Linux-audio-user September 2008

linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

124 participants
125 discussions

by Dave Phillips

Greetings, Is it possible to create a fake mixer in .asoundrc in order to fool Java into thinking my Delta 66 has an on-board mixer ? An example would be most helpful. :) Best, dp

17 years

Re: [LAU] Linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 19, Issue 9

by na bob

Hello, i'm using Linux more than a year and formatted Windows completely, convinced that all could be realized with the software Linux offers. But today i miss an effect that almost makes me return to Windows. The thing i really need and miss is a ladspa plugin, an exciter. Didn't find a Linux version of that. Is there a way to get somebody excited to write an Exciter? Where can i ask? Menno http://www.jamendo.com/de/album/6789/ http://www.jamendo.com/en/album/7428/

17 years

[ANN] jack_capture V0.9.30 and Rollendurcmesserzeitsammler V0.0.7

by Kjetil S. Matheussen

Download from http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/src/?M=D jack_capture ============ jack_capture is a program for recording soundfiles with jack. Its default operation is to capture whatever sound is going out to your speakers into a file. (But it can do a number of other operations as well...) Note: This version includes Hermann Meyer's jack_capture_gui2 program. "jack_capture_gui2" is a nice graphical frontend for for jack_capture with lots of options. Many thanks to Herman for the contribution. Changes 0.9.23 -> 0.9.30: *Added Hermann Meyer's jack_capture_gui2 program. jack_capture_gui2 is a nice graphical frontend for for jack_capture with lots of options. Many thanks to Herman for the contribution. *Don't exit in case port is not found. *Print runtime warning and error messages on top of the console to avoid printing the console meter yet another time. (it's much prettier also) *Fixed a bug that could cause (and especially after the switch from calloc to my_calloc apparantely) segfault when specifying --port more than once. Thanks to Peder Hedlund for spotting the bug. *Print error instead of segfaulting when a specified jack port does not exist. *Removed -g option and changed -O0 to -O2. (Oops, don't know how long that's been there) *Make sure the stop semaphore is initialized before it might be called. *Changed the --recording-time / -d option to record exactly the correct number of frames. (The format for the option is still in seconds though). This fixes the problem where the wall clock and the soundcard clock drifts apart. *Always increase the buffer size with 2 seconds when more than than half the buffer is used, unless maximum buffer size is reached. *Added the --maxbufsize / -MB option which sets maximum buffer size. Default value is 40 seconds. *Decreased the default buffer size from 20 to 10 seconds. *Changed internal data representation from lockless ringbuffer to lockless lifo and fifo stacks. Unmodified lifo/fifo code taken from midishare. (Copyright Grame 1999-2005) Rollendurchmesserzeitsammler v0.0.7 ------------------------------------ The Audio Rollendurchmesserzeitsammler is a conservative garbage collector especially made for running inside an audio DSP thread. 0.0.5 -> 0.0.7 * Cleaned up source a bit. * Fixed a bug in "tar_entering_audio_thread" which caused it to return false if currently copying a different heap. * Cleaned up the critical section handling between the DSP thread and the sweep thread. (it was really messy)

17 years

Re: [LAU] Linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 19, Issue 9

by Bengt Gördén

Den Wednesday 10 September 2008 13.01.58 skrev Martin Horn: > Hi, > > You can even build it up yourself from single EQ and compressor plugins. I've seen quite a few questions regarding exciter-plugin this morning when I googled for it. I think that a short recipe how to do this with ordinary plugins would be appreciated and hopefully posted some where on the www.linuxaudio.org. Maby on quicktoots.linuxaudio.org. > > Greetz > Martin > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Gordon J. C. Pearce <gordonjcp(a)gjcp.net>wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 09:57 -0700, na bob wrote: > > > Is there a way to get somebody excited to write an Exciter? Where can i > > > > ask? > > > > You could ask here, or in linux-audio-developers. The best way to get > > someone excited enough to write one is to offer them cash. > > > > Gordon > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user -- - Bengan ------------------------------------- - Home: 0550-80064, Mobile: +46 70 6443325 ---

