I'm going about the process of trying to learn what goes into commercial
mastering (yeah, I know...), and one of the conundrums I've run into is
that while most commercially produced music has a particular sort of
common EQ curve to it, I have to really force myself to try to want that
curve when I'm mixing. Really, it just sounds cold. Almost anything
sounds better (at least on good speakers) with less cutting around
120-180Hz than most CD's seem to have. And it really must be the result
of EQ cuts too -- apart from my digital Yamaha SY99 (which sounds pretty
cold), I don't think I have any instruments in my whole studio that
could produce sound so anemic in the low mids as what I hear on CD's
without *lots* of cuts. When it comes down to it, there's almost no
instrument that really sounds like that.
So, my dilemma is twofold...
1) To use spectrum analyzers and careful listening to try to understand
the "tone" that the commercial mastering world has apparently agreed on,
and
2) To figure out why I would want that. On most decent speakers, it
seems to sound thin and lack authority. It's terrible having to cater
to the lowest common denominator.
Anyone else have this problem? Ever wish you could turn up those low
mids just a little bit more and get some power underneath?
--
+ Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys
+ Sr. UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will
+ University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of
+ James Franck Institute + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet,
+ Materials Research Ctr + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky
I don't use Ubuntu/Debian but I do use Linux-rt + nVidia, in all of my H/W.
So i thought i would clarify a point or two;
> Found some suggestions about patching the nvidia driver with some
> custom> code here [1], but the driver they use there is quite old. And
last
>time I had fiddled with nvidia driver it was the most painful experience
> ever..:)
>
>Did you try the patch in my Github repository? You can download it with:
>wgethttps://raw.github.com/AutoStatic/nvidia-rt/master/patch-3.0-rt-nvidia.…
This above patch only works for Nvidia driver < 325.xx ...
1. For Nvidia's newest drivers ~ you need my nvidia325xx-rt patch;
http://sourceforge.net/projects/l-proaudio/files/nvidia-325xx-rt.patch/down…
(for me, this patch works fine on 3.8-rt and 3.10-rt. haven't tested
anything older... I'm sure it's fine). When building the kernel module
(don't know where this is done in Debian/ubuntu) you must ignore the
PREEMPT_RT check in nvidia's installer, something like this;
" make IGNORE_PREEMPT_RT_PRESENCE=1
SYSSRC=/usr/lib/modules/"${_kernver}/build" module "
2. I've also made available a patch for 319.32, patched for kernel 3.10
support (which then can be patched with the old rt patch, above
"patch-3.0-rt-nvidia.patch"). - This is mainly for people who've
experienced regressions with the 325xx nvidia driver, Patch is here;
http://sourceforge.net/projects/l-proaudio/files/nVidia-319.32_lk310.patch/…
I've also started a thread @ nvidia's dev portal about nvidia-rt;
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/572468/linux/nvidia-325-15-linux-r…
There aren't specific distro instructions, but a general "run down",
instead. I don't know how different distros package nvidia, so it's beyond
my own scope...and Since, i only use Archlinux, it is the only distro that
i personally am concerned with. + anyone can see how Archlinux handles
nvidia-rt by either reading through Arch's PKGBUILD in AUR;
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nv/nvidia-rt/PKGBUILD ... then find out
how to made your own distro apply what is needed.
cheerz
Jordan
>
> Did you consider building your own kernel? I'm using self-built RT
> kernels on Ubuntu 12.04 and that works great:
>
> http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/system_configuration#build_your_own_real-ti…
> And are you using rtirq?
> Alessio Abogani stopped maintaining th RT kernels for Ubuntu quite a
> while ago. You might want to ask falkTX about the possibilities of
> offering a raring RT kernel.
>
> Best,
>
> Jeremy
>
>
Hey Jeremy!
Yes, that's the other thing I will try now, good to know it works on 12.04.
My pain in the a... is that I have to use nvidia drivers, and had troubles
some time ago with them and rt-kernels.
Do you happen to know whether I need to patch nvidia support into the
rt-kernel I build? (I guess so... just to be sure)
thanks!
best,
M
Hey all,
I just switched to Mint Olivia 15 (based on Ubuntu Raring 13.04). I use
quite cpu-intensive puredata patches with processing of 2 live audio inputs
on a firewire soundcard through ffado and qjackctl (jack2).
Although my machine runs a low-latency kernel and it has been configured
for pro audio (I use the realtimeConfigurationScan script), I still get
xruns and sometimes qjackctl randomly hangs up making the sound to stop
completely.
Before, I used to work with ubuntu 10.04 and rt-kernel without a itch. Is
anybody still using a rt-kernel with the latest Mint or Ubuntu, or just
refining settings etc..?
if a rt-kernel is the best option, should I patch mine, since it looks like
there are no packaged rt-kernels for Raring?
Can't access Abogani ppa, and KXS kernels are available up to Precise.
thanks in advance for any hint, or suggestions about what to try!
best wishes,
--
Marco Donnarumma
New Media + Sonic Arts Practitioner, Performer, Teacher, Director.
Embodied Audio-Visual Interaction Research Team.
Department of Computing, Goldsmiths University of London
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Portfolio: http://marcodonnarumma.com
Research: http://res.marcodonnarumma.com
Director: http://www.liveperformersmeeting.net
Entirely OT, but I had a lecture at Uni yesterday and the first slide was
talking about Eclipse and how it's 'open source, so it means it's free to
use for both commercial and non-commercial purposes'.
Needless to say, I cringed at the "definition".
We now return you to your regularly scheduled linux audio
related discussions.
hi guys!
i'm sure you all have seen your share of professional audio, video, and
lighting gear that apparently runs embedded linux but never mentions it
much (unless you happen upon the briefly flashing penguins immediately
after booting)...
i just came across the midas pro2 (which i have to learn for an upcoming
job), and lo and behold, in the manual, midas saith:
"The PRO2 uses the reliable Linux operating system."
not exactly in the brochure afaict, but in the very prominent first
section of the manual. :)
other expensive boxes i've seen and used which appear to be running linux:
* Allen & Heath iLive and GLD series audio mixers
* LAWO mc² series of audio mixers
* grandMA2 series of lighting controllers
* the DirectOut M.1k2 16x16 MADI router
none of these make a secret out of their OS, but it doesn't seem to be
an advertising item, either. is it because people are generally
disinterested in and/or frightened by the fact that their gear has to
have some sort of operating system inside? i wonder if we'll live to see
the day where "linux inside" is a hot marketing punchline.
i wonder if you guys have seen other pro gear whose data gets shuffled
around by industrious yet unseen penguins under the hood?
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487
Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister VDT
http://stackingdwarves.net
[Sorry if this is a dupe, I got a weird server error the first time I
sent it.]
On 09/08/2013 06:37 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 08/26/2013 02:49 AM, Dave Phillips wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> An ominous but not an anonymous tango :
>>
> a perfect score for another "battle of wesnoth" campaign with loads of
> undead...
>
>
It's the Tango Of The Living Dead.
New "improved" version at
http://linux-sound.org/audio/Tango.mp3http://linux-sound.org/audio/Tango.ogg
Middle section is extended with a bit of new material. Same crappy
sounds though, so if anyone wants to have some fun re-orchestrating it
(hi Will!) here's the MIDI file :
http://linux-sound.org/audio/tango2.mid
It's set up for standard GM layout.
Best,
dp