Linux-audio-user

linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

20684 discussions

by Kjetil Matheussen

> Hello all, > > Since four days now, the melody I try to reproduce below is > haunting my brain. Don't know how i picked it up. > > It's a popular classical piece which I have heard many times, > from the romantic period and as I remember it, for string > orchestra. > > But I can't find out what it is. Tried some of the 'find a > melody' sites, no succes. > > 6/8 (or maybe 3/4) > - = continuation of previous note by 1/8 > > | A-- G#-- | A---- B | C-- B-- | Bb----- | > | Bb-- A-- | G----- | F-- G Bb A | Bb----- | > > Can anyone identify this ?? > Doesn't ring a bell here, figuratively speaking. But maybe you can find it via http://www.themefinder.org/ ? I couldn't find it with themefinder though, but I'm not sure if I used it correctly.

2 years, 8 months

Re: help!

by bil＠ccrma.Stanford.EDU

It's not an exact match, but that reminds me of Schumann's "du Ring an Meinem Finger".

2 years, 8 months

Re: Elementary help needed with qTractor

by David Sumbler

Thank you both for your suggestions. Having experimented further, I find that, as I expected, the earpieces are completely inaudible when they are not in my ear (they are just the little ear-bud type of thing). The default connections shown bu aJackCtl are: System(capture) to qTractor and PulseAudio JACK Source qTractor and PulseAudio JACK Sink to System(playback) This seems about right, to me, I experimented with removing the connections to/from PulseAudio, but this doesn't make any difference to the problem I have been getting. I also experimented with muting various things in Pavu, without any success. So either I am doing something very basic completely wrongly (quite likely!), or perhaps there is some sort of crossover going on in my sound card between input and output. I did attempt to repeat my experimental recording on my desktop computer, but couldn't figure out how to get the input from my webcam's microphone into qTractor. When I start Jack, the System(capture) node doesn't appear in the connections graph at all. David

2 years, 8 months

Elementary help needed with qTractor

by David Sumbler

Several years ago I managed to produce some multi-track midi files using qTractor. Now I want to do something fairly simple using audio tracks. Just to get myself back into using qTractor after a very long break, and to find out how to do what I want, I decided to try something very simple to start with. I want to record a guide track using my voice, and then record 3 other voice tracks (separately), listening to the guide track through an earpiece. Then I shall delete the guide track and experiment with altering the pan settings on two of the other 3 tracks to see if I can get a good stereo effect. I'm using an HP laptop and its internal microphone, with an earpiece plugged into the computer's headphone socket; no sound comes from the computer's speakers, of course. Recording the guide track is no problem. To record the second track, I set it up as an unmonitored audio track and set the guide track to solo. I then record the new track whilst listening to the guide track through the earpiece. But after recording the second track, even if I delete the guide track, I can still faintly hear what was on the guide track - in other words, the new track has recorded the contents of the guide track at the same time as the new input from the microphone. I have tried this several times, and I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong - probably because I'm a musician and not a sound engineer. If anyone has the patience to try to steer me though this, I shall be extremely grateful. David

2 years, 8 months

Re: [LAD] I'm being stalked, please be weary

by Jeanette C.

Apr 17 2023, Bearcat M. Şándor has written: > I haven't been paying attention lately, but this one caught mine. ... Thanks, this is very sweet. yes, I am safe. It didn't last long. I was lucky! Best wishes, Jeanette -- * Website: http://juliencoder.de - for summer is a state of sound * Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMS4rfGrTwz8W7jhC1Jnv7g * Audiobombs: https://www.audiobombs.com/users/jeanette_c * GitHub: https://github.com/jeanette-c You should take me as I am 'Cause I can promise you Baby, what you see is what you get <3 (Britney Spears)

2 years, 8 months

OT: tips for mail reader and / or address book management

by Alf Haakon Pietruszka Lund

Hello list! Off topic, but maybe some of you guys got any advice? I've mainly been using Thunderbird and Evolution as my mail readers, because they have powerful search capabilities and good folder and account management. But I find both seriously lacking in contact mangement. Editing contacts require loads of clicks and mouse navigation to enter info to those fields I use most often: Name, email (might be multiple), phone (might be multiple), Street Address, Organization / Company, Birthday, Notes. I'd like a spreadsheet approach instead: a simple list view of the preferred columns, right click to get a "Mail to" context and double click in a field to edit. Or something similar. And keyboard navigation, please. I want sync across devices (that is Android phone, PC and occasional webmail) but I don't want Google, so I'm using a CardDAV address book. Thunderbird doesn't even let me use cardDAV as default address book but saves all contacts to "Personal address book". Evolution opens contacts in a tabbed window without CTRL-TAB navigation. Etc. So. Does anyone here have pointers to mail readers with powerful search, good folder and account management AND good contact management? I'll happily accept personal mail to keep the OT clutter minimal. Thankful for any input.

2 years, 8 months

Transcoding from lossy to lossy with minimal loss...

by D.T.