17 years

midi channels....

by Grammostola Rosea

Hi, When I load an soundfont with all different sounds in it, i don't have problems with sound... But how should my setup be when I want to play with rosegarden or qtractor and qsynth with an soundfont with one instrument? Thanks in advance,

17 years

Re: [LAU] electric guitar sound

by Grammostola Rosea

Tiago Tavares wrote: > The FreeSoundSamples website has a lot of those. > I found a clean jazzguitar here: http://www.thejazzpage.de/index1.html The distortion one is not that good....

17 years

Which app to use for .gsm-files?

by Julien Claassen

Hello! Does anyone know some app (if possible simple), DEFINTELY TEXT-BASED to playback .gsm files. Or if not, something to convert .gsm to .wav or the like. Kindest regards Julien -------- Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles) ======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ======== http://ltsb.sourceforge.net the Linux TextBased Studio guide ======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: ======= http://www.juliencoder.de

17 years

exciter

by na bob

http://home.hccnet.nl/mag.knevel/ http://www.jamendo.com/de/album/6789/ http://www.jamendo.com/en/album/7428/ --- On Mon, 9/8/08, linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org <linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org> wrote: > From: linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org <linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org> > Subject: Linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 19, Issue 9 > To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Date: Monday, September 8, 2008, 6:00 PM > Send Linux-audio-user mailing list submissions to > linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > or, via email, send a message with subject or body > 'help' to > linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > linux-audio-user-owner(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more > specific > than "Re: Contents of Linux-audio-user digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (Bob van der > Poel) > 2. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (Grammostola > Rosea) > 3. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (Grammostola > Rosea) > 4. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (svoufff at free) > 5. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (Stephen Doonan) > 6. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (David Baron) > 7. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (Bob van der > Poel) > 8. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (Bob van der > Poel) > 9. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (Philippe > Hezaine) > 10. Re: Notation: The State of the Mess (Atte Andr? > Jensen) > 11. Re: Drum samples (Grammostola Rosea) > 12. Re: Drum samples (Edgar Aichinger) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:17:30 -0700 > From: Bob van der Poel <bob(a)mellowood.ca> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > To: Atte Andr? Jensen <atte.jensen(a)gmail.com> > Cc: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Message-ID: <48C40CAA.7010305(a)mellowood.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; > format=flowed > > > > Atte Andr? Jensen wrote: > > Bob van der Poel wrote: > > <snip> > >> ...when I have serious (or fun) work to do I write > my score with MUP. > > > > Could you elaborate abit about why you choose mup over > lilypond? > > > > I'll probably get flamed by the lilypond guys ... but: > > I did spend some time with a number of products in 2004 and > wrote this > review: > > http://mellowood.ca/mup/mup-review.html > > I know things have changed since then. But, I figure that > so long as > something works I'll continue to use it :) > > Biggest concerns for me: > > - I find the syntax of mup much easier. I am quick to > point out that > this might just be a case of "what one knows". > MUP is certainly less > verbose. > > - mup handles transposition very well. I'm not sure > if lily does now > (it didn't last time I checked). > > It is quite possible that the final output from a lily > score may be > better. But to my eyes the stuff I get from mup is very > good. > > These days I don't do band scores anymore with multiple > parts, etc. > Mostly I do lead sheets which I need to print in various > keys (for Bb, > Eb, etc). I've got an automated tool chain for this and > can crank out a > custom score from a fakebook with lyrics, melody and chord > names in 20 > to 40 minutes. > > My biggest sadness with mup is that the authors have NOT > decided to open > source the product. Certainly, that is their right and > I'll not argue > that they must or should. They do regular updates and > respond to user > requests and questions. But, one has to wonder if the > product would > develop more quickly if more folk were able to hack at it. > > Hope this