Dear All,
I had just decided to give DeMuDi a try, I had decided this for simplicity
because now there's a beta available which comes as a single CD, that's
single instalation for OS (Debian) + music studio.
But I've just come accross this article:
http://www.debianplanet.org/node.php?id=831
entitled "An Unbiased Review of Debian 3.0". They say things like you are
supposed to know the name of your drivers (name of the files, not the name
of the hardware to be supported that usually comes as a description in a
database!). I've been very dissapointed to read this. I know that people
here who have recommended it say they had it running in little time and
effort, but is that due to you having quite some background?
I have installed Debian years ago, then Redhat recently. I've found Debian
installation a nightmare compared to Redhat, but I always thought it was a
matter of evolution with years. I don't know what to think anymore, the
article says pretty scary stuff actually in the areas that have
traditionally been grey in Linux (compared to our friend Windows).
Do you share these views and experiences? Will I need to figure out the
names of my files during install and stuff like that? (I definitely recall
having to do that with Debian but that was years ago.)
Many thanks.
Yours,
Alex
_________________________________________________________________
Descarga gratis la Barra de Herramientas de MSN
http://www.msn.es/usuario/busqueda/barra?XAPID=2031&DI=1055&SU=http%3A//www…
photoshop works under wine, a lot of stuff works under wine, but if you
look at cinepaint, it actually kicks photoshop's butt in terms of image
quality (which is why its used professionally in film editing), so often
times it turns out that the open source alternatives are better than
commercial software.
The only thing I have to dual boot for is to use flash, but I believe that
it runs under cross-over office, so there's just fewer and fewer reasons
to have to dual boot back to windows.
Hi
Being new to soundfonts I baically needed a decent piano soundfont for
arranging stuff for my students, but after shopping around, I thought it
maybe could be taken a step further. So my question is: Are soundfonts
good enough for "real" music production? And where can I find nice ones
to download? I guess I'm looking for imitations of real instruments,
mostly piano, accoustic drums and bass, but expressive strings and other
orchestral sounds would also be nice.
So far I found the "FluidR3 GM.SF2" (142M), how does that compare to
what's outthere? I also found alot of .sfArk sounds but it seems they
are in som kind of windows-only compressed format. I downloaded the
sfarkxtc_lx86.tar.gz but it complains "This file was created with sfArk
V1, and this program only handles sfArk V2+ files. Use sfArk instead."
on all the .sfArk-files I downloaded. Is there a linux utility that will
uncompress those files?
I run debian/unstable and plan on using fluidsynth and rosegarden if it
matters...
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
Hello,
I've finally found another CD player and tested the CD in question. It
played with no distortions!
Therefore, the very frequent clicks, which I thought could be just
clipping, are after all the results of playing a copy protected CD on a
computer with digital playback :(
I ripped it with cdparanoia, bnut cdparanoia found no errors, and the
sound was the same as when playing on the computer.
Of course I can borrow the CD player, take the analog output and
re-degitize, or search for a computer with spdif in and player with
spdif out. Are there any otehr ways of tackling the protection, so I can
hear the music copy that I bought on the device of my choice?
Yours, Mikhail Ramendik
Matthew Barber:
>
> ->My impression is that the more maths an audio professional knows, the
> more
> sure the audio professional is that higher sampling rates is a
> bad thing. (unless you are recording sounds that is later going to be
> downsampled a lot of course)
>
> Perhaps its impossible for us non-skilled-mathematicians to
> understand properly why 96 kHz is a bad thing...<-
>
>
>
> One thing 96K provides is plenty of headroom for aliasing if you're
> doing some kind of novel synthesis technique that tends to generate tons
> of high partials... the 24 bits are nice, too.
>
I was actually just thinking about 96kHz for recording/playback, not
processing. I guess I lost the context of the discussion.
--
BEAST/BSE version 0.6.2 is available for download at:
ftp://beast.gtk.org/pub/beast/v0.6/
or
http://beast.gtk.org/beast-ftp/v0.6/
This is a development version of BEAST/BSE, the BEdevilled Audio SysTem
and the Bedevilled Sound Engine. BEAST is a powerful music composition
and modular synthesis application released as free software under the
GNU GPL and GNU LGPL, that runs under unix.
The project is hosted at:
http://beast.gtk.org
A mailing list is available at:
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/beast/
This new development series of BEAST comes with a lot of
the internals redone, many new GUI features and a sound
generation back-end separated from all GUI activities.
Outstanding new features include support for skins, many sample
file formats, MIDI file import abilities, an improved piano roll
widget, the track editor which allows for easy selection of
synthesisers or samples as track sources, loop support in songs
and unlimited Undo/Redo capabilities.
