Ken Restivo:
>>>
>>> There are actually very good reasons to use ardour for post-processing of
>>> live-recordings:
>>> - Its completely non-destructive, even if you slice your 2-hour-file into
>>> 10-seconds snippets and rearrange them and delete them one-by-one, you still
>>> don't loose the material. Yes, you should have backups, but who knows...
>>> - Its _very_ easy to apply mastering effects over the whole session. (And
>>> with the jamin-control-plugin you can change settings between songs.)
>>> - And all editing on effects and automation is non-destructive too. That is
>>> very nice compared to clicking "apply effect (silence)", having the computer
>>> work for ten minutes and the realize that a) its the wrong effect and b)
>>> the "create undo" wasn't selected.
>>> - ardour is definitely not trying to load the whole 2-hour file into ram...
>>
>> Don't forget the CD markers -> TOC export for creating CDs easily with
>> Ardour. Works great for live CDs where you want to add track
>> boundaries with no gaps for disk-at-once burning.
>>
>
> That's it. Next time I will use Ardour.
>
> It would be very nice to split a 90-minute liveset up into multiple,
> song-length WAV's, but it was too much hassle to do that in Audacity. I
> suspect it'd be very easy to do in Ardour.
>
It is very easy to do that in Snd. Snd also handles large files
appropriately (by reading from harddisk while playing and using cached
peak files). Using snd-ls, you can just mark the area you want in a new
file, and right click, select copy to new or save selection.
hi,
I'm facing similar crappy IRQ settings on my Thinkpad R61 here as
Svend-Erik described - my cardbus shares it's interrupt with the
graphicscard.
I spent 2 nights now to play around with the (only available) settings
in bios, which was to adjust pcibusses from preadjusted "11" to anything
else and finally "automatic" - without any success. I tried to switch
off APIC, ACPI, I tried pci=assign_busses - nothing changed.
I wonder if it would make sense then to spend the money for a device
like E-MU 1616 or even RME Multiface...
Things seem to be a little better on firewire - the 1394 only shares
it's interrupt with a unused usbbus and the also unused onbordsound -
would it be probably the better way to go for a, lets say, Presonus Firepod?
I'm sorry to further stress that exasperating hardware item but it's
really a pain to find a solution - there is a huge amount of info out
there in the web - but finding something which really leads one further
can be a punishment.
thanks a lot for any hints
Susanne
Can someone recommend an audio editor for editing a 90-minute-long WAV file?
I almost always use Rezound for songs (2-10 minutes long, ususallyl), which I like a lot, but it chokes on big huge files-- too slow, crashes, gets kicked out of the JACK graph, and generally sucks.
-ken
Hi
I'm into shapeing up my system to work better. I have installed a Debian
lenny and migrated 64Studio multimedia packets on to it, and use
64studio's kernel 2.6.21-1-multimedia-486, then installed irqbalance and
try to find the best setup for my RME Hammerfall Multiface card.
I use a lenove T61 laptop and my problem is that the PCMCIA card share
IRQ with some usb device on IRQ 16:
debian:~$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
16: 5328 20016 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4, yenta,hdsp
I want to move my hdsp to another IRQ, but can't figure out howto, it is
a matter of firmware version on my Multiface card ? I can't move the
PCMCIA card since there is only one available slot....
/Sv-e
N. Gey wrote:
For me there are only two serious audio distributions:
64Studio (Debian based) 64bit and 32bit
or Jacklab (OpenSuse) 32bit
64Studio is stable and has gnome and a nice packaging system, but is
also (like debian) a bit conservative with nonfree Software.
Jacklab is more about experiments but things like linux-vst and wineasio
are part of the concept. Jacklab comes with KDE or E17.
greetings,
Nils on 64Studio
You're bound to get some comments on a post like that!
I agree that studio64 is probably the best. I don't use Suse on the getting in bed with the devil principle. But I also prefer Kde or Xfce to Gnome.
The latest Musix is very impressive, though maybe not really cutting edge. dyne:bolic is very cool.
However I make most music on my everyday Debian/kde testing, which is updated regularly. No RT kernel like Studio64 or Musix etc., but Jack still runs nice with about 6ms latency on the vanilla kernel. And no rebooting after browsing, mailing or killing evil zombies in a 3d game. :)
Roger
>
> >> Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:56:45 -0700 From: Bob van der Poel
> >> <bob(a)mellowood.ca> Subject: [LAU] MIDI controlled slideshow? To: A
> >> list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org>
> >> Message-ID: <484C71BD.1090806(a)mellowood.ca> Content-Type:
> >> text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm sure I'm not the first to think of this ... but I haven't found
> >> anything on google, etc. Must be searching wrong?
