Onderwerp: Re: Re: [LAU] Linux-audio-user Digest, Vol 122, Issue 25
Datum: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 14:20:21 +0200
Van: Crojav <hendrikus.godvliet(a)posteo.net>
Aan: Hermann Meyer <brummer-(a)web.de>
Op 28-04-17 om 21:11 schreef Hermann Meyer:
> Did a test with the new release:
> * 440Hz sinus tone in Audacity > Gxtuner makes + 5 / 439Hz
> * 432Hz sinus tone in Audacity > Gxtuner makes -2 / 439Hz
Herman
I have to come back on this - sorry I made a mistake this test (above) I made was with the older release!
Now i installed the NEW release. I am impressed you made the GxTuner completely as I asked before it - thanks for that. This is working. The neadle is kalm
as if it in a the oil, the needle react not that nervous anymore.
Beside the BUILD DEPENDENCY’S I had to install:
sudo apt-get install build-essential libgtk-3-dev
I can't work without a good functioning tuner/frequency-meter, beside that Kmeter. That my starting point.
Did you know how Martin the Beatles songs produced, tuner/tuning/tuning all the way long, and he's not the only one.
Regards Crojav
Hey hey,
I recently tried to get PD to work on my Arch system, using the "official"
pacman package (version 0.47.1).
Thanks to Iohannes, I was made aware of the -nogui option, so I ran a patch
like this:
pd -nogui -jack -alsamidi patch.pd
The patch is also from last year. This results in a lot of errors, like these:
prvu~
error: ... couldn't create
verbose(4): ... you might be able to track this down from the Find menu.
sin~
error: ... couldn't create
average~ 1000
error: ... couldn't create
...
and similar. Using the jack option PD also segfaults. Without using that, it
can't find an audio device and just talks to its watchdog.
JACK is also system supplied and works with everything else. It's run under
the same user. Even giving the option to set the samplerate doesn't change
anything.
Any ideas, what I could try? Perhaps some special system variable setting a
path?
Thanks and goodnight,
Jeanette
--------
When you need someone, you just turn around and I will be there <3
Hey hey,
I've decided to unearth a few early works. These two songs are from 2002, the
first ever "album" recorded with Linux. Equipment and the software setup were
laughably simple and awkward, the overall performance lacks the quality and
precision I demand of myself today. But there is a leverty and a carefree
personality in them that I can't reproduce or improve.
http://juliencoder.de/nama/archives/final/07-interlude3.ogghttp://juliencoder.de/nama/archives/final/07-interlude.mp3
and
http://juliencoder.de/nama/archives/final/08-summer_afternoon.ogghttp://juliencoder.de/nama/archives/final/08-summer_afternoon.mp3
If anyone is interested: the synths used were a Roland XP-30 (jv/xp series), a
Clavia Nordlead 3 and on "Summer Afternoon" also a Zoom RT123 drum computer
(sample-based). Recorded in Ecasound and mixed offline using Ecasound internal
effects and some LADSPA plugins.
Feedback is always welcome, eve in this case. :)
Enjoy and best wishes,
Jeanette
--------
When you need someone, you just turn around and I will be there <3
Op 27-04-17 om 14:00 schreef linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org:
> You could start gxtuner like that:
> gxtuner -p 435
>
> or, you could calibrate it on runtime with the little knob on the right
> side on the bottom.
>
> Also, if the interface is to small for your needs, just scratch it to
> the size you prefer or start it like this:
>
> gxtuner -p 435 -w 600 -l 400
O.k you know how it works = great thank! This is the only Tuner I got
working in Ubuntu Studio. What I mean by it was not easy to with the
little knob to get in the exact tuning say 435Hz than the steps it takes
are more like 435.2 e.t.c.
Op 27-04-17 om 14:00 schreef linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org:
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:52:14 +0200
> From: Ralf Mardorf<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
> If you insisted in receiving digest, then log in, at the bottom of
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user "Unsubscribe or
> edit options".
>
> By the 3. option in the grey area, "Get MIME or Plain Text Digests?",
> switch from "Plain Text" to "MIME".
Done it - next it will be visible
Op 27-04-17 om 14:00 schreef linux-audio-user-request(a)lists.linuxaudio.org:
> From: Ralf Mardorf<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
> To:linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
> Subject: Re: [LAU] Frequency counter - Was: Linux-audio-user Digest,
> Vol 122, Issue 24
> Message-ID:<20170426165214.191c9dab(a)archlinux.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Hi Crojav,
>
> I'm short in time, so just a very short reply. You are right, sometimes
> Linux instrument tuners that are good, don't work at all. It might help
> to build your own version, instead of using packages.
Thanks Ralf Most of the time is that what i do when its interesting -
but that is also not a garantie that it works!
Hey everyone!
>From time to time I post my dronings, which are typically beatless ambient
tunes. The vast majority of them are composed with Linux Audio programs.
I just launched a Patreon page for project "droning".
https://www.patreon.com/droning
Now, why would that necessarily be interesting for you?
Apart from early access to releases and lossless FLAC downloads, I will
also be sharing behind-the-scenes material, for both previous dronings and
new ones.
For those of you who would like to join a fellow Linux musician on his
journey to create music and follow my creation process, you are very
welcome to become part of project "droning" community.
I would love to connect with people who enjoy ambient in general and my
approach to ambient in particular. At the same time your support will help
me continue working on the project.
Cheers!
--
Louigi Verona
https://www.patreon.com/droninghttps://louigiverona.com/
Hey hey,
I currently have a PureData patch, but can't use PD, because it's a GUI. So I
need to figure out its workings by reading and interpreting the text. Is there
a manual or other concise reference work to help me in this endeavour? Not
being familiar with PD - and its terminology - at all, simply searching hasn't
yielded any helpful results.
Thanks for any practical hints, in advance.
Best wishes,
Jeanette
--------
When you need someone, you just turn around and I will be there <3
Not strictly Linux-related, but I want to know if anyone has
recommendations for 5.1 speakers for editing 5.1 audio. Most 5.1 speaker
sets are aimed either at PC gaming or home theatre applications.
I'm a classical music recording engineer and I do all my recording work
in the field with a laptop and a firewire mixer/interface - a mixture of
stereo and ambient 5.1 with a Williams Star microphone array. I then
copy the recordings onto my editing PC at home which currently has a
regular amp and stereo speakers. I edit 5.1 recordings "by inspection",
editing each channel in turn and just hoping the final product sounds
OK. I don't hear the finished product until I burn a DVD-Audio disc and
play it back on my Blu-Ray home theatre system.
I don't think I would want to use a 5.1 speaker set for my stereo
editing work so I would want to switch from the stereo amp+speakers to
the 5.1 set. Probably means having two sound cards.
I am on a tight budget so I'm wondering if I can get away with a cheap
5.1 set just to check the levels between each channel, but still use my
decent stereo speakers for all the other editing. Thoughts?
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Gazeley
Senior Systems Administrator
IT Services
University of Bristol
