On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 06:45 -0800, Louis Gorenfeld wrote:
> Haha, good thing you didn't see the Vocaloid booth at NAMM! Oh man.
>
> But I do agree it's unprofessional for a Linux distribution to default
> to that wallpaper (and are there copyright issues?).
I'm not sure if this really is OT, since for me it isn't. Linux audio is
about freedom and a harmless default wallpaper about something from a
creative commons music community inflame passions of some Linux users.
Why? It's free from porn, showing a virtual "school girl" singer.
And other wallpapers are more professional, just because this default
wallpaper does show a "school girl"?
Why should there be copy right issues? The idea of creative commons is
to avoid copyright issues.
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/35879
For me it's very strange that it's classified as porn.
It doesn't fit to my taste, there is some commercial background, but
it's about creative commons music and free from porn. Even the minimal
erotic is that harmless, that in Germany you're allowed to show this
picture in a kindergarten or elementary school. Most default wallpapers
I've seen are much more worse, completely without erotic, but instead of
that unskilled art, that I would protect children against those
unaesthetic wallpapers.
Regards,
Ralf
> So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?
well, at last i know.
that's the overall approach to grow the community by any means.
which is about quantity, but not quality.
so, there's too much attraction for people that want to be unlike the others,
but can't motivate their choise in any other way.
needless to say that they are doomed to be forever unhappy with their
choise, since what they really want is another clone of win and/or mac
way.
and why do we need growing the community by any means?
that's the most obvious way to show to the others that we're respectable too.
but that's the dead end.
and that's all. the next message will be what i like about linux audio
as THE DIFFERENT approach (as i promised :))
On 02/09/2013 04:59 AM, David L. Craig wrote:
> On 13Feb08:1918-1000, david wrote:
>
>> On 02/08/2013 05:10 AM, David L. Craig wrote:
>>> On 13Feb08:0755-0600, Stephen Stubbs wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/8/2013 1:43 AM, david wrote:
>>>>> http://visual.ly/psychology-music?utm_source=visually_embed
>>>>>
>>>> So now we have quantitative proof that the Ancient Greeks' views on
>>>> music were correct.
>>>>
>>>> Music is not an art but a science, with well defined laws that
>>>> enable the musician to induce specific effects and emotions in the
>>>> listener.
>>>
>>> So explain how Western peoples feel sad in minor keys
>>> while Middle Eastern peoples do not, just to mention
>>> one non-universal emotional reaction.
>>
>> I don't think emotional reactions are as directly connected with
>> usage of specific brain centers. As the success of cognitive therapy
>> for some problems, emotional reactions are learned. Cultures help
>> teach that, too.
>
> So then you admit your scientific laws do not enable the
> musician to induce specific effects and emotions in the
> listener.
I think you're confusing me with some other poster. The "Music is not an
art but a science" comment above is from some one else.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community
http://clanjones.org/david/http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/
Virtual MIDI Piano Keyboard is a MIDI events generator and receiver. It
doesn't produce any sound by itself, but can be used to drive a MIDI
synthesizer (either hardware or software, internal or external). You can use
the computer's keyboard to play MIDI notes, and also the mouse. You can use
the Virtual MIDI Piano Keyboard to display the played MIDI notes from
another instrument or MIDI file player.
Changes for v0.5.1:
* Fixed bug #3599827. No default keyboard shortcuts available in 0.5.0 on
fresh installations
* Qt5 build compatibility (but not fully functional)
Requirements for all platforms: CMake-2.8 and Qt-4.8 or later.
Please use the mailing list <vmpk-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net> for questions
and comments. Thanks.
Copyright (C) 2008-2013, Pedro López-Cabanillas and others
License: GPL v3
More info
http://vmpk.sourceforge.net
Downloads
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vmpk/files/vmpk/0.5.1/
Regards,
Pedro
Hi,
I was a long term jackd1 user and my first action on a new linux
installation (mostly using Ubuntu) was normally to remove pulseaudio as
it was badly configured and/or buggy. Things have changed and I really
started to like PA for everyday stuff. And then jackdbus came along
which together with the device reservation API and the jackd sinks
promised to make using these two things together more easy. This mostly
works fine, except for the device reservation bug in PA which is easy to
work around though:
- Make sure no audio process is actively using the soundcard you want
jackd to use
- Run pulseaudio -k
- Run jack_control start
I have noticed some issues with jackdbus though:
a] jack_control start sometimes doesn't work at all after the first time
it failed to aquire the device. A killall -9 jackdbus is in order to
restore it
b] after some hours of operation jackdbus starts to eat 100% cpu on two
of my four cores.
Are these known issues? I use Ubuntu 12.10 and jackd:
fps@mango 12:08:21 .../Games/Xonotic/ $ jackd -v
jackdmp 1.9.9
[...]
How to diagnose the 100% cpu thing more closely? The
~.log/jack/jackdbus.log shows nothing suspicious.
Thanks and regards,
Flo
--
Florian Paul Schmidt
http://fps.io
On Sat, February 9, 2013 1:48 am, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was a long term jackd1 user and my first action on a new linux
> installation (mostly using Ubuntu) was normally to remove pulseaudio as
> it was badly configured and/or buggy. Things have changed and I really
> started to like PA for everyday stuff. And then jackdbus came along
> which together with the device reservation API and the jackd sinks
> promised to make using these two things together more easy. This mostly
> works fine, except for the device reservation bug in PA which is easy to
> work around though:
>
> - Make sure no audio process is actively using the soundcard you want
> jackd to use
> - Run pulseaudio -k
> - Run jack_control start
There is a real fix in the pipe line... not sure when it will get into
releases. I find:
pasuspender --sleep 5 & ; jack_control start
Will allow me to start jackdbus even while pulse is streaming. Actually I
use pasuspender from qjackctl to do the same thing.
> I have noticed some issues with jackdbus though:
>
> a] jack_control start sometimes doesn't work at all after the first time
> it failed to aquire the device. A killall -9 jackdbus is in order to
> restore it
jack_control exit works for me. This is part of the bug above, when
jackdbus fails to get the device, the jackd part dies but the dbus part
doesn't (it seems, I don't know the code well enough) It would be
interesting to compare this behaviour with jackd2.
> b] after some hours of operation jackdbus starts to eat 100% cpu on two
> of my four cores.
I have left jackdbus running for at least 5 days and have not seen this
show up. PA has been used during that time (audacious and fire fox) as
well as other jack clients. I would be interested to know if running jackd
instead of jackdbus is the same or different.
There are some patches on the way for jack2 in ubuntu as well. (in testing)
>
> Are these known issues? I use Ubuntu 12.10 and jackd:
>
> fps@mango 12:08:21 .../Games/Xonotic/ $ jackd -v
> jackdmp 1.9.9
> [...]
I am using the alpha 13.04 on this machine and 12.04 on another.
joe@studio1304:~$ jackd -v
jackdmp 1.9.9.4
The plan is that once the jackd patches are tested they will be SRU to
12.04 and 12.10.
--
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net
Does anyone have any experience of using a MIDI-over-USB dumb keyboard?
Does it need special drivers or can I just plug it in and have it automatically
found by my machine?
I'm hoping to be able to use Yoshimi on my netbook at an impromptu gig.
I'm running a cut-down debian, but will get qjackctl from the repository (which
usually fetches and configures everything else I need.
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
Are there any advantages to using 96k (or 48k?) if the final target is
44.1k/16bit? I am thinking that tracking at 44.1k / 24 bit should be
more than sufficient for most (non-pro) purposes?
I read somewhere about higher bitrate being important for headroom for
audio processing plugins, but does samplerate also have an effect on
this?
James