On 10 February 2014 06:51, Matt Garman <matthew.garman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure, no problem. What I have is:
> (1) Linux server with a media collection in a basement network closet
> (2) A powered subwoofer on the main floor, with only a single coax
> run between the sub and network closet in the basement
> (3) In-ceiling speakers on the main floor, all wires terminating
> in same network closet
Are the in-ceiling speakers connected in pairs?
If they are then you need 3 channels, L,R,M. where M = L+R.
If you have a soundcard with at least 3 channels and insist on using
alsa output then you can use
http://alsa.opensrc.org/Low-pass_filter_for_subwoofer_channel_%28HOWTO%29
to upmix from 2 channels to 3 channels in ALSA. (you can ignore the
part about low pass).
Or you could instead use the jack mpd output plugins and just connect
the channels
like
MPD_out_L -> HW_L
-> HW_M
MPD_out_R -> HW_R
-> HW_M
There is also jackminimix for a OSC controlled mixer.
I think ecasound can also be used for that purpose.
> Note that in this solution, I'm sending the full-range signal to both
> the in-ceiling speakers and the sub. The sub has a builtin crossover,
> and the speakers can handle the full signal.
>
> As a side note, if you read the AudioCircle thread above, you'll see I
> already have an AVR that can send a bass signal over coax... my goal
> is to get rid of the AVR though, as I have more speakers than it has
> outputs (would rather not use the AVR and speaker selector), plus I
> want to move control off the AVR and onto the Linux server (mpd).
Now this is where I lost you, how many speakers do you have exactly,
and how many amps for them? Doesn't it mean that you need as many amps
for each speakers you have if you ditch the speaker selector?
If indeed you want to control it like that then you also need a soundcard
with as many output channels as the number of power amps channels for
the speakers.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org>
Subject: Re: [LAU] Bitwig at long last...?
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:19:21 +0100
Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 16:54 +0100, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 04:27 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Aaargh, I own a nice single coil Ibanez guitar, but I love to play the
> > SG's of friends :). The fingerboard of a SG is close to a classical
> > guitar, the mechanics are bad, but the "rest" is amazing. It's my
> > favourite guitar, just because I grow up as a musician by imitating
> > Jimi, I bought this single coil Ibanez. Today I would buy a SG :).
>
> As the owner of a 1970 SG I can say that the fingerboard doesn't feel at
> all like the one from a classical guitar. Also the mechanics of my SG
> are in pretty good shape for a guitar of 44 years old. Just to make
> clear that not every SG has the same fingerboard or bad mechanics. And
> then I'm not talking about how different they can sound. My SG has P90's
> but I've owned one with humbuckers too which sounded completely
> different. And then I almost forget the player. Robby Krieger sounds
> completely different than say Tony Iommi or Angus Young.
> On-topic, I think the same way about DAW's. I consider generalizing a vice.
:) No comment ;), no, a comment, I suspect you're aware about what I'm
talking about ;). The fingerboard is more like a classical guitar, than
a Stratocaster or Stratocaster alike guitar and all SG humbuckers from
different ages have a special unique sound _and_ a Schaller M6 Mini or
derivative definitively is better than an original (Conclusion or what
ever is the name) opened SG mechanic.
CV is different than MIDI.
Atte <atte(a)youmail.dk> wrote:
>On 02/09/2014 04:31 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> How would the VST spec allow for control voltage?
>>
>> (hint: it won't)
>
>Not sure what you're talking about.
>
>AMS when ran standalone is (in my setup) controlled by midi. That's what
>I thought might be possible with AMS as VST. But if you say so...
>
>--
>Atte
>
>http://atte.dkhttp://modlys.dk
>_______________________________________________
>Linux-audio-user mailing list
>Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
>http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Which of the suggested option is the one people here on the list favour?
http://jackaudio.org/pulseaudio_and_jack
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlL1L3UACgkQ3EB7kzgMM6Ln1ACfVyT8RXVcBzHiIkyQJU9LWBWK
4p4Anj08pRcsv5ytIxvtrebWhbkQulGA
=JPXo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I have a collection of FLAC files, all ripped from my CD collection
What I would like to do is run an analysis across all the music to
determine how the bass/lower frequencies are generally mixed. For
example, how much content below (for example) 150 Hz is on the left
channel versus the right channel?
I'm not sure if "histogram" is the right word, but in my mind what
I'd like to see, per-channel, is something like this:
150--125 Hz: x samples
125--100 Hz: y samples
100--80 Hz: z samples
...
Then I can look at the two channels of a song, and if the histograms
are approximately the same, I can assume the bass was mixed equally
to both channels.
I am a programmer, and thought it would be easy to quickly hack
something up that would do this, but I have no experience with
signal processing, and as I started reading about this, I quickly
got in over my head! So I was hoping there might already exist a
tool that has this functionality.
Note that I don't need any kind of graphical output, as this needs
to be wrapped up in some kind of batch processing script---I have
about 11,000 files to analyze!
The motivation for this is: I have a hardware DAC (digital audio
converter) in one part of my house, and a subwoofer in another.
There is a single coax run between the DAC and subwoofer, so I can
only send one channel. If the overwhelming majority of my music has
the bass mixed equally, sending only one channel isn't a problem.
But if I choose the "L" channel to send to the sub, and much music
has the bass mixed only to the "R" channel, then I won't be able to
hear the low frequencies. I want to find out how often this might
happen.
Thanks,
Matt
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 09:39 -1000, david wrote:
> On 02/08/2014 04:14 AM, Brett McCoy wrote:
> > psshh... I still don't wear earplugs :-P
>
> So ... you're still in a garage band? ;-)
Garages as rehearsal room are seldom in Germany.
When I was young I played and today the kids play in world war two NAZI
bunkers in Germany.
When I was young there were posters in our rehearsal room:
"Feind hört mit denk immer dran, vertrau nicht blind dem Nebenmann!"
Disgusting, broken translation: "Take care! The enemy is always there
and listening, don't trust the person next to you!" but in German it's a
rhyme and really funny, in an idiotic kind of way.
http://createdigitalmusic.com/2014/01/bitwig-sets-date-heres-youll-get-bitw…
No LV2 or LADSPA support on Linux, though, although they say it's planned.
At least it supports Jack.
--
Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it,
it would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
Yet another FWIW, interesting and OS-HW project,
https://phonebloks.com/en/goals
Sorry, this is the last dear folks. I just thought you'd like.
Regards
--
Carlos sanchiavedraz
* Musix GNU+Linux
http://www.musix.es