Hi
guitarix user "funkmuscle" points me to some high quality IR-files,
witch can be used with guitarix or Rakarrack for example, to emulate a
nice Marshal sound. I'm really impressed by the quality of this files.
Redwirez gives away for free a set of the Marshall 1960A, only a
Registration is needed.
http://www.redwirez.com/free1960g12m25s.jsp
greats hermann
Hi all fellow Gentoo audio users!
I have made a Gentoo overlay consisting mainly of csound-related programs:
csound frontends AlgoScore, athenaCL, cabel, smasher, QuteCsound and cecilia are
all there, as is csound-5.12.1 itself (well, cecilia isn't really working ...yet
:P ).
Please see here: http://diesel.punk.dy.fi/viewgit/ (overlay installation
instructions are here:
http://diesel.punk.dy.fi/viewgit/?a=viewblob&p=Csound-Wii&h=5df91e31a931b0b…
Enjoy!
Jouni Rinne
--
| me@home ~$whoami ^ ^ | "Trust me, I know what I'm doing!" |
| Jouni 'Mad Max' Rinne ('x') | - Sledge Hammer |
| me@home ~$man woman C " " | -------[ph34r t3h p3Ngu1n]-------- |
| Segmentation fault (core dumped) | :: Last.fm user ID: l33tmmx :: |
I have stabilized and accelerated things a lot with clocksource=hpet on
the kernel line; but I am wondering if I could get rid of my very very
few remaining xruns with "-c hpet" in the jackd command line. Only
thing is, jackd is reporting hpet as unsupported / not implemented.
Thoughts, anyone?
J.E.B.
CPU frequency tuning facilities common in other distros, generally
around the keyword “cpufreq”, weren’t working in Fedora 13. The
‘performance’ modules simply were not there in the standard Fedora
kernels, though a few others were; but even those were not willing to
run. I found this document:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/pdf/Powe…
which led to a very different method. I don’t know some of the details;
especially, I don’t know whether it actually uses the cpufreq bits which
are still there in stock kernels. But it appears to serve the same
function and much better, when checking parameters for CPU, hard drive,
and (of course) jackd usage percentage, the advantage was glaring. The
command line I used (from root) is:
tuned-adm profile latency-performance
Shockingly, and most happily, this setting stays put through a reboot,
it simply sets a large number of lower-level items to modes for minimum
latency and maximum related performance. My jackd percent-usage at rest
went from 4% to 0.4%; with all apps fired up, from 15% to 10%.
J.E.B.
Hello everyone!
I was wondering: Since I had some troubles of late with my jack1, I'd like
to instal jack2. But: Are they API and binary compatible? So would I have to
rebuild all my JACK apps or will it still work?
Kindly yours
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
Hey guys!
Had choppy sound in Virtual Box. Read somewhere on forums that the solution
is to install libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio. Did that (it uninstalled
libsdl1.2debian-alsa). It did not help the chopping issue, plus sound from
firefox disappeared. The rest of the sound seems fine.
Okay, uninstalled libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio, installed alsa package back.
However, sound to firefox did not return. Can anyone please help?
--
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/
Hello,
My question is in the subject: Do the use of 2 units linked decrease the
DSP load?
I'm currently using a Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 with FFADO 2.1 and
jackdmp on a Core2Quad Q6600 processed machine with 8 Gb RAM.
The setup I use loads the DSP at 65%.
If I add a new Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, chained to the first one, will
the DSP load decrease?
*Discussion you may not want to read*
I'm at a point where I must increase the performance of my machine, as I
will pass from 8 analog ins and 10 analog outs to 24 ins and 8 outs.
I've tried my current setup (same softs, same machine) with a RME HDSP
9652, and came to a DSP load of 35%.
I now have two options:
1. buy a RME HDSP 9652, use my Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 as a 8-Pres unit
coming through ADAT to the RME, and buy 2 more Octopre or Saffire Pro
40.
+ : DSP load is lower
+ : RME clock is better than the Focusrite one
+ : use of a PCI device => no use of FireWire, less cables, use of
stable drivers (already packaged in Debian)
- : more expensive (about 1250 €)
- : this setup is limited to 24 analog ins, and cannot be raised
easily[1]
2. buy another Saffire Pro 40, linked to the first one, and then buying
only one OctoPre.
+ : cheaper (about 850 €)
+ : this setup can be easily upgraded to a 32 analog ins[1]
+ : more outs and more S/PDIF ins
+/- ? : DSP load decreased with link of the unit?
- : DSP load for one unit is higher
[1] One of my jobs is to make live sounds, and with such a system, I'm
able to replace a analog mixer for FOH, coming to a solution looking
like LS-9 (with better pres) and other digital mixers.
Last but not least, last time I wondered about the use of DSP in
GNU/Linux, I finally understood that the DSP of audio interfaces weren't
use under GNU/Linux.
Am I wrong?
Is it always true?
If yes, how does it come that for a very same PC/software setup the RME
(PCI, so alsa driver) DSP load is twice lower than the Focusrite
(FireWire so FFADO) one?
Thanks a lot.
--
Aurélien
A new Early Music CD has been produced using FLOSS on Linux, mainly Ardour:
Sound out my voice - Italian madrigals and bastarda music for viol consort
The CD is played by the viol [1] consort "ORLANDOviols". It is
available via http://www.orlandoviols.de/.
A video, more or less the making of the CD, is on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUx_UIcht2Y
The video is completely made with Blender on Linux.
Thanks to all the creative people around the Linux Audio World!
Giso
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viol