The venue where I work has just been given a new Soundcraft Si3 console
(Thank you Harman!).
There is an option card available for this console which provides direct
outs via MADI56 or MADI64. Does anyone know of a piece of supported
hardware that will allow me to record shows on my laptop with Ardour?
--
Rick Green
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-Benjamin Franklin
"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our
safety and our ideals."
-President Barack Obama 20 Jan 2009
Hello everyone and Tim especially!
I was wondering of late, would it be possible to allow a higher tempo for
the clicktrack, perhaps 360BPM? Why that fast? I'm ever more leaning towards
odd time signatures, but I have a bad feeling for those. :-( So I need a
clicktrack just pounding away 8th notes. I didn't find any good substitute. Of
course you can program klick and I think it supports all those odd ones, but I
don't go by programming, when making music. I have a theme in my mind and just
play.
In general thanks for this clicktrack, it has been a reliable and
indespensible companion for years now and I intend to get a few more years of
use out of it. :-)
Warm regards
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
*Igor Brkic wrote:*
>On Monday, November 22, 2010, Gregory Joyce <gkjoyce at gmail.com <http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user>> wrote:
>>* I like puredata for sound design because usually once that is set up*>>* it's fairly static. I don't really like "composing" in puredata*>>* though.*>>**>>* So what I am asking is this:*>>* Is there some sort of nyquist-like program that will allow me to edit*>>*. a text file which will send OSC or midi data to PD (or anywhere).*>>* ...**
>*
> You can try Fluxus (http://www.pawfal.org/fluxus/). It looks like the
> thing you are looking for. Never tried it though (tried to compile it
> few times but never succeeded).
Fluxus is designed for live coding and uses OSC messaging. It has MIDI
capabilities, and is scheme based like nyquist (?) but designed more for
openGL graphics. It does have it's own synth engine, fluxa.
Check out Gabor Papp's Hack-a-day log for examples of fluxus live coding:
http://mndl.hu/hackpact
Fluxus is included in Pure:dyne, a live usb distribution, so there is no
excuse not to try it, and is packaged for fedora, ubuntu, arch and osx.
Compiling can be a challenge, it took some time to track down all the
dependencies, compile plt-scheme with the right switches then compile
fluxus, but by following the README file, I was able to get it done.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Lorenzo Sutton <lsutton(a)libero.it> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how much spreading word to international audiences will really
> help, as it looks like "certain people" in Italy don't seem to care much
> about our international reputation falling daily thanks to sex scandals,
> pleasantries and the likes.
>
>
yeah, but thanks god "certain people" is not all of us... Anyway there was
also this video, in italian, from some time before, which managed to get on
the front page of repubblica.it (a main italian newspaper)!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqrSzgvF8gk
> Anyway thumbs up for the creative initiative! :)
>
>
thanks :)
renato
Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> Nice video. I relayed it to the local head of student representatives,
> maybe it will help spreading it.
>
>
great, thanks ;)
> The whole thing looks like a contest to me, and Austria isn't far behind
> Italy.
>
> Best regards from little Italy (aka. Carinthia/Austria)
>
> Philipp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
hi... i thought i take this to lau to get an impression on users
feelings.
here is the story. i basically wanted to improve the heuristics for
client zombification. i wanted jack to only kick clients which take a
whole cpu slice. the result would be that you can overload the cpu
with well behaving clients, and jack would not act on it.
the result in a synchronous jackd (jackd1/tschack or jackd2 -S)
would be continuous xruns, and probably bad noise.
the problem is that its not 100% possible to identify the bad client,
and its always possible, that we might kick an inocent client.
so many people on jack-dev advocate not kicking any client (this is what
jack2 does) jack2 users probably have an SMP system, so jack RT load at
100% doesnt mean their system is unresponsive.
for UP users it might make sense to stop processing after a continous
series of timeouts, so that the user can fix things up.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> there are really 3 possible policies:
>
> 1) ignore all client behaviour (jack2)
> 2) try to zombify the misbehaving client(s) (jack1)
> 3) stop running the process() cycle if there is misbehaviour, and
> restart whenever
> the graph is rechained (indicating that a client has been removed, or
> added, or connections where changed)
>
> torben has been experimenting with an improved version of (2) and with (3)
my argumentation is that if i make the rules for (2) less agressive,
jack might not act up when you overload the cpu.
so i would basically like to protect the user by implementing (3)
after testing the overload situation i think the noise is not so bad.
and i would probably prefer this over silence, if i was on stage.
but UP people might want their cpu freed so they can fix the situation
quickly.
> _______________________________________________
> Jack-Devel mailing list
> Jack-Devel(a)lists.jackaudio.org
> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
--
torben Hohn
Y-ellow Paul 'n' all.
At 08:36 PM 11/22/2010 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Batz <batzman-lau(a)all-electric.com> wrote:
>
> > Damn shame that. Some nice DSP power sitting there and pretty much useless.
>
>that's true. except that my 6 core 3.2GHz AMD + mobo + 8GB of RAM cost
>me about US$650, and has more DSP power than probably any of the
>original Creamware cards. and rather than run "on linux", it can
>actually run linux. manage it with cpusets and SCHED_FIFO and you've
>more bang for the buck than the creamware stuff, i think.
That's a pretty fair point. I hadn't really thought of it from that angle.
Many years ago I was involved in designing a DSP sound card with the rather
futuristic title of infoPAD. (I'm sure Mr. Jobs would disapprove.) Of the 6
DSP96Ks we were using, (in devel) there was an OS bottleneck. It virtually
took the power of one of the DSPs to manage the other 5. Spread over all 6
DSPs but such was the OS overhead. So in theory now, with 6 cores, each
with it's own number cruncher, and it's own main processor, it should
actually manage the number crunching much more frugally. Although in
reality the OS overhead would be much greater. Since it is largely a
general purpose OS. Then again, 6 cores are 6 cores. We didn't have that
advantage. Best we could muster was an MCS51 as an arbitrator. We didn't
even have the luxury of ATMEL MCS51s back then. And of course, even DSP96Ks
seem rather quaint by today's standards.
And you make a good point for me at this time. As I'm still struggling with
defining what hardware to build this project upon.
Thanks again for that. Much appreciated.
Be absolutely icebox.
_ __ _
| "_ \ | | batzman-lau(a)all-electric.com
| |_)/ __ _| |_ ____ _-_|\
| _ \ / _` | __|___ | / \
| |_) | (_| | |_ / / \_.-*_/
|_,__/ \__,_|\__|/ / v
/ ,__
Goodfortune |_____| http://all-electric.com
Y-ellow Paul 'n' all.
At 06:59 PM 11/22/2010 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
>I met with Creamware more than 10 years ago to discuss this. They were
>very unenthusiastic about a Linux driver even though I was offering to
>do it for free. Unless someone has managed to reverse any aspect of
>these very nice devices, I suspect there is little chance of there
>ever being a linux driver, and I doubt that anyone has. I've been
>wrong before though.
Thanks for that. This is pretty much how I had read it. From what I was
reading, this is in no small part as to why creamware failed. Although
apparently the new crew at Sonic Core are more obliging, -since they're
trying to capture the OSX market- they still haven't paid much more than
lip service to this.
Damn shame that. Some nice DSP power sitting there and pretty much useless.
Thanks once again.
Be absolutely icebox.
_ __ _
| "_ \ | | batzman-lau(a)all-electric.com
| |_)/ __ _| |_ ____ _-_|\
| _ \ / _` | __|___ | / \
| |_) | (_| | |_ / / \_.-*_/
|_,__/ \__,_|\__|/ / v
/ ,__
Goodfortune |_____| http://all-electric.com