From: Dave Phillips <dlphilp(a)bright.net>
>
> "Kjetil S. Matheussen" wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps Kjetil can provide a working example ?
> > >
> >
> > The help2-k_vst~.pd patch in the k_vst~ tar file works for me. (last time
> > I tried at least). Press the "click to hear" button.
>
> Thanks, Kjetil. I got the mda_JX10 synth and tested the patch, it worked
> fine (but no GUI, alas). I also tried the compakt and Barking Wombat
> synths again with that example, both worked fine and both showed their
> GUIs (after I added the opengui/closegui messages to the patch).
> However, I still haven't figured out how to sound the patch via my MIDI
> keyboard.
>
> The vstserver is still very shaky. It often crashes after changing the
> DLL name in the k_vst~ object. I can start the whole thing again with
> the revised patch and it will work fine (until I try changing the DLL
> again). Btw, I built and installed your version of WINE (from the NoTAM
> site) and rebuilt the vstserver.
>
It seems like the newer wine-versions doesnt work quite as well with
the vstserver as the nov-dec2002 versions. I have experienced more
strange behaviour after upgrading too. But it might be coincidental.
> I tried utilizing the MIDI input components from the audio/MIDI test
> patch but even though it shows MIDI data coming from my keyboard I'm
> still not sounding the VSTi plugin. Suggestions ?
>
Hmm, no. I'm unfortunately not sitting at a linux machine right now.
Cant think of anything. Ask the pd-list perhaps? There seems to
be quite many that use the k_vst~ external on that list.
--
> > Also, do any VSTi's work with vstserver?
>
Yes. There are very few differences between the
VSTi and the VST format.
> according to the pd k_vst~ readme, pd supports
> midi note on/off, controllers, pitchbend, aftertouch, and
> program change for vsti's!
>
Thats right.
> i cant personally verify that :-)
>
I can. :)
> From: Dave Phillips <dlphilp(a)bright.net>
> To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Running vstserver & ladspavst
> Reply-To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
>
> Tim Orford wrote:
>
> > > Also, do any VSTi's work with vstserver?
> >
> > according to the pd k_vst~ readme, pd supports
> > midi note on/off, controllers, pitchbend, aftertouch, and
> > program change for vsti's!
> >
> > i cant personally verify that :-)
>
> I tried running the Barking Wombat and the compakt synths with k_vst~.
> Both GUIs popped up without complaint, but neither worked. Furthermore,
> when I quit Pd (after closing the synths) the vstserver crashes (with
> each synth tested).
>
> Perhaps Kjetil can provide a working example ?
>
The help2-k_vst~.pd patch in the k_vst~ tar file works for me. (last time
I tried at least). Press the "click to hear" button.
--
What's your soundcard? I think being able to open a sound device multiple times is dependent on if the hardware supports that. I can run jack and xmms (without the jack plugin) concurrently on my sb512.
Taybin
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Phillips <dlphilp(a)bright.net>
Sent: Sep 18, 2003 7:54 AM
To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] JACK splat
Robert Jonsson wrote:
> Thursday 18 September 2003 14:19 skrev Dave Phillips:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > I'm having an interesting problem with JACK (0.81.1). When running it
> > I can't start non-JACK apps, e.g., after starting JACK (with Rui's neat
> > qjackctl) I'm unable to open Snd until I stop JACK. Is this expected
> > behavior ? I hope not...
>
> Are you sure you could do it with other versions of Jack?
Now that I think about it, no, I'm not sure about that. I've usually
reserved JACK use for Ardour, so I might not have ever tried running a
non-JACK app with the server open.
> I don't know how Snd works, but it seems probable that it opens the
> sound-device on startup. And if it is occupied by a sound-server, any
> sound-server, the app may not start.
I'm pretty sure Snd operates in just that manner, and I understand what
you're telling me. I also tried opening it with jacklaunch but got no
joy. :(
Best regards,
== Dave Phillips
The Book Of Linux Music & Sound at http://www.nostarch.com/lms.htm
The Linux Soundapps Site at http://linux-sound.org
Greetings:
Is anyone on this last using CheeseTracker 0.8.0 ? I like it, but I've
run into a number of problems. I've already mentioned some bugs to reduz
and I'll prepare a better report for him. But meanwhile I wondered if
anyone else here is even using it.
Best regards,
== Dave Phillips
The Book Of Linux Music & Sound at http://www.nostarch.com/lms.htm
The Linux Soundapps Site at http://linux-sound.org
As far as I know, the paint feature is still in there. I don't know if it still works though. There are a lot of features, and we might not know if something is broken until someone tries it out.
Taybin
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Knecht <mknecht(a)controlnet.com>
Sent: Sep 17, 2003 11:37 AM
To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [linux-audio-user] Loops
>
> Why is this difficult? Are you looking for something like fruity
> loops that
> makes it easy to assemble the loops themselves? What sort of
> functionality
> are you wanting?
>
Check the Ardour archives. We had this discussion back around last January.
Actually, someone did a patch for Ardour that painted loops much like Acid
does. You placed the loop where you wanted it to start and then did a drag
to the right. If you went farther than the length of the loop then Ardour
put in a second copy of the loop, just like Acid.
Ardour was actually sort of nicer than Acid in that you could put multiple
loops on the same track. Acid doesn't allow that.
I think that none of this eventually made it into CVS, but I could be wrong.
maybe the functionality is there somewhere. (I don't use Ardour.)
- Mark
Hi
Thanks for getting my son hooked on audacity, but now I am getting more
questions. I have audacity-1.2 now and I like the feature (esp looping). I
can import a MIDI file but then cannot play it. I do not see any setting
for MIDI out on the preferences. I get a device not found error when I
play a midi track. Am I missing anything.
Thanks
Hi Atte,
I've used Csound alot in the past too. Mostly command line from Common Music which I like alot. I'm trying to go more real-time though now. I just decided I would try and get into PD!
How is your orchestra set-up. Do you have 1 synth per instrument per channel? I always had a hard time in Csound as I wanted to have 1 synth per 16 channels and have them all have their own set of presets. PD supports multiple midi ports so I thought that would probably work, though learning another language will be tough as I know Csound well. I also want the graphic routines, and as you know Csound dosen't have the Opengl stuff in Linux, (yet). I also don't understand the status of Csound right now. Is anyone actually working on coding Csound5? I'm on the lists but can't tell.
Thanks,
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: Atte Andr? Jensen <atte(a)ballbreaker.dk>
Sent: Sep 15, 2003 8:47 AM
To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Linux synths
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 07:44:23 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
Ken Locarnini <renueden(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> I'm happy to be back after about 2 years away from Linux. The
> audio/music world seems to be taking off and thats great.
Indeed!
> I'd like some general comments on what would be peoples favorite
> reactor type synth in Linux as of now. I'm primarily interested in
> realtime, multi timbral midi controlled synths.
I simply love csound. It's flexible, powerful, stable and well
documented. I know that some (most?) people find the fact that it's text
based a minus, but I don't agree. After working with pd intensely for a
couple of weeks I realized that I work much faster in csound.
I'm running csound under debian/unstable on kernel 2.6.0-test5 with a
csound buffersize of 128 on a PIV 2400 laptop, using Evolution USB
keyboards as controllers. I have more polyphony in real time than I can
use with two hands for "normal" (subtractive, fm, sample playback,
soundfont playback, additive) patches. This is even with a few global FX
units (chorus, delay and rotary speaker) running all the time.
The only not-so-nice thing about csound is that I didn't manage (or try
that hard, actually) to make it run alongside other sound-producing
applications, including jack, pd or fluidsynth. Could be a problem if
you want to use LADSPA plugins or do hd-recording...
> How about sequencers?
I didn't work much with sequencers under linux, but FWIW I've settled on
Muse. Needless to say it's quite simple to route midi events from Muse
to csound.
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
I'm happy to be back after about 2 years away from Linux. The audio/music world seems to be taking off and thats great. I'd like some general comments on what would be peoples favorite reactor type synth in Linux as of now. I'm primarily interested in realtime, multi timbral midi controlled synths. How about sequencers? Thanks for any advice,
Ken