Can anyone suggest ways to compare audio/midi performance between Linux
and Windows that (1) are relevant to non-technical musicians and (2)
make Linux compare favorably?
Not things like "I just don't like Windows" or software feature
comparisons or the politics of open vs. closed source, but rather things
like responsiveness to audio interrupts, RAM footprint of the OS and ...?
I work for a company that sells a Linux based piece of hardware that
plays windows VSTs. We spend alot of time on compatibility, especially
on getting the plugins to work with Wine. I often get asked about
switching to Windows and I don't have a good answer.
My sense is that the main benefit of Linux is that audio interrupts are
serviced faster and more predictably than in Windows because of
SCHED_FIFO and Linux's low overhead. And clearly musicians could feel
that, especially at lower buffer size settings so that's the kind of
thing that could matter.
But is it _really_ true? Is there a standard way to measure it? Or
published results about it?
Are there any other things to compare? Thanks for any input. I _want_ to
believe! %) ... mo
PS: apologies for any confusion that comes from posting to both
linux-dev and linux-user. I wasn't sure which list this is more
appropriate to...?
Another late night (early morning). Yet another tune that had to be
finished over the weekend ... ish!
I actually started working on it a few weeks before I started on East
To West but hit a creative block, so put it to one side for a while.
One problem I had was getting a soft drum sound. This was something I
couldn't find in any of the hydrogen kits, nor in the drumsets on THREE
different hardware synths. The drum I wanted to emulate is, I think,
Irish in origin. It is a hand held drum and the single stick is double
ended and leather padded, looking something like a dog bone. Eventually
I was able to create something like it in Zyn.
I also wanted a shaken tambourine and this seems just as hard to find.
I used a combination of effects in Zyn. to get somewhere near it, but
it isn't really right.
Anyway, the results so far are on:
http://www.musically.me.uk/music/Celtic_Dream.ogghttp://www.musically.me.uk/music/Celtic_Dream.mp3
--
Will J G
hey!! hallo everybody again
I've released a pair of smooth & very minimal house trax made with
linux, they are two simple beats, very very minimal, with clicks,
noises & that sort of things...
They are not very complicated, but I had to release them :)
u can download them here:
http://perlssdj.blogspot.com/2007/01/atomic-dreams-very-very-minimal-house.…
enjoy them, & B happy ;)
PD: Hydrogen is the best tool I've ever found t create rithm patterns :)
PerlssDj
--
... subliminal stuff at http://perlssdj.blogspot.com...
> 6. Re: debian / ubuntu (Hartmut Noack)
> nor has the Ubuntu-Stock-Kernel anymore, so there is no big reason
> anymore to prefer Ubuntu over Debian. There are some freindly tools in
> Ubuntu, that try to help you out, if something is not set up OK during
> Install but those do not help that much actually, as the Installer
> finds and sets up everything the System knows so if you got a
> problem, that is not solved by the Installer, your chances for easily
> resolving it with Ubuntu-Tools is slim and by any means not much
> better than on Debian.
Don't forget that Ubuntu is based on Debian "unstable". The nice things
in Ubuntu actually come from Debian - it's just that these things have
taken a little while to get through to Debian testing or stable. My
preference always lies at the sign of the red swirly thing, Ubuntu
always seems to have a problem somewhere (just my experience from a
while ago).
>
> At the other Hand: a distro is as good as the softwarepackages that
> can be installed upon and as one can install Debian-Packages on buntu
> and vice versa, it turns out to be a matter of personal taste, what
> becomes you best....
Debian & Ubuntu are *not* always compatible & interchangeable: Ubuntu is
based on Debian but many things are recompiled for Ubuntu. A friend of
mine trashed an Ubuntu installation by trying to add apps from Debian &
DeMuDi. I would have to say that you should always ask yourself the
following question if thinking of cross-installing Debian & Ubuntu
packages: the question is "do you feel lucky?"
Gavin.
Now that demudi.agnula.org seems to have been taken over, is there any
other site that has a copy of this distribution?
