Hi List!
I'm looking for a card meeting the following requirements:
0) *Linux supported* :)
1) It has AES/EBU channels (4 as minimum)
2) 192 kHz / 24-bit Single-wire and Dual-wire Modes
3) External synchronisation Master Clock or Word Clock
4) Ability to acquire data without any further on-card processing
The main purpose is to connect this card to dCS converters (which have
only AES/ABU)
It's something like Lynx AES16 (http://www.lynxstudio.com/aes16.html)
but alsa soundcard matrix shows that it's not supported...
I know that HammerFall DSP MultiFace has theoretically AES/EBU but I
think it's just S/PDIF - has too low signal level and doesn't work with
our dCS convertes at rates >=96kHz.
any help greatly appreciated :)
best regards,
Michal Kostrzewa
Thank's for all your answers ; unfortunately, I've not succeded until
now .....
But I've not a lot of time left to spend now...perhaps later...so I fear
that i must reconnect my atari falcon with cubase audio : great problem
to print correct scores with the actuals printers, but no trouble in use !!!
cordialement,
PS : I think it would be great to get a cd with all stuffs nneeded, to
make a linux midi station work properly ; with my poor rtc net
connection, it's too diffcult
>From BrbrOfSvl(a)aol.com on Friday, 2004-01-09 at 01:11:49 -0500:
>
> In a message dated 1/8/04 5:32:16 PM,
> linux-audio-user-request(a)music.columbia.edu writes:
>
>
> > But if I had to choose a musical education tool for teachers
> > and young people, might I not be better off with a midi
> > program such as muse or rosegarden4?
> >
> > What would be the advantage of csound/cecilia?
> >
> >
>
> You will not find better software than Csound for making people actually
> think about the nature of sound. I learned more about acoustics/psychoacoustics
> working with csound than I did in any class on the subject (not a knock on my
> teachers, however, who have been great). Its small size and enormous
> versatility, with the addition of a score-making front-end like score11 or ngen,
I had not heard of these programs before. Thanks for the tip!
> could prove an extremely valuable application for advanced students who want to
> know what's actually going into the sound they are producing. I don't like
> cecilia at all - though it does make some things (particularly granular
> synthesis) somewhat easier. I feel the great versatility of csound lies in its
> absence of an encumbering GUI. I also am not fond of midi, but I guess it's
> unavoidable.
Trouble is, my target audience will collapse in a heap without a GUI!
> I would not include Ardour unless you want to include other Jack clients.
> Ardour is buggy (though the newest release is better), and it can be a real
> pain to use. I really like Rezound, but it can be a little buggy (particularly
Ardour is out, according to everything I have heard until now.
> if you are using it as a jack client). Jack is good if you have a soundcard
> that will only talk to one program at a time, and you need to do several
> things at once - with jack you can run Ardour's output into freqtweak, and send its
> output into rezound for recording on the fly. Depends on what you want to
> be able to do with this stuff. Another decent program you might check out is
> Pure Data (or PD) - great for realtime applications if you're into that.
Another application I know nothing about. I will look it up.
Thanks for your comments and suggestions.
Conrad
Based on the fact that the following line is the second last displayed
by dmsg, I presume my intel i810 is set to a sample rate of 48000:
intel8x0: clocking to 48000
I also presume this is not optimal and should be changed to 44100,
right? Where is this done?
I run debian/unstable on both 2.4.23-low-latency-patched and 2.6.0/1
kernels with the latest alsa on 2.4 and the build in alsa in 2.6. Please
bear with me, but I don't really know which config files to post....
Thanks in advance.
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
http://www.atte.dk
Hi all,
here's a work in progress collection of the state of affairs in
RRADical Pd as I propose it.
http://footils.org/pkg/rradical-wip-040109.tgz
This includes a new and improved version of the pattern sequencer
rrad.pattseq and memento and lots of more abstractions for
reuseability enhancements in Pd.
Impressive Screenshot of a use case is here:
http://footils.org/images/rradical-wip.png
Extensive documentation is missing. :(
I'll regularily announce updates to my wip-collection here:
http://footils.org/cms/pydiddy/wiki/RradicalPd
Linux-audio-user is CC'd because maybe this is interesting to, well,
Linux audio users, too, I guess.
== What is RRADical Pd? ==
One goal of RRADicalPd? is to create a collection of patches, that
make Pd easier and faster to use for people who are more comfortable
with software like Reason or Reaktor. RRADical ships with patches,
that solve real-world problems on a higher level of abstraction than
the standard Pd objects do. All these high level abstractions
(should) come with (detachable and changable) GUIs built in and use a
common way of saving states. They also include a net remote control
using OSC.
RRAD as an acronym stands for "Reusable and Rapid Application/Audio
Development" with Pd.
The official home of RRADical Pd is:
http://pure-data.org/community/projects/rradical/
Have fun,
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
Greetings:
Linux Journal On-line has published the latest edition of my monthly column :
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7342&mode=thread&order=0
It's about living on Planet CCRMA and visiting my Aunt AGNULA...
On-line since yesterday morning, currently at 3330 reads...
Best,
== dp
On the 3-D audio (Interest in Software?) thread, I had promised to mail
out something on a plug-in. It got a little too long, so rather than
clog up everyone's mailbox, I went ahead and put it in:
http://home.earthlink.net/~davidrclark/linux_audio_users/Plug-in.html
If this isn't proper nettiquette for this user's mailing list, someone
please do let me know. It would be easier just to email my ramblings.
---------------------
Bottom line is: I'm not sure if it makes sense as a plug-in or not.
I think I may provide the impulse response function generator and my
own convolution engine, then let one of the plug-in gurus see what they
can do, if they want to. If nothing happens, it'll be a command-line
thingy until I get motivated to GUI it all up.
No schedule, but I'd be happy to provide a crude tarball to anyone who
wants to try and deal with it at any time. I PROMISE it won't be easy
without some instruction. Please email me privately also so that I'm
sure to see it.
Thanks,
Dave.
Does anyone know how to get a Midiman Quattro to work with suse 9.0? I
did have outputs working at one time, but never figured out the input
channels. Ther is reference to a .asound file, but not in Suse9.0
Dave
Brian Redfern wrote:
> Soundhack does some of this...
I just took a look at the Soundhack page and the documentation for the
binaural module. From the available documentation, it appears that
Soundhack merely uses impulse response functions that are alreay
generated, specifically that the binaural filter uses the HRTF's from
Durand R. Begault. Has something changed recently? Soundhack now
generates HTRF's or solutions to the wave equation?
The documentation also says that you can add reverb to the results. Ugh.
No, that isn't what one really wants to do for 3-D. It should all be
a consistent solution to the wave equation for a particular boundary
and source/sink locations, or a close approximation of it.