helps. > > -- > **** Listen to my CD at > http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars **** > Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA ** > EMAIL: bob(a)mellowood.ca > WWW: http://www.mellowood.ca > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:58:52 +0200 > From: Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > Cc: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Message-ID: <48C4246C.4020701(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; > format=flowed > > Bob van der Poel wrote: > > Atte Andr? Jensen wrote: > > > >> Bob van der Poel wrote: > >> <snip> > >> > >>> ...when I have serious (or fun) work to do I > write my score with MUP. > >>> > >> Could you elaborate abit about why you choose mup > over lilypond? > >> > >> > > > > I'll probably get flamed by the lilypond guys ... > but: > > > > I did spend some time with a number of products in > 2004 and wrote this > > review: > > > > http://mellowood.ca/mup/mup-review.html > > > > I know things have changed since then. But, I figure > that so long as > > something works I'll continue to use it :) > > > > Biggest concerns for me: > > > > - I find the syntax of mup much easier. I am quick > to point out that > > this might just be a case of "what one > knows". MUP is certainly less > > verbose. > > > > - mup handles transposition very well. I'm not > sure if lily does now > > (it didn't last time I checked). > > > > It is quite possible that the final output from a lily > score may be > > better. But to my eyes the stuff I get from mup is > very good. > > > > These days I don't do band scores anymore with > multiple parts, etc. > > Mostly I do lead sheets which I need to print in > various keys (for Bb, > > Eb, etc). I've got an automated tool chain for > this and can crank out a > > custom score from a fakebook with lyrics, melody and > chord names in 20 > > to 40 minutes. > > > > My biggest sadness with mup is that the authors have > NOT decided to open > > source the product. Certainly, that is their right and > I'll not argue > > that they must or should. They do regular updates and > respond to user > > requests and questions. But, one has to wonder if the > product would > > develop more quickly if more folk were able to hack at > it. > > > > > I did know the existence of MUP, but I did not consider to > use it.... > The notation apps on linux seems to be more orientated > towards Lilypond > (even for tablature: tuxguitar). So my choice was not > difficult and at > the end (with all the notation apps (gui's) on linux in > mind) I think > Lilypond will be the easiest solution... > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:28:56 +0200 > From: Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Message-ID: <48C42B78.8080804(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; > format=flowed > > Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > Bob van der Poel wrote: > > > >> Atte Andr? Jensen wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Bob van der Poel wrote: > >>> <snip> > >>> > >>> > >>>> ...when I have serious (or fun) work to do > I write my score with MUP. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Could you elaborate abit about why you choose > mup over lilypond? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> I'll probably get flamed by the lilypond guys > ... but: > >> > >> I did spend some time with a number of products in > 2004 and wrote this > >> review: > >> > >> http://mellowood.ca/mup/mup-review.html > >> > >> I know things have changed since then. But, I > figure that so long as > >> something works I'll continue to use it :) > >> > >> Biggest concerns for me: > >> > >> - I find the syntax of mup much easier. I am > quick to point out that > >> this might just be a case of "what one > knows". MUP is certainly less > >> verbose. > >> > >> - mup handles transposition very well. I'm > not sure if lily does now > >> (it didn't last time I checked). > >> > >> It is quite possible that the final output from a > lily score may be > >> better. But to my eyes the stuff I get from mup is > very good. > >> > >> These days I don't do band scores anymore with > multiple parts, etc. > >> Mostly I do lead sheets which I need to print in > various keys (for Bb, > >> Eb, etc). I've got an automated tool chain for > this and can crank out a > >> custom score from a fakebook with lyrics, melody > and chord names in 20 > >> to 40 minutes. > >> > >> My biggest sadness with mup is that the authors > have NOT decided to open > >> source the product. Certainly, that is their right > and I'll not argue > >> that they must or should. They do regular updates > and respond to user > >> requests and questions. But, one has to wonder if > the product would > >> develop more quickly if more folk were able to > hack at it. > >> > >> > >> > > I did know the existence of MUP, but I did not > consider to use it.... > > The