Overview of Changes in BEAST/BSE 0.6.2:
* Rewrote scrollbar sizing, so tracks and parts are easily resizable
* Lots of small GUI enhancements and fixes
* Added CPU usage information view
* Enabled tooltips on menu items
* Rewrote logging, messaging and error reporting system
* Fixed attack time handling in SimpleADSR
* Added support for 1/32, 1/64 and 1/128 notes and quantization steps
* Added skin and row highlighting support to the pattern editor
* Adjusted skins (pacified some of the more disturbing ones)
* Added British English translation [Gareth Owen]
* Added Canadian English translation [Adam Weinberger]
* Added Brazilian Portuguese translation [Raphael Higino]
* Updated Catalan translation [Xavier Conde Rueda]
* Updated Czech translation [Miloslav Trmac]
* Updated Dutch translation [Tino Meinen]
* Updated Croatian translation [Robert Sedak]
* Updated Spanish translation [Francisco Javier F. Serrador]
* Updated Russian translation [Alexandre Prokoudine]
* Updated Portuguese translation [Duarte Loreto]
* Updated Albanian translation [Laurent Dhima]
* Various sfidl fixes [Stefan Westerfeld, Tim Janik]
* First steps taken towards mixer infrastrukture
* Fixed user configurable debugging support
* Lots of adaptions to GLib/Gtk+-2.4
--
-* Stefan Westerfeld, stefan(a)space.twc.de (PGP!), Hamburg/Germany
KDE Developer, project infos at http://space.twc.de/~stefan/kde *-
As we're on the subject of graphics today, does anyone have experience
of CD printers (the kind that print directly on to the disc surface)
under Linux, either thermal or inkjet? I think there's an Epson
inkjet one, which should be OK for a driver, but there's also a
really cheap USB thermal printer available, under the TDK brand I
think.
It seems to me that these would be ideal for an independent record
label producing CDs 'on demand' using a Linux box. We have all the
tools required to make good recordings, but they don't look too good
with the name scrawled in marker pen on the disc!
Cheers
Daniel
Still have some light "snap, crackle and pop" problems here. They don't
seem to be related to X-runs. I set Qjackctl in "Soft mode" but don't
know if that matters?
I have run this thing 8 ways 'till Sunday! Forget 96kHz! It does it
intermittently with Chorus on a single mixer channel in Ardour patched
in Qjackctl from the Mic preamp in 1 of the 1010 to the Ardour channel
with Chorus LADSPA plugin and then out to output 5 of the card and into
my mixer. I also run reverb in another channel with dedicated I/O's from
the sound card as I do with a delay. I have raised the buffer rates and
tried different (lower) sample rates. etc. I have /tmp setup as tmpfs
although Gnome system monitor does not always show that it is there?
I'm using the "default" setting in Qjackctl. I have not been able to get
a .asoundrc setup for HW:0 that gives me the 8 ins and outs. Would this
be part of the problem?
This is on an Asus A7V8X-MX SE Mobo with 2500 Athalon XP. 512M
Ram...Delta is the ONLY card in the PCI slots. Onboard audio disabled.
ALL unnecessary peripheral stuff turned off in BIOS. Delta on IRQ 10
with nothing but system devices on prior interrupts. All in Mandrake
10.0 running the tried and tested 2.4.22mm kernel. All being run as
root.
It is close in terms of quality but for this intermittent popping. I
have 2 gigs Saturday and am running out of ideas.
Desperately yours, ;/
Russell
It's the reason I keep a Mac around the house. Oh that and Pro Tools. When
is Ardour going to be interoperable with Pro Tools again?......
Matthew
> ----------
> From: RickTaylor(a)speakeasy.net
> Reply To: RickTaylor(a)speakeasy.net;A list for linux audio users
> Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2004 2:27 PM
> To: A list for linux audio users
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
>
> On 08-Jul-2004 Them wrote:
>
> } Don't count on it happening. And you don't need it on Linux anyway.
> }
> } I think Rosegarden or NoteEdit are good contenders, and don't cost you
> } $500.00. And Rosegarden works with JACK and LADSPA plugins, whereas
> } Finale does not. And Finale can't do LilyPond. Finale's PostScript
> } output option is a piece of junk, IMHO.
>
> It is sort of universally recognized as the best. IEEHO
>
> ----------------------------------
> E-Mail: RickTaylor(a)Speakeasy.Net
> Date: 08-Jul-2004
> Time: 13:24:09
>
> This message was sent by XFMail
> ----------------------------------
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
This email may contain confidential material.
If you were not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender and delete all copies.
We may monitor email to and from our network.
****************************************************************************
I have used Freeverb a lot in previous implementations of the CMT LADSPA
package and the last version of Ardour I was using was beta 11.1 I
think.
I am using Arodur beta 17.1 now and all other LADSAP plugs, including
those in the CMT package, seem to be working fine but the response of
Freeverb has changed...the reverb time is now very short and won't seem
to adjust beyond a shortish plate type reverb. Before you could get
super monsterous reverb tails if wanted.
Has anything changed in the Freeverb module? Is there something new in
the Ardour package that might be causing this? I notice some new panning
thingys and such.
ANY help would be much appreciated. I tried every other reverb out
there...Tom's (TAP-Plugs) comes close but Freeverb is the smoothest most
realistic I have heard for my needs.
Thanks
R~