Hello, I have a server with limited storage that I want to run a private radio station from, a randomized mix of my complete music collection. Locally I have about 80G of music in all sorts of formats, codecs and bitrates. This is way too large for the server's storage, I can use half of that at best. Additionally I don't want the stream to have too much bandwidth so it will work even over flaky (mobile) network connections. My thought is to transcode all of it to the same reduced format, then upload. That way the music server could just push it out without transcoding again (and I could still listen to separate tracks remotely). The Big Question: Which format should I choose? I found these 2 articles that seem to have an answer: https://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Transcoding#Lossy-to-lossy_tran… https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/HighQualityAudio Combined, it sounds to me like I really should use either FDK AAC or Opus* at less than 100kbps (I listen to 64k AAC music streams that are OK imo). What do you think? Is this even the right approach to solve the problem? TIA! FWIW, here's a breakdown of my music's codecs/bitrates: vorbis: 97 files (974M), average bitrate 332kbps (from 67 to 452) wmav2: 10 files (31M), average bitrate 131kbps (from 129 to 133) flac: 1216 files (45505M), average bitrate 1191kbps (from 330 to 5170) opus: 173 files (1024M), average bitrate 129kbps (from 76 to 177) mp3: 1975 files (32823M), average bitrate 197kbps (from 96 to 420) aac: 308 files (1592M), average bitrate 152kbps (from 64 to 334) alac: 1 files (621M), average bitrate 768kbps (from 768 to 768) * personally, I always had the feeling that opus (used a lot by youtube) isn't so good with noisy, grungy, fuzzy, guitarry music

2 years, 8 months

Re: Transcoding from lossy to lossy with minimal loss...

by Paul Davis

Gotcha. The format isn't going to matter much, so just convert the FLAC to some lossy codec and you're done. None of the lossy codecs are close to an order of magnitude better than any of the others, especially if you are space-limited. On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 19:50, D.T. <danter(a)posteo.de> wrote: > I really don't think you're getting the problem: > I want to stream from a remote server that has limited storage. > Whether the software can do transcoding on the fly is beside the > point because as it currently is > there isn't enough space on the server, therefore I must do > /something/ before I upload. > > The ability to then listen to the stream is not under debate. That > part is covered. > > To simplify, I'd really like an answer to the question how I can best > reduce my music collection to a unified, much reduced format. > > On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 13:40 -0600, Paul Davis wrote: >> both LMS and airsonic can do that >> >> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 19:32, D.T. <danter(a)posteo.de> wrote: >>> It's a virtual server. >>> I want to stream while mobile also, not only at home. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 13:18 -0600, Paul Davis wrote: >>>> Don't bother with transcoding. >>>> >>>> Just use the Logitech Media Server (open source, perl!) and it can >>>> handle all of the above. >>>> >>>> Players for just about any device you can name, and control apps >>>> for any browser as well as most devices. >>>> >>>> There's also Airsonic, which is web-based and quite nice, and also >>>> offers no rationale for transcoding to disk. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 19:07, D.T. <ohnonot-github(a)posteo.de> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> I have a server with limited storage that I want to run a private >>>>> radio station from, a randomized mix of my complete music >>>>> collection. >>>>> Locally I have about 80G of music in all sorts of formats, codecs >>>>> and bitrates. >>>>> This is way too large for the server's storage, I can use half of >>>>> that at best. >>>>> >>>>> Additionally I don't want the stream to have too much bandwidth >>>>> so it will work even over flaky (mobile) network connections. >>>>> >>>>> My thought is to transcode all of it to the same reduced format, >>>>> then upload. >>>>> That way the music server could just push it out without >>>>> transcoding again (and I could still listen to separate tracks >>>>> remotely). >>>>> >>>>> *The Big Question:* >>>>> Which format should I choose? >>>>> >>>>> I found these 2 articles that seem to have an answer: >>>>> <https://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Transcoding#Lossy-to-lossy_tran…> >>>>> <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/HighQualityAudio> >>>>> Combined, it sounds to me like I really should use either FDK AAC >>>>> or Opus* at less than 100kbps (I listen to 64k AAC music streams >>>>> that are OK imo). >>>>> >>>>> What do you think? >>>>> Is this even the right approach to solve the problem? >>>>> >>>>> TIA! >>>>> >>>>> FWIW, here's a breakdown of my music's codecs/bitrates: >>>>> >>>>> vorbis: 97 files (974M), average bitrate 332kbps (from 67 to 452) >>>>> wmav2: 10 files (31M), average bitrate 131kbps (from 129 to 133) >>>>> flac: 1216 files (45505M), average bitrate 1191kbps (from 330 to >>>>> 5170) >>>>> opus: 173 files (1024M), average bitrate 129kbps (from 76 to 177) >>>>> mp3: 1975 files (32823M), average bitrate 197kbps (from 96 to >>>>> 420) >>>>> aac: 308 files (1592M), average bitrate 152kbps (from 64 to 334) >>>>> alac: 1 files (621M), average bitrate 768kbps (from 768 to 768) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> * personally, I always had the feeling that opus (used a lot by >>>>> youtube) isn't so good with noisy, grungy, fuzzy, guitarry music >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-audio-user mailing list -- >>>> linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org >>>> <mailto:linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org> >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>> linux-audio-user-leave(a)lists.linuxaudio.org >>>> <mailto:linux-audio-user-leave@lists.linuxaudio.org> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-audio-user mailing list -- >> linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org >> <mailto:linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org> >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> linux-audio-user-leave(a)lists.linuxaudio.org >> <mailto:linux-audio-user-leave@lists.linuxaudio.org> >

