> From: dwillis(a)stx.rr.com [mailto:dwillis@stx.rr.com]
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, iriXx wrote:
>
> > you will have a certain element of copyright in your mechanical
> > recording of the piano, but the copyright in the sample still belongs to
> > korg/roland/yamaha etc, who are likely to be quite protective of them.
>
> then, wouldn't they mention it somewhere? especially on a new piece of
> equipment considering all the software and dvd issues these days?
> my microKORG manual, and the unit itself, says nothing. only the manual
> itself has a copyright. i don't remember any restrictions on my sy85,
> either (but it's in the states, and i'm in korea).
The idea of copyrighting a single note strikes me as a bit strange.
Maybe it applies to the library as a whole?
{I've no idea.}
> From: Greg Reddin [mailto:gtreddin@yahoo.com]
> So it might not ever be palatable to the masses because it's too
> innovative. It's the same reason why Creed will always sell more
> tickets than Dream Theater, but I will always listen to DT more than
> I will Creed. Creativity vs. following trends. Have I totally
> missed the point?
>
> OTOH, the tools, like the music needs to be commercially viable, at
> least for those who choose to make their living off of it. And I
> think it could be and someday will be. It would be a shame for all
> this cool innovation to only be accessible to programmers --
> especially since many of the developers are going out of their way to
> make it accessible to non-programmers.
Music hasn't always had to be formula to make it. The 'net's made major changes in the public's tastes in the past decade or so {at it was until it got "bought".}
It's not that hard to imagine a future that enables non pop music.
{I'm not sure that "commercial" requires "Pro-Tools" anyway.}
Hi,
Windows Media Player doesn't handle ogg files. Is there a Windows app
that would allow my to listen to ogg files?
(That other hijacked thread has an ogg link, but I couldn't bear to
hijack the thread in yet another direction!) ;-)
Thanks,
Mark
Hi all,
Short question:
I'm thinking of moving up to Sarge from Woody. I know DeMuDi works with Sid.
Does anyone know anything about testing (sarge) that would break the DeMuDi
packages?
TIA
tim hall
Hi all,
With the profusion of good, legal, lossless, and free .flac files
floating around the net, I was looking for a good way to burn sets of
them to CD. The only burner I have on my system at the moment is
GnomeToaster, so I set about doing it. I hear that Arson for KDE can do
it, and maybe K3B can to. I have a feeling that if I set my mind to it
I could write a script to do this, but Gnometoaster is pretty nice.
Perhaps more industrious folks will use the ideas to do on the fly DAO
in other burners.
The instructions are here:
http://nutation.net/blog/2003/10/14#flac2cd
If those instructions work for you, you should be creating gapless CDs
from FLACs in addition to whatever other audio files you have in an easy
manner.
Feel free to respond to me and/or the list if you have any questions.
-Rich
Has anyone done any comparisions in terms of realtime performance of any
of the softsynths.
I was interested in seeing results of the following or possibley other synths compared:
csound
pd
sfront
I was curious how well sfront performs because you can optimise that for
your instruments to your processor. It seems rather interesting that the
instruments get translated into c code that you then later compile with
gcc. I know pd probably has a faster developement time similar to
writing something in perl but is the execution performance the same as
say sfront or csound? What has better performance for real time stuff
csound or sfront?
Thanks,
Jeremiah
Hi there,
I am looking for a way to improve the sound from an old VHS tape.
The tape has been played an played and played.... the osund has now some
fluctuations that I'd like to get rid of.
I know how to use SOX, GWC or Audacity but do not have the knowledge about
sound processing. Bcast 2000 seems to have useful tools as well, but really
it's above what I know (apart from gain and LPF).
So if anybody has a link, an idea, a trick, anything will do at this stage :-)
Thanks a lot
Edouard
Hi all,
someone know this error:
# modprobe snd-es1938
/lib/modules/2.4.20-20.9/kernel/sound/pci/snd-es1938.o: init_module: No
such device
Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters,
including invalid IO or IRQ parameters.
You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg
/lib/modules/2.4.20-20.9/kernel/sound/pci/snd-es1938.o: insmod
/lib/modules/2.4.20-20.9/kernel/sound/pci/snd-es1938.o
failed/lib/modules/2.4.20-20.9/kernel/sound/pci/snd-es1938.o: insmod
snd-es1938 failed
Please can you have some suggestions ?
My system have RedHat 9.0 with kernel 2.4.20-20.9
and the soundcard is ESS1969
Many thanks,
--
Davide Morano
Q-Lab Team
Wind Telecomunicazioni
Davide.Morano(a)mail.wind.it
http://wwww.libero.it
Does anyone on this list have an Echo card installed in their machine?
(Gina, Darla, Mia, etc...)
If so, could you email me the output of lspci -v please?
It would be greatly appreciated.
Austin
--
Austin Acton
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assistant, Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Chemistry, York University, Toronto
MandrakeLinux Volunteer Developer, homepage: www.groundstate.ca
Yes, I would say that is a latency issue. On the other hand, since Ardour is multi-threaded, the GUI degrades gracefully. So it might have started recording even though the record button hasn't popped back.
Taybin
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Trumm <aaron(a)nquit.com>
Sent: Oct 6, 2003 9:16 PM
To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
Subject: [linux-audio-user] recording delay in Ardour...
hello - I think this is a simple question - right now when I record into
ardour, there's dang near a half second delay before it actually spits it
back out - that delay is reflected in the recording, too - I didn't THINK
this was happening yesterday...
is this a latency thing? I know I haven't maximized my latency, I'm running
the redhat kernel from planet ccrma, not the actual planet ccrma kernel and
when I check to see if low latency is turned on, I find that I don't even
have a low latency patch :)
the weird thing is I SWEAR is wasn't happening yesterday :)
--
--------------
Aaron Trumm
NQuit
www.nquit.com
--------------