for money. (the MotU ain't bad either, but a bit on the
expensive side.)
A laptop + such an interface would in may opinion make a great pair!
So, does anyone have a clue if any of these are likely to work under linux
anytime soon?
The Firestation seems to use mLAN, I know I've seen talk about it here before.
I have no idea whether mLAN would make the chances better or worse ;).
/Robert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Cannam [mailto:cannam@all-day-breakfast.com]
>
> I can't comment on running either of those under Knoppix, except to
> say that I'm quite certain Knoppix 3.3 uses ALSA.
Actually by default (with a hd install) it doesn't.
http://www.knoppix.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2173#10717
There are a number of threads at knoppix.net talking about setting
up Alsa correctly after installing it yo your hard drive.
My experience (yours obviously will vary) suggests you may be better
off going with one of the really nice sound distros instead of knoppix
(planet ccrma, http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/ and
Agnula, http://www.agnula.org are the 2 I tried, I ended up with Agnula
(debian) for a bunch of little reasons)
Knoppix is great (My wife uses it on her laptop and I use it on an
old laptop without a harddrive, as an X client to my sound machine) but its
not very realtime sound app friendly, and I don't know enough super geek
stuff to make it so (not yet at least)
m.