notation apps on linux seems to be more orientated > towards Lilypond > > (even for tablature: tuxguitar). So my choice was not > difficult and at > > the end (with all the notation apps (gui's) on > linux in mind) I think > > Lilypond will be the easiest solution... > > > > > > > Edit: another reason to learn lilypond is the fact that it > is able to > handle notation, drum notation and tablature. I think there > is no > notation editor on linux (with gui) which can do that. So > my advice, > learn lilypond with the help of lilypondtool and lilykde > and when you > can do with it what you want to do, consider to use one of > the available > gui's for it... or not... > If you first work all the time with one of the gui's, > it will be hard to > edit something fast you wasn't able to do with you gui > without some > basic knowledge of lilypond in my opinion... > > So stay 'sick' home for a week and make sure you > are able to work with > lilypond at the end of that week , and I promise you, you > will feel much > better ;) > > For the dutch people, I found a nice tutorial/ handleiding > by the maker > of lilykde: > http://www.wilbertberendsen.nl/cursus_lilypond > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:55:33 +0400 > From: svoufff at free <svoufff(a)free.fr> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > To: Atte Andr? Jensen > <atte.jensen(a)gmail.com>, linux-audio-user > <linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org> > Message-ID: <1220817333.23594.75.camel@ours> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Yes i work on Sibelius almost everyday along linuxsampler > to hear my > scores. > I'm on Ubuntu Hardy with RT kernel 2.6.24-19-rt. > Sibelius 4.1.5 > Wine 1.0 > LS 5.1 > I installed Sibelius as usual then i trhrown the file > gdiplus.dll in > ~/.wine/drive_c/windows/system32 > I also put in that folder the files mfc42.dll, msvcirt.dll > and > msvcp60.dll but don't recall if that was really for > sibelius or another > win-app > I installed the msttcorefonts package > On wine config, audio section, i had to choose only alsa > driver. > > Then this is time to start everything : > -start jack > -start LS and load some sounds, connect LS in jack if > it's not done > automatically > -start Sibelius.Go to Play/Playback & Input Devices.In > front of the > device you wanna use you have a yes/no (the "use" > column).Single-click > or double -click or triple-click...til you have a > "yes".You won't have > to do it again if you start the device (LS in my case) > before Sibelius. > > Everything should be ready.Here's a webpage at winehq > that helped me : > http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=8340 > > 98% is working, it's a great app. > Otherwise, > sometimes its's slow and consumes much CPU (graphic > refresh problem > probably). > Texts objects are tricky to point at.That's THE > annoying thing. > Texts of more than one line are not displayed properly.That > unfortunately include time signatures.If you work on 4/4 > you can choose > C instead but for other metrics you have to hide it then > write a the > numbers with normal text style. > > Well that's all i think.Hope you can get it running. > > > Le dimanche 07 septembre 2008 ? 14:11 +0200, Atte Andr? > Jensen a ?crit : > > David Baron wrote: > > > Very little has progressed since the last thread > here. > > > > A sidestep: > > > > Has anyone been able to run sibelius under linux? If > so, what steps did > > you have to follow? > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:05:51 -0600 > From: Stephen Doonan <stephen.doonan(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > Cc: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Message-ID: <48C4341F.2020302(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; > format=flowed > > Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > > Edit: another reason to learn lilypond is the fact > that it is able to > > handle notation, drum notation and tablature. I think > there is no > > notation editor on linux (with gui) which can do that. > > > I love LilyPond and notated several piano pieces with it. > It is very > logical, very full-featured, and does produce beautiful > scores. > > However, I stopped trying to notate with LilyPond because > of the absence > of one single feature-- > > In piano music and music for other polyphonic instruments, > it is common, > in order to create a score that is less cluttered and easy > to read, to > split a polyphonic voice (a voice that can contain chords > instead of a > single note) into two or more voices, and to combine two or > more voices > into a single voice. Sometimes this addition or subtraction > of voices is > sudden and may last only a very brief time--perhaps not > even a full measure. > > The problem with this and LilyPond has to do with ties > (tied notes). > When I used LilyPond (a couple years ago) it was very > difficult and > required rather complex coding to make even a single tie > extend from one > voice to another. When the complexity of voices that merge > and split at > arbitrary times was added, it was virtually impossible to > write LilyPond > code that would add the necessary ties between the > identical notes in > other voices. > > This one thing has been disappointing enough to me during > these last > couple years to keep me away from LilyPond, although I have > checked its > development from time to time. I volunteered to help > sponsor (fund the > programming of) this feature several times, but neither > other users nor > the lead developer, Han-Wen Nienhuys, responded to that > suggestion, > although Han-Wen had incorporated some rather complex code > regarding > ties that I had volunteered to sponsor some months earlier. > > I think that LilyPond is an extraordinary, great program > and that > Han-Wen is a brilliant programmer. However, if one's > interest is in > notating polyphonic music, this issue becomes an obstacle > that is > impossible to ignore and hard to work around. > > However, all that said, I would be thrilled to be proven > wrong. :-) > > Steve > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:19:22 +0300 > From: David Baron <d_baron(a)012.net.il> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Message-ID: <200809072319.23766.d_baron(a)012.net.il> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 > > On Sunday 07 September 2008 20:17:30 Bob van der Poel > wrote: > > ClamAV 0.94 > > > > Atte Andr? Jensen wrote: > > > Bob van der Poel wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > > >> ...when I have serious (or fun) work to do I > write my score with MUP. > > > > > > Could you elaborate abit about why you choose mup > over lilypond? > > > > I'll probably get flamed by the lilypond guys ... > but: > > > > I did spend some time with a number of products in > 2004 and wrote this > > review: > > > > http://mellowood.ca/mup/mup-review.html > > > > I know things have changed since then. But, I figure > that so long as > > something works I'll continue to use it :) > > > > Biggest concerns for me: > > > > - I find the syntax of mup much easier. I am quick > to point out that > > this might just be a case of "what one > knows". MUP is certainly less > > verbose. > > > > - mup handles transposition very well. I'm not > sure if lily does now > > (it didn't last time I checked). > > > Mup does not look bad at all, aside from not being > opensource. But it > certainly will not break the bank and does produce nice > output if it gets > decent input. You, computers ... > > A while back, someone was working a a minimalist scoring > program, gcomposer I > think he called it. His syntax was very close to MUPs idea. > He was not > interested in a full repertoire of music symbols, however. > But a GUI for MUP > in the making. it certainly could be. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:36:01 -0700 > From: Bob van der Poel <bob(a)mellowood.ca> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > To: Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> > Cc: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Message-ID: <48C47371.4030006(a)mellowood.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; > format=flowed > > > > Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > > > Edit: another reason to learn lilypond is the fact > that it is able to > > handle notation, drum notation and tablature. I think > there is no > > MUP does these as well :) But, really, use what works for > you! Important > part is the music, not the process. > > -- > **** Listen to my CD at > http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars **** > Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA ** > EMAIL: bob(a)mellowood.ca > WWW: http://www.mellowood.ca > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:42:53 -0700 > From: Bob van der Poel <bob(a)mellowood.ca> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > To: David Baron <d_baron(a)012.net.il> > Cc: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Message-ID: <48C4750D.7070700(a)mellowood.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; > format=flowed > > > > David Baron wrote: > > > > A while back, someone was working a a minimalist > scoring program, gcomposer I > > think he called it. His syntax was very close to MUPs > idea. He was not > > The original noteedit program used a mup-lilke syntax. I > even managed to > import/export a few simple pieces (just playing around > stuff). The new > program nted uses a text file which appears to represent > the gui display > much more than the music (which probably makes lots of > sense). BTW, nted > is a program which I've give a go and it appears to > have lots of promise. > > > interested in a full repertoire of music symbols, > however. But a GUI for MUP > > in the making. it certainly could be. > > Do