PDX7 V2
In 2001, I started learning Pd. The first bigger patch I did was a six
operator FM synthesizer loosely modelled after the famous DX7, which I
called PDX7. Now it's five years later and not only in retrospect
this first patch is quite a mess. But I still like the sounds it
generates. In the meantime I learned a lot more about Pd and about a
lot of other things. So I thought, why not celebrate the fifth
anniversary of me doing Pd, the fifth "birthday" with a cleaner
version of the PDX7, that maybe others can understand to use as well.
The result is the PDX7 V2.
Read and hear more at: http://footils.org/cms/show/51
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
Hi
I have just bought an Edirol UA25 (in the mail at the moment) and is
wondering whether or not to by a USB harddisk. Will this work or will
they disturb each other somehow?
Best regards
Ketil Thorgersen
Being from LA, I find the argument almost comical, the actual sound
produced means nothing, no its all about the look! Like its a software
fashion show.
But anyways terminatorX has a cool looking GUI and runs even under my
crummy system.
Hydrogen looks great, but terminatorX will run on systems too slow for
hydrogen. You can use jack, or not and go right to alsa if you're
having performance issues with jack.
http://terminatorx.org/
>From: Thorsten Wilms <t_w_(a)freenet.de>
>
>_Many_ things suck if put next to Yello.
>Now this could be interpreted like you think that CD sucks
>because it lacks in sound quality. Now is that what you mean?
>Try being specific, damnit.
Most probably it is all: the sounds, the vocals, the effects,
weaknesses in the composition.
I re-checked the startabcontest material: 19 instrumental effects,
17 loops, 11 percussion loops, 4 choir loops, and vocals, each with
multiple versions. Yet it is only one song.
The stereo image of the samples is wide. That makes much to the
quality.
>Maybe the Yello guys do not have "only" skills and many years
>of experience, but also the best equipment? I don't see
>online collaborations helping on, of all aspects, "sound
>quality". Exchanging 32 bit float wavs over the net?
The precision of the files has nothing to do with this kind
of quality.
We need also collaborate with people who knows how to add
the quality. They could come up with plugin arrangements
and presets for variety of tasks. My own plan to was to write
an effect specially designed for vocals, another for drums,
but I would need an impulse sample of known good vocal reverb
and description of possible other effects in the vocal preset.
Anyone?
I feel we can do well without having the best equipment if
we know how to process everything up to today's standards.
Juhana
--
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-graphics-dev
for developers of open source graphics software
"Leonard \"paniq\" Ritter":
> good lord. zynaddsubfx looks vomitorial. just to make this clear: this
> seminar is being held in front of about 100 windows-crazed
> demosceners. :)
Hey, don't be so shallow. Besides, the gui is not that bad. Anyway, just
play this example of synthesized sound:
http://zynaddsubfx.sourceforge.net/doc/PADsynth/demos/0km.ogg
and they will be convinced its a superb program.
And many of them have probably tried zynaddsubfx already since its
available for windows as well.
Are you doing this? It would be great that we guessed some way to
share .wav, .flac, .sf2 files, whatever, CC licensed or such, using
our P2P clients.
I am sure that audio files created by me will not sound like audio
files created by any other, and that any composition using them will
sound unique.
As an example, zipping or rarring then and later changing extension of
the file to .lau would make simple to locate them via a search on a
P2P server.
Just an idea. Comments?
Cordially, Ismael
--
m�, myself et moi http://lamediahostia.blogspot.com/http://www.flickr.com/photos/ivalladt/
Hello,
Firstly i would just like to say how useful this list is, i have been
subscribed for a few months now, but never put any input in.
Now to my problem/issue:
In my studio i have 2 pc's running ubuntu, 1 upstairs in the recording
bit, and 1 downstairs used for the actual recording.
The 2 Pc's are connected via LAN and i can ssh into them. What i want
is to be able to play back things from the downstairs pc through the
upstairs ones speakers.
I could just run up some more cables but that seems excessive.
A quick google made me have a look at netjack, though i cant seem to
install it. Have untared the file and done a sudo scon
-path-to-jack='/home/jack-source/'
But this just sits there doing nothing
Any advice/ideas for my situation?
Cheers
Chris
netjack-0.10 comes with a huge quality improvement to alsa_in and
alsa_out.
its now ready for prime time.
try alsa_out -f 10000 and listen...
--
torben Hohn
http://galan.sourceforge.net -- The graphical Audio language