> >>
> >> Anyway, I was wondering if there was any software out there which
> >> would let me control a slideshow from a midi track? I'd like to
> >> have the midi going out to a synth and dedicate one channel (split
> >> out) to display images on my monitor.
> >>
> >> Ideas of existing software for this??
>
> I looked into some stuff like this briefly a while ago. We use a (expensive) program on windoze called Resolume at work for this, and I was just wondering if Linux could do it. A program called VeeJay was quite good, and also Gephex. Look for Linux VJ programs, I'm sure some can be MIDI controlled, and usually play video, add effects as well as stills. Sorry I cant narrow it down better (I'm a sound engineer, not a VJ), but you may not have considered this type of app yet and you could be lucky.
Roger
On Fri 13/06/08 2:04 PM, "Christian Delahousse" christian.delahousse(a)gmail.com wrote::
> Hey Guys,
>
> I started playing with Ubuntu Studio and Linux about a year ago and I
> now feel that I am passed the beginner level. I dont have an indepth
> knowledge of the command-line but I do know my way around, I have a
> good knowledge of the way things work and Ive learned the software
> fairly well.
>
> Lately, Ubuntu Studio has been getting on my nerves with all the
> bloat. I just want a system for digital signal processing (ie. a
> computer version of a guitar pedal board) with the lowest latency
> possible and Ubuntu seems to be taking up alot of space and resources.
>
> So, I think Im at the level where I can benefit from a stream lined,
> more "user-unfriendly" system.
If you are watching resources why don't you just install fluxbox and use that as your wm instead of a desktop environment like gnome. Fluxbox allows you to keybind it like crazy. It is light and fast. You can edit the menu really easily using some of the utilities that come with fluxbox or using vim. You can put whatever scripts you want or need in the menu. I am sure you can all of this stuff in any WM though.
>
> Firstly, do you guys think that a move away from Ubuntu Studio would
> be beneficial?
Not at all. A big waste of time. I started out on Debian. Then moved to Red Hat. I liked RH but ran into problems. It was not a big deal. I fixed them. I switched then to Gentoo. In Gentoo I spent LOTS of time being a Sysadmin. I was always wondering what is the right very of jack that I should be running for ultimate stability. Then I had to recompile stuff that was compiled against jack. That was also not the only problems I had. I then discovered Ubuntu. I have never used anything else since. That is except for a server I have that runs Debian. I love Debian and Debian based distros. Very easy. It is very simple create your own .debs if needed. In Gentoo I spent lots of time writing all these .ebuild files because I was not satisfied with the overlay's ebuilds. Anyway, I am using Ubuntu know. I actually use gnome for everything I do because it seems to perform fine. I have not had any troubles with it. My wife likes it and thinks its easy. She can update it and install things if she needs to. I tried Studio64. It was nice but did not see really any advantage over Ubuntu Studio.
Jeremiah
> Secondly, what would you guys suggest as a good alternative?
>
> Ive heard good things about Studio64 and Debian... Any advantages
> with these?
>
> Ill be installing it on a AMD64 equipped laptop. I want the focus to
> be on realtime stuff but I might run a few WINE apps and maybe VSTs.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
> This could be worth a read:
>
> http://www.gimp.org/unix/howtos/gimp-midi.html
>
> It's something I'm interested in doing myself, but haven't had the
> time to try it yet - I'd be interested in your thoughts on GIMP & MIDI.
>
> Gavin.
I've not noticed this before but it interested me. I've done some
experimenting, only to find that the controller channels don't work
properly. I've filed a bug report with the GIMP (
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=537960 ) and a patch which has
been accepted so if you do want to try it, you might want to have quick
look at the bug report to see what might happen.
Simon Fielding
OK, I managed to make the audio work with ALSA, but, for MIDI, a
specific driver is used and, guess what? only Windows and OSX versions
are provided... well, at least i have audio, but patch programming
would be much easier with usb-midi working :(.
Thanks,
Pedro
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:23 PM, R Dicaire <kritek(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Pedro Ferreira <ilzogoiby(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> lsusb shows:
>> ...
>> Bus 003 Device 007: ID 0582:00db Roland Corp.
>
> While the usb bus may recognize the device, you may need a driver for
> it. Have you looked on Boss' website for one?
>
> --
> aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present:
> http://www.ardynet.com
> http://www.ardynet.com:9000/ardymusic.ogg.m3u
>
Hi
I have a couple of samples I'd like to statically apply reverb to. I
tried both mhwaveedit and audacity, but can't figure out how. Esp since
the sample is gonna be longer with the applied reverb.
What's the easiest way to achieve this?
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://atte.dk | http://myspace.com/attejensenhttp://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk