Ruben Massy:
>
>Hello
>
>I actually use Andrew Morton's low latency patch for the linux kernel
>[1] with a 2.4.25, and I searched the www for a patch usable with the
>2.6 Linux kernel tree but I didn't found nothing...
>
>Is this one the more up-to-date, or does somebody know where I should
>find a patch for the 2.6 serie?
>
>And if there is no release avaible, does somebody know if some people is
>working on a low latency patch for the 2.6.x kernel, and how I could
>contact [him|her|them]?
Please check out the mailing list archives. Theres just been a _huge_
discussion about this in the lad/lau/jack/kernel mailing lists, not
to mention various discussions about this the last 2 years. For an
introduction, you can check out www.kernel-trap.org
--
Hi
I'm considering the Novation ReMote 25. Have anyone here made it work
succesfully with linux over usb? If so how?
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
http://plugin.org.uk/releases/0.4.7/
* Fixes to the build system, should now build OK!
* New plugin: Fast Lookahead Limiter, a 5ms attack, variable release time
lookahead limiter, superceeds the previous ones - do not use them, they had
critical bugs.
* Fixes to the "Pro-Logic" surround encoder from Prakash K. Cheemplavam.
The old lookahead limiters have been removed, please do not use them, the
are ireperably buggy.
This version will be required for the next JAMin release.
- Steve
oh man! I just now pushed the exact wrong button because I was interested
in reading about the 2.6 latency issues and somebody just posted a url to a
good discussion on the matter - but I permanently deleted it! would said
person be so kind as to say again? *laugh*
Hi.
I am Paul, the author of the software synthesizer
called ZynAddSubFX.
I made a pre-release version. Please get it from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/zynaddsubfx or
http://zynaddsubfx.sourceforge.net
News:
2.0.0_pre1 (17 Iul 2004)
- Added a new powerful synth engine which is
called PADsynth, you can
make very beautifull pads and even some strange sounds
- Now is used the XML format for all
zynaddsubfx parameters(.XMZ for
master parameters, .XIZ for instrument parameters and
.XSZ for scale
parameters).You can import older parameters. All
parameters files are
compressed with gzip algorithm.
- Some parameters has changed and you might
ecounter different sounds
that you saved in the older versions of zynaddsubfx
- The instrument banks are no longer single
files, but directories that
contains instrument .XIZ files (you can organize them
even with a file
manager). Also, you can use more than 1 banks easily.
- Added a new effect called DynamicFilter that
allows you to do
WahWah,AutoWah, VocalMorpher and other effects
- Speedups
- Started to write a small sequencer that
allows to load and play a
midi file from zynaddsubfx (unfinished)
- ZynAddSubFX is available from CVS, too.
Please look at the
sourceforge project page to get more information (
http://sourceforge.net/projects/zynaddsubfx )
- The waveform generator (OscilGen) has many
new parameters :) also if
you press the "Shift" key, you can draw the hamonics
amplitude/phases
- Many user interface improvements
- You can load a file at the start of the
program with "-l"
command-line parameter and you can run zynaddsubfx w/o
user interface with "-U"
- It is possible to dump all MIDI notes into a
text file
- The instruments can contain comments and
copyright information in
order to encourage sharing of them
- FFT3W library is supported
- More "randomness" options
- Other impovements
- Many, many bugfixes
- Added the full changelog (since I started to
write zynaddsubfx), most
is in Romanian
The documentation for this version is not written.
Please wait for a while
until I'll write it.
I recomand you to test the instruments, because I
added many new instruments.
Enjoy.
Paul
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Hello
I actually use Andrew Morton's low latency patch for the linux kernel
[1] with a 2.4.25, and I searched the www for a patch usable with the
2.6 Linux kernel tree but I didn't found nothing...
Is this one the more up-to-date, or does somebody know where I should
find a patch for the 2.6 serie?
And if there is no release avaible, does somebody know if some people is
working on a low latency patch for the 2.6.x kernel, and how I could
contact [him|her|them]?
Thank you,
Cheers,
[1] http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/schedlat.html#downloads
--
------ Ruben ------------------------------------
GnuPG key @ http://www.aliero.org/ruben/ruben.gpg
-------------------------------------------------
Hi everybody,
I have a bass I'd like to plug in my Debian box. I know lots of people
do it routinely with guitar, but I'm worried about the possible side
effects on my hardware. I know that using a bass on a guitar amp would
blow the thing off, but I don't know if it's just the guitar amp speaker
which is not suited for such frequencies or if it's the electronic which
suffer.
>From what I understand, the "line in" soundcard input shouldn't have any
problem dealing with the bass input, but problems might arise with the
output (ATM this would be my stereo). I don't know enough about sound
processing to be sure my assumptions are right.
Anybody has any idea/knowledge to share ?
thanks in advance.
>
>
>>My understanding is that apps need to follow a certain model (call-back
>>base processing vs. block processing, iiuc) in order to function
>>properly within the jack graph to meet it's low-latency and synchornous
>>execution requirements. There were some pre-existing apps that fit this
>>model and some that didn't. The authors of some of those that didn't fit
>>rewrote their apps or wrote new ones. Some other authors either didn't
>>care about jack's goals or disagreed with them and so their apps aren't
>>jackable. I don't think there are any behind the scenes political
>>maneuvers going on to keep certain apps out of the jack family.
>>
>>
Personally, I hate programming with callbacks.
But, the callback thread has to do something really quick with each
block, and return anyway.
It is really easy to write the main processing thread as a 'block
processing' program, which waits on a semaphore or mutex set by the
callback.
->The rest of the IDE stuff shouldn't apply to SATA unless the standards
committees have done a real botched job of things.<-
I have one Seagate Barracuda SATA drive that is seen by the system BIOS
on the primary master IDE channel. I suspect different boards and BIOSs
will handle SATA differently - some will handle it as some kind of SCSI,
and some as some kind of IDE, but I could be wrong. I have used hdparm
on my SATA drive as though it were an IDE, but it didn't change much.
Matt
This is off topic but I figured some people on these two lists MIGHT be
interested in a couple of pieces of gear I'm selling on ebay to make space -
here's the first one:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3737148789
see ya! :)
- Aaron
