Hi friends,
I have a weird crackling sound (it happens sometines, but often)
it is no xruns.
I am using archlinux->jack->rtirq->presonus 1818VSL=>MIDI keyboard
it happens when i hold long tones with Zynaddsubfx or bristol.
Do you have an idea what it could be ?
thanks.
fero.
Hi,
I am sorry for a beginner question, but your advice would be helpful..
I have an electronic saxophone, Yamaha WX5.
I use with MIDI->USB, using Qsynth (through jack), the sound is working
well, but every time I try to record midi footage, using either rosegarden
or ardour3, the midi record is:
- in strange tones (the melody is there, but notes are transposed for +32
or -32) (note that using Qsynth, or connecting with virtual keyboard, the
notes are ok...)
- when I try to transpose the recorded melody to normal scale, it doesn't
play anything (yes, I map some midi instrument there, but it seems like if
there is some strange volume=0 was set, or I don't know - but I haven't
found a way to set it to other values)
I know it is very messy question. But maybe you know what is wrong in my
case.. maybe to try another software, or I miss some settings there?
Thank you very much.
Milan
Hi :)
on my machine 3.10.6-rt3 and 3.10.9-rt5 x86_64 don't work properly.
Linux 3.10.9 doesn't cause issues. The last kernel-rt I used before the
3.10-rt kernels was 3.8.13-rt14, not used for audio production, but for
daily desktop usage without issues.
When running 3.10.9-rt5 even a terminal can't be opened anymore.
Xfce-terminal and xterm open without a prompt, Ctrl+Alt+F-keys don't
work. A shutdown does start delayed and then takes an hour without
completely finishing.
Does a 3.10-rt kernel work for someone on x86_64 architecture without
issues? The mobo is an ASUS M2A-VM HDMI with an AMD Athlon dual-core 2.1
GHz, BE-2350 and 4 GiB RAM.
Only tested with Arch Linux, perhaps I should test linux-3.10-rt on
Ubuntu Studio too, not done until now, because building takes around two
hours.
Regards,
Ralf
On 09/03/2013 12:13 PM, Rusty Perez wrote:
> Very interesting, I was most intrigued by the second half or so the
> sound seemed to sortof shif, and sortof surround me.
> What was I listening to?
> What is this waveguide business? :-)
>
> Thanks!
> Rusty
Hi Rusty,
Right, the second half is a filtered version of the first half.
You can learn something about waveguides here :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_waveguide_synthesis
I confess that the maths are beyond me, my evaluation of the filter is
empirical, i.e. I use my ears.
Best,
dp
>
>
> On 9/3/13, Dave Phillips <dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com> wrote:
>> On 09/03/2013 07:01 AM, Julien Claassen wrote:
>>> Hello Dave!
>>> I like it. Atmospheric. It appears simple enough, but it touches a
>>> nerve somewhere. First a feeling of being with one's self, starting of
>>> almost fearful or menacing. then the opening to the outside world, the
>>> cosmos mayhap, and the impression of width, of room and an uncertainly
>>> lightness. Weightlessness, which can be everything. Always changing
>>> subtlely. Nice little demo! I enjoyed that.
>> Thanks, Julien, as always I appreciate your ears and commentary. FYI,
>> the demo is the first movement of a "sinfonia" I'm writing. So far I'm
>> not impressed with anything I've composed for it, but I do like what the
>> waveguide does to that one movement. It's likely to engender an entirely
>> different piece. You know how that goes. :)
>>
>>> Warm regards
>>> Julien
>> Best always to you too,
>>
>> dp
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>> Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>>
Hi :)
since Wiki mentions that the "Matrix-6R and Matrix-1000 are both
rackmount versions of the Matrix-6" and I'm writing a command line tool
for editing the Matrix-1000, I wonder if sysex remote parameter edit
parameters and values are equal for all three synths?
At least the device ID for all three synths is the same, 06 hex.
If there should be minor differences for parameters and/or values I
could add a Matrix-6 and Matrix-R6 mode.
I also wonder if regarding to the MIDI implementation different versions
of the Matrix-1000 were released.
AFAIK there are no different versions off the Matrix-1000 regarding to
the MIDI implementation and sysex remote parameter edit parameters and
values are equal for Matrix-1000, Matrix-6 and Matrix-6R.
Is anybody aware about differences?
Regards,
Ralf
Linux-friends,i hope you can help me soon with the find of my desperate
long-time wish.
I include here my letter in a HTML-code, because at first i mailed this
letter to the wrong adress, so to get rid of all the headers on the Gmail,
i found an app (BasKet Note Pads, Ubuntu)that can do that, but till now iḿ
not able to get the entire visible text at-ones pasted into the writable
Gmailbox-space, then till now i ownly know this HTML-method with the BasKet
Note Pad. Wish you luck in searching your own free spaces in life and the
support to other good-harted people in this rude world. And thank you..
Jose.*
This may be of interest to anyone who has a midi foot controller which
only sends out program change messages, who also has an effects unit or SW
which can map CC to effect parameters/bypass/etc, and who has a desire to use
the foot switches like a regular 'stomp box chain' for *TOGGLED* control of
individual effects.
MusE's "Midi Input Transformator" plugin now allows you to do it.
I pushed a wee mod and some fixes to our SF git repository.
It should appear next release. The repo may change soon.
Here's an example setup which maps Program Changes 0 - 3 to
CC num = (Program + 10) and CC val = (TOGGLE 0 / 127):
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53315356/Patch2ToggledCCTransform.jpeg
The neat thing is, you can KEEP program changes that are above a certain
number (Program 4 and above in the example), so that the very same foot
controller can be used to change patches AND control individual effects.
Common foot controllers have four Program switches and two Bank up/down
switches, so by going to the next Bank (Programs 4 - 7 in the example),
it can be used to switch Programs, then go back to Bank 0 (Programs 0 -3)
and the switches act upon the individual effects again.
Note that MusE currently allows mapping midi controllers to any LADSPA
Rack Plugin parameters *except* the 'Bypass' switch.
So if MusE *itself* is to be the effects unit, properly a 'Bypass' controller
should be added.
Cheers,
Tim.
www.muse-sequencer.org/
Hi everyone!
I don't know if this should be asked in LAD, but I'm fed up with Pure
Data's own gui components, and would like to develop my own gui with
something else (GTK? QT?). I don't have earlier experience with any UI
toolkit, so I don't have any favourites. What is easiest approach to custom
gui development with PD?
I need something like list boxes and buttons with custom text. Nothing too
special.
Heikki
--
http://heikki.ketoharju.info/en/ <http://heikki.ketoharju.info>