2 years, 8 months

Re: Transcoding from lossy to lossy with minimal loss...

by Paul Davis

both LMS and airsonic can do that On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 19:32, D.T. <danter(a)posteo.de> wrote: > It's a virtual server. > I want to stream while mobile also, not only at home. > > > On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 13:18 -0600, Paul Davis wrote: >> Don't bother with transcoding. >> >> Just use the Logitech Media Server (open source, perl!) and it can >> handle all of the above. >> >> Players for just about any device you can name, and control apps for >> any browser as well as most devices. >> >> There's also Airsonic, which is web-based and quite nice, and also >> offers no rationale for transcoding to disk. >> >> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 19:07, D.T. <ohnonot-github(a)posteo.de> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I have a server with limited storage that I want to run a private >>> radio station from, a randomized mix of my complete music >>> collection. >>> Locally I have about 80G of music in all sorts of formats, codecs >>> and bitrates. >>> This is way too large for the server's storage, I can use half of >>> that at best. >>> >>> Additionally I don't want the stream to have too much bandwidth so >>> it will work even over flaky (mobile) network connections. >>> >>> My thought is to transcode all of it to the same reduced format, >>> then upload. >>> That way the music server could just push it out without >>> transcoding again (and I could still listen to separate tracks >>> remotely). >>> >>> *The Big Question:* >>> Which format should I choose? >>> >>> I found these 2 articles that seem to have an answer: >>> <https://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Transcoding#Lossy-to-lossy_tran…> >>> <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/HighQualityAudio> >>> Combined, it sounds to me like I really should use either FDK AAC >>> or Opus* at less than 100kbps (I listen to 64k AAC music streams >>> that are OK imo). >>> >>> What do you think? >>> Is this even the right approach to solve the problem? >>> >>> TIA! >>> >>> FWIW, here's a breakdown of my music's codecs/bitrates: >>> >>> vorbis: 97 files (974M), average bitrate 332kbps (from 67 to 452) >>> wmav2: 10 files (31M), average bitrate 131kbps (from 129 to 133) >>> flac: 1216 files (45505M), average bitrate 1191kbps (from 330 to >>> 5170) >>> opus: 173 files (1024M), average bitrate 129kbps (from 76 to 177) >>> mp3: 1975 files (32823M), average bitrate 197kbps (from 96 to 420) >>> aac: 308 files (1592M), average bitrate 152kbps (from 64 to 334) >>> alac: 1 files (621M), average bitrate 768kbps (from 768 to 768) >>> >>> >>> * personally, I always had the feeling that opus (used a lot by >>> youtube) isn't so good with noisy, grungy, fuzzy, guitarry music >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-audio-user mailing list -- >> linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org >> <mailto:linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org> >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> linux-audio-user-leave(a)lists.linuxaudio.org >> <mailto:linux-audio-user-leave@lists.linuxaudio.org> >

2 years, 8 months

Setting up jackd2/jackdbus

by Bill Purvis

Hi folks, I'm trying to set up a fairly minimal system as a dedicated Digital Organ. I started with Ubuntu Mate 22.04, as that's what I normally use for my personal systems. During the install I requested a minimal system, no Office, etc. and ended up with what looked OK. However, When it came to setting up the audio side, I wanted to run Jack(D2/DBUS) and use Qjackctl for initial setting up. I'm hoping to dispense with Qjackctl once its all working, though the patchbay might keep it in. I want a system that comes up headless (normally) so the organist just switches on, waits for a couple of minutes for it to start, then starts playing. I'm having great difficulty in getting Qjackctl and Jack to start reliably, I've tried jackd2 and jackdbus (from the standard Ubuntu repositories) and Qjackctl nearly always fails with messages saying it can't contact jack: 'Server communications error, plesae check the message window for more info'. The window then says 'Cannot read socket fd = 36 err = Success' which seems contradictory! If anyone can help I'd like opinions on whether I should be pushing for jackd2 or jackdbus. The idea is to have a startup script which starts jack, then qjackctl, then the organ software (GrandOrgue). So far it's a mess. Someone must know what I need to do. I'm happy to collect any information and report back if you can tell me what is needed. Many thanks in advance! Bill -- +----------------------------------------+ | Bill Purvis | | email: bill(a)billp.org | +----------------------------------------+

2 years, 8 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-user