Is it wise at this point to continue using it? I just recently installed
it, so I'm not overly comitted to it yet.
I'm looking for a distribution that would be suitable for a rackmount
PC-based synthesizer that I can take to occasional gigs.
DeMuDi seems to fit the bill, because it is nice and trimmed down, as
opposed to (I suspect) Planet CCRMA.
Larry
Does anyone know of any linux apps that use sdif? Anything that
synthesizes from sdif, allows for manipulation of the data,
visualization of the data?
Thanks,
Alex
Hello,
I have been asked to organize/setup a recording system for a community
event that will involve recording a single session of around three hours
every day. The audio consists of some speaches and some live music and
singing.
It is a volunteer effort and I suppose they do not have much funds to
invest for this recording setup. They already have a 2.5 GHz computer
with 512 MB of arm (I can use the computer in whatever way I deem
necessary), a bunch of older computers (maybe around 500 MHz with 256MB
RAM lying around), a 12 channel mixer which has around 4 or 6 mics
connecteted to it and an amplifier.
Here is my first tentative idea. Split the Sub R and Sub L output of the
audio board (currently they are connected to an amplifier) and take one
part of both of these channels to the Line In of a computer (and the
other parts go to the amplifier). Install Ubuntu (or maybe another
distro) and use Audacity to do the recording (I am more familiar with
Linux, haven't considered Windows yet). I understand that in Audacity I
can specify the duration of the recording. So it appears that it won't
be difficult for anybody to start Audacity, type in the duration in the
"duration window" (say, 3h00m00s) and press "record". Hopefully,
Audacity can be set to record directly to ogg format.
This way, I won't have to be present there all the time to start or stop
the recording and also won't need to post process the audio to get it
into ogg (if it were recorded in Wav to begin with).
I haven't done this kind of a project before. I am assuming:
1. The outputs Sub R and Sub L are can be directly connected to a Line
In of an audio device
2. The PC I mentioned above would be sufficient to do live recording and
encoding without any problems.
3. Audacity is appropriate for this project.
4. The computer's line in would be sufficient for a fine quality recording.
Having said this, I would sure love to have some advice from experienced
users. Also, I need to buy these connectors and cables:
- 1/4 in. mono pins to two RCA connectors (Y connector),
- a two RCA to 1/8 in. connector (Sub RL -> Line In of comp.), and
- RCA-RCA connector(Sub RL RCA -> amp.). Any recommendation for a good
place (I don't want the quality of the audio to suffer just because of
low-quality cables)? Also, any suggestions on how far can I take the
recording computer from the audio board's outputs (cable length
problem). And, if a Line In of a computer is not good enough, which
sound card should I look for?
Thanks,
->HS
Folks,
I will be building an audiophile/home theater system soon. I'm starting with
2-channel and want to make my way up to 4 (i don't like center channels).
I'm using my computer as the front end. I'd like to use USB, Firewire or
wireless as my "transmission lines".
As far as multichannel goes, i'd imagine that even if i split audio into front
and back and sent each to a wireless Slim Devices Transporter (
http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_transporter.html) that the two tranporters
would not be in synch.
So, is a firewire device like the Apogee Rosetta 800 a solution? Will a linux
movie player using xine or gstreamer be able to send the correct channels of
the Dolby Digital/DTS to the individual channels on a multi-channel pro
device?
This all assumes that Freebob (the firewire driver) works as advertised.
I realize i can just send a dolby digital/DTS signal to the Transporter and
then on to a pre/pro but that adds another link in the chain.
Thanks all.
Hi
I'm in the process of making a cd with my linux based compositions. I'd
like the compositions to float into each other with small atmospheric
interludes. I make interludes and compositions as separate wave-files
that needs to be spliced together. Since they are still redone all the
time, I don't feel like chaining everything together by hand, lowering
volume of interludes (that are normalized) and making markers for cd
tracks just to get a demo-snapshot of everything.
Is there a tool out there that will do this for me, or should I simply
write a small script in python?
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk | quintet: http://www.anagrammer.dk
| compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions