Linux-audio-user September 2008

linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

124 participants
125 discussions

Fw: Latest -rt kernel with working nvidia

by Norval Watson

Might have spoken too soon re 2.6.26-5-rt9 kernel.. Yesterday "seemed to be OK" Today definitely not OK - - midi connection probs - apps crashing and freezing and then resisting all attempts to "kill" and "killall" Maybe due to this issue Esben Stein pointed out on this list recently http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Removing_the_Big_Kernel_Lock UbuntuStudio has released (maybe unofficially) 2.6.26.1 rt kernel http://www.linux-archive.org/ubuntu-kernel-team/152269-ubuntu-studio-rt-2-6… So again I wonder what is the latest rt kernel that works with audio ie. jack, midi etc and can be compiled with nvidia's driver? Otherwise I go back to 2.6.23, grab old pkgs from somewhere and recompile - but I hate going backwards! Cheers Norv Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail

16 years, 3 months

automatic getting BPM of file

by Atte André Jensen

Hi Is there a piece of software under linux that'll automatically analyze a file and report a (good estimate of the) tempo in BPM? -- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk

16 years, 3 months

USB soundcard for stereo mic 3.5" jack

by Florian Schmidt

Hi, i'm shopping for a soundcard to do rehearsal recordings with my stereo mic (audio technica pro 24).. It has a 3.5" stereo mini plug and has its own battery if power is not supplied by the jack. I guess most USB soundcards would work with the small problem that a line in (which is stereo) has a too small gain (and maybe impedance problems).. So is there a USB device that would work with this mic? Thanks and Regards, Flo -- Palimm Palimm! http://tapas.affenbande.org

16 years, 3 months

Compiling Rubber Band (sorta) revisited

by Darren Landrum

This one has me flummoxed, as it's turned out to be essentially un-googlable: In trying to get Rubber Band compiled on my new Kubuntu load, I ran ./configure with the settings to I found from before to ignore the Vamp stuff: ----- ./configure Vamp_CFLAGS=no Vamp_LIBS=no ----- Configure runs fine, everything checks out, then I run make, and get this error: ----- g++ -DHAVE_FFTW3 -DFFTW_DOUBLE_ONLY -DNO_THREAD_CHECKS -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall no -Irubberband -Isrc -c -o src/ConstantAudioCurve.o src/ConstantAudioCurve.cpp g++: no: No such file or directory make: *** [src/ConstantAudioCurve.o] Error 1 ----- Searching for "g++: no: No such file or directory" turns up absolutely nothing that helped. Maybe someone here can nudge me in the right direction? Thanks! Regards, Darren Landrum

16 years, 3 months

lilypond wiki plugin

by Grammostola Rosea

Hi, we are searching for a plugin for our wiki: http://wiki.linuxmusicians.com/doku.php to be able to share lilypond files. Is there such a plugin for this kind of wiki? Thanks in advance,

16 years, 3 months

Re: [LAU] Latest -rt kernel with working nvidia

by Norval Watson

> I wonder what is the latest -rt kernel that works with the nvidia 3D > drivers? I had 2.6.23.11-rt14 working great with Debian's > auto-install nvidia until a recent update from sid repository. But > now it's broken and I got no 3D :( So if I compile a new -rt kernel > to work with nvidia which one should I get? > > Norval Watson > "Latest nvidia beta (177.70) has support for PREEMPT_RT, means it compiles and works fine without patching. Tested on 2.6.26-rt. Best, Tom" Thanks Tom Kuther... I followed mzilikazi's instructions here: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=17035&postdays=0&postorder=asc&sta… and built 2.6.26.5-rt9 nvidia-ready kernel . Seems to work OK. nvidia-kernel version 173.14.09-5. Norv Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail

16 years, 3 months

Re: [LAU] Linux audio course Rotterdam

by david

drew Roberts wrote: > On Saturday 13 September 2008 23:30:52 david wrote: >> drew Roberts wrote: >>> On Saturday 13 September 2008 01:27:37 david wrote: >>>> drew Roberts wrote: >>>>> On Friday 12 September 2008 15:14:03 Bob van der Poel wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 06:50:42PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: >>>>>>>>> When you give a course it cost you: time, traveling costs >>>>>>>>> (Brussels > R'dam) organization, making a course book (and copy >>>>>>>>> it?) and linux audio usage, educational and presentation skills.... >>>>>>>>> that could deserve some money.... >>>>>>>> I agree. OTOH, one reason why the course is given in >>>>>>>> English in the centre of the Dutch/Flemish language >>>>>>>> region may be that a lot of the course material is >>>>>>>> just copied from material available on the web. >>>>>>>> In that case I just hope that Mr. Moors has all >>>>>>>> the copyright issues sorted out. >>>>>> Really, what is the problem here? >>>>>> >>>>>> If you think the course is too expensive ... don't go. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you can do better ... offer your own course. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you want to teach for free then do so; if you want to get paid, >>>>>> then charge. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you don't want your stuff copied off the web and used in a >>>>>> commercial manner: don't post or affix a "not for commercial use" >>>>>> copyright. BTW, the GNU licence doesn't support this so you'll have to >>>>>> use a different one (correct me if I'm wrong). >>>>>> >>>>>> Isn't the whole point of freedom the ability to do what you want to >>>>>> do? >>>>>> >>>>>> I have donated a lot of software over the years ... and I've sold >>>>>> stuff as well. But, one thing I will not do anymore is to play for >>>>>> free. Too many times I've done just that for some good cause which >>>>>> doesn't have any budget this year ... and then next year, when they do >>>>>> have some money, they hire and pay someone from out-of-town. I'm sure >>>>>> the same applies to teaching. >>>>> We all likely tend to develop our own rules of thumb over the years. I >>>>> try not do do any windows tech support gratis for friends and family >>>>> anymore. I have moved away from windows to avoid those problems and >>>>> paid the price in various ways to do so. I don't see why I should pay >>>>> for them not doing so. >>>>> >>>>>> Please don't confuse freedom and free beer! >>>>> Indeed. Also, look at the speaking fees famous people get. I am sure a >>>>> part of the fee goes to being able to say you rubbed shoulders with >>>>> that famous person as opposed to the content of the speech you heard. >>>>> >>>>> And as someone has already pointed out in another way, if this course >>>>> is successful, everyone now has a model to follow should they wish to >>>>> do so. >>>>> >>>>> Re playing for free for charities and the like. Perhaps do so with a >>>>> bill that comes due should they pay another act in the future? (If you >>>>> value the charity that is.) >>>> No, that probably wouldn't go anywhere. Better to work out a *price* >>>> with the charity (based on how much you might charge normally) - and >>>> make it a donation and documented as such by the charity. Then you get a >>>> tax benefit (at least in the US). >>> Got you. I would have no such tax incentives here though. >> What - you mean you can't deduct charitable contributions wherever you >> live? > > Correct. Probably because we have nothing to deduct it from as we pay no > income tax here in the first place. Lucky guy. >>> However, doing it >>> the way you say would only give you the tax advantage and might still >>> leave you miffed next year when they actually pay out of town talent as >>> in the original example right? Or am I missing something key? >> Well, it would seem to me that if you give them a good, successful >> performance that they like - you've done the best you can to avoid being >> replaced with out-of-town talent next year. I think you'll have also >> laid a good foundation for getting paid next year. I've been to a number >> of charitable/non-profit organization events that had the same band(s) >> from year to year because their members really liked them. >> >> Also - you performed before a good sized group of people. If they liked >> your performance, you've increased the number of mouths available to >> pass on good words about you to others they come in contact with. >> >> Also - I wouldn't be surprised if an organization unwilling to pay the >> piper this year won't be willing to pay the piper next year. So why >> worry if they pick someone else? If you charged them for next year, >> sounds like they might pick someone else who would do the show free, >> anyway. > > Good points. You don't have to convince me though. It was someone else who > made the initial statement we are discussing. I just was trying to get your > answers to match better with the initial conditions. That's part of the fun of multi-tangled emails! Will put this back on the list so whomever original started it can hear it. >>> I can see how your idea could work for a person in a high tax bracket and >>> who charged at the high end of their normal rates who would normally give >>> a reduced rate to the charity. >> I suppose it depends on where you live and how much you make - but worth >> consulting your local tax advisors about, if you're performing for a >> living. > > Personally, I don't have local tax advisors nor do I perform for a living. I > have enjoyed the idea exchange though. Cool. -- David gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com authenticity, honesty, community

16 years, 3 months

Open Source Musician Podcast Episode #3

by Daniel Worth

Episode #3 of the Podcast is now published. Check it out at http://opensourcemusician.libsyn.com/ Thanks, Dan

16 years, 3 months

Customizing Kubuntu for music?

by Darren Landrum

I'd rather run Kubuntu rather then Ubuntu Studio 64 for my system. I was wondering how hard it might be to install Kubuntu 64 then maybe enable the Ubuntu Studio 64 repositories in order to grab their RT kernel and get it working? From there, I would compile the music apps (and some of the libs) that I want myself, so I can stay nice and up to date, a complaint I've brought up in the past. Possible? Would I be biting off more than is worth chewing? * AMD64 X2 6000+ (3.1ghz) * 2GB DDR2-800 RAM * NVidia NForce chipset Thanks! Regards, Darren Landrum

16 years, 3 months

Latest -rt kernel with working nvidia

by Norval Watson

I wonder what is the latest -rt kernel that works with the nvidia 3D drivers? I had 2.6.23.11-rt14 working great with Debian's auto-install nvidia until a recent update from sid repository. But now it's broken and I got no 3D :( So if I compile a new -rt kernel to work with nvidia which one should I get? Norval Watson Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail

16 years, 3 months

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-user September 2008