Is anyone in contact with S.Massey these days? I want to discuss something with
him but don't have an email address :(
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
It seems I was unsubscribed by someone today. I received this message:
> linux-audio-user-bounces(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
> 6:00 PM (2 hours ago)
> to me
> Goodbye. We hope you enjoyed the linux-audio-user list.
I had not done anything to my membership, and I had no desire to be
unsubscribed. Does anyone have any idea why this might have happened?
Best,
Renick
--
Renick Bell
- http://renickbell.net
- http://twitter.com/renick
- http://the3rd2nd.com
Hi Guys, since i also use Ubuntu i'm on the Ubuntu dev list. Here's
someone ( Castle OfWhite/Chateau DuBlanc ) first complaining about
systemD. He even "wrote" a "song" about that called Jumble of Lines and
published it on youtube (youtu.be/ACDi1YOcupk). The best part: He uses
the GPL to license the SONG!! Prompted by others that the GPL is
inadequate for non-software, that is, art material, this is his reply.
Needless to mention, he was banned from the list.
Disclaimer:
The following does not represent my views/ is not my words and the
"SONG" is CERTAINLY NOT MINE. I'm forwarding it to you for your
entertainment from the ubuntu mailing list.
Regards Gerald
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is.
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:13:54 +0100
From: Castle OfWhite <castleofwhite(a)mail.com>
To: John Moser <john.r.moser(a)gmail.com>
CC: ubuntu-devel-discuss(a)lists.ubuntu.com
Nope. Fuck you.
It was good enough for us then and it's good enough for us now.
You can use this media with any GPL program or other GPL media.
Go and fuck yourself.
(and hey, it's dual licensed under CC BY SA anyway if you're a
homosexual who is anal)
The Law is all about appeals to authority, dumbass.
It's my fucking song and I can distribute it as I like, and I say the
GPL is the license.
You can certainly use it and modify it and do anything you could do with
a GPL program.
YOU cannot tell ME what I decide for MY FUCKING SONGS YOU PIECE OF SHIT.
FUCK YOU YOU DAMNED PRO FEMINIST FUCK.
And Fuck SystemD.
My Copyright protected work, MY LICENSING DECISION.
And I have decided GPL. It has always worked and is proven.
And if you continue to keep saying I have licensed it less permissably.
Well then that's libel and I hope to see you in an alleyway, because
you're spreading lies about me.
Shut your fucking mouth.
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 at 6:07 PM
From: "John Moser" <john.r.moser(a)gmail.com>
To: "Castle OfWhite" <castleofwhite(a)mail.com>,
ubuntu-devel-discuss(a)lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is.
On 11/05/2014 01:01 PM, Castle OfWhite wrote:
> It's licensed elsewhere under CC-BY-SA aswell, just for such an occasion.
> The GPL is a fine media license when said media is a part of a program
> (game etc). In such cases Judges usually see the entire thing as a whole
> rather than a collection of parts.
>
That's a weak argument. It's an appeal to authority and to tradition.
The GPL directly describes considerations for linking and source code,
as well as program executable modules. While it makes some sense to
include resources in the definition of the program in general,
extracting the media from the program immediately creates confusion
about what exactly was violated; the only proper interpretation is that
distributing the media with the program is allowed, while the media
without being part of the program is not under any permissive license
and, thus, distributing it is a copyright violation.
> I do know what I'm doing, and You show your ignorance :).
> I've been writing programs and making free/opensource media
> from before the CC license were created.
>
> Back then we just licensed our stuff under the GPL, the BSD license, or
> the gnu FDL. (or all of them) Worked fine. People understood.
>
> SO FUCK YOU!
>
> Go fuck yourself you pro-feminist pro-systemd piece of shit.
> (I remeber when there weren't feminists in free/opensource too)
> (nor better-than-thou systemd loving assholes)
>
> I hope Mr Cook is edged out because he supports your beliefs
> (and that is leading to a ban in russia of apple products)
> You people need to be fought back against. You've ruined the
> world for regular men.
>
Okay, civilized conversation has broken down.
>> On 11/05/2014 12:27 PM, Chateau DuBlanc wrote:
>>> A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is.
>>> "More code .: better"
>>>
>>> youtu.be/ACDi1YOcupk
>>>
>>> SystemD introduces (further) systemic vulnerabilities into Gnu/Linux.
>>> Here is a song feeling that situation out.
>>>
>>
>> Take this immaturity elsewhere. I thought I was being spammed by
>> YouTube again.
>>
>>> (C) Gnu GPL v2
>>>
>>
>> GPL is not an appropriate media license; it is a license for source
>> code. This usage shows you like to make statements about things you
>> don't understand; thus your assessments of systemd are immediately
>> suspect, and readily assumed misguided.
>>
>> In other words: you obviously don't know what you're talking about, and
>> your input on any matter is valueless.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss(a)lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Hey everyone!
I am now successfully using Simple Screen Recorder to record screencasts.
It is a very stable program with impressive options and end results.
The only thing that I am trying to figure out - is how to record both the
desktop and microphone. I see "let's play" videos all over YouTube and
people on Windows don't seem to have any problem with this.
Is it doable on Linux?
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
hi all
I have a Hoontech sta audio 24 audio card with external ADC-DAC2000
8in-8out (unbalanced) box.
I have not used this one in a few years (~2-3) but now that I reconnected
it, I realise that IN channels 5&6 I get no sound..
the VUmeteres in mudita24 and envy24 mixers do not register any sound.
it strikes me as odd if both channels decided to die together. Is it
possible that something is muted or disabled and I do not find its control
inside mudita24 mixer?
note that all other (analog) 6 inputs and 8 outputs work like a charm.
thank you for your help!
hi all,
I recently bought an arturia beatstep that I'm planningto use for audio
routing control and music composition in linux.
I am currently monitoring "all midi stuff" that come out of this little
midi controller , using "qmidiroute" to see the event log.
I see that all commands that are sent from Arturia's beatstep are on midi
channel 1.
I tried changing that from beatstep surface, (holding down "CHAN" button
and selecting a channel from the 16 pads) but the event log still registers
midi information on channel 1.
am I doing something the wrong way?
or does beatstep only step signal on midi channel 1 Only?
thank you in advance for you help!
hello there,
is there an application that I am missing that allows programming execution
of arbitrary bash scripts (or others) following pressing specific midi
notes?
googling about it did not provide any results..
Thank you for your help