you folks really think a gui is important for this kind > of stuff? I > know that I am very happy doing mup (and mma) stuff with a > text editor. > I have used a number of GUI interfaces for music and find > they just slow > me down or get in my way. With a program like mup (or lily) > one can have > an editor in a window and do repetitive compiles/displays > in a separate > window (or in emacs, in the same). And with fast CPUs which > are so > common today it is very fast to do. Maybe I'm just > showing my age :) > > -- > **** Listen to my CD at > http://www.mellowood.ca/music/cedars **** > Bob van der Poel ** Wynndel, British Columbia, CANADA ** > EMAIL: bob(a)mellowood.ca > WWW: http://www.mellowood.ca > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:57:48 +0200 > From: Philippe Hezaine <philippe.hezaine(a)free.fr> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Message-ID: <48C4CCEC.4010304(a)free.fr> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Bob van der Poel a ?crit : > > > > > > > - mup handles transposition very well. I'm not > sure if lily does now > > (it didn't last time I checked). > > > > Hi, > > see the manual: > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Transpose.html > > Hope this helps. > -- > Phil. > Superbonus-Project (Site principal) > <http://superbonus.project.free.fr> > > Superbonus-Project (Plate-forme d'?change): > <http://philippe.hezaine.free.fr> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:44:26 +0200 > From: Atte Andr? Jensen <atte.jensen(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Notation: The State of the Mess > To: svoufff at free <svoufff(a)free.fr> > Cc: linux-audio-user > <linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org> > Message-ID: <48C4E5EA.5030206(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > svoufff at free wrote: > > > Well that's all i think.Hope you can get it > running. > > Thanks for the fantastic info! I'm not yet a sibelius > user, but need to > jump in order to work with other teachers at the school > where I'm teaching. > > Your report tells me it's possible, I'll give it a > go asap, and get back > in case of trouble. > > BTW: I installed vmware, which might be the backup > solution... > > Thanks again! > > -- > Atte > > http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:11:22 +0200 > From: Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Drum samples > To: Dave Phillips <dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com> > Cc: linux-audio-user > <linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org> > Message-ID: <48C5247A.3040101(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Dave Phillips wrote: > > Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > > >> I tried to make an gig of the G&S Custom Work > Drum Kit Sample Library, > >> but the Cymbals have a very weak sound (not loud). > Is it possible to > >> make it better with gigedit? > >> > >> > >> > > Use a soundfile editor (Audacity, Snd, ReZound, etc) > to adjust relative > > volume. Normalize or add gain, save it as a WAV, then > load it into Gigedit > > > > > > > Thanks. What does normalize? > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:10:54 +0200 > From: Edgar Aichinger <edogawa(a)aon.at> > Subject: Re: [LAU] Drum samples > To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > Message-ID: <200809081610.54848.edogawa(a)aon.at> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Am Montag 08 September 2008 schrieb Grammostola Rosea: > > Dave Phillips wrote: > > > Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > > > > >> I tried to make an gig of the G&S Custom > Work Drum Kit Sample Library, > > >> but the Cymbals have a very weak sound (not > loud). Is it possible to > > >> make it better with gigedit? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Use a soundfile editor (Audacity, Snd, ReZound, > etc) to adjust relative > > > volume. Normalize or add gain, save it as a WAV, > then load it into Gigedit > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. What does normalize? > > It looks for the loudest sample value in the file or block, > calculates the > factor between this and the highest possible value > (representing 0dB), and > then multiplies all sample values with this factor. > > If you need it even louder you will have to apply > compression, and normalize > again. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > > End of Linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 19, Issue 9 > ***********************************************

17 years

Converting sfark files

by David Baron

The, I guess are compressed soundfonts. How do I uncompress them?

17 years

electric guitar sound

by Grammostola Rosea

Hi, I'm searching for an electric guitar sound files (gig or soundfont). With and without distortion... Regards,

17 years

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-user September 2008