Linux-audio-user

linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

3 participants
20662 discussions

by MK aka El Doctor

Hi, Well I've been working hard and new images (32 or 64bit) are ready for testing :) "io GNU/Linux is a Live DVD/USB based on the free Operating System Debian (Sid)... and includes a large collection of preinstalled programs for all uses, especially multimedia creation" This new version brings a lot of bug fixes, updated softwares and new features: (systemd, rtirq, encrypted persistence, a getting started and more)... For screenshots, package lists, infos etc... visit: -> http://manu.kebab.free.fr/iognulinux.html A small demo video is available: -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UCB5je9lJo Preparing an USB flash drive (with persistence) HowTo: -> https://sourceforge.net/p/io-gnu-linux/wiki/USB%20install%20howto Enjoy and happy weekend to all :) MK

11 years, 9 months

Re: [LAU] [Fwd: Re: Bitwig at long last...?

by Ralf Mardorf

On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 19:00 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 12:47 -0500, Brett McCoy wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Ralf Mardorf > > <ralf.mardorf(a)rocketmail.com> wrote: > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > > > > :) No comment ;), no, a comment, I suspect you're aware about what I'm > > > talking about ;). The fingerboard is more like a classical guitar, than > > > a Stratocaster or Stratocaster alike guitar and all SG humbuckers from > > > different ages have a special unique sound _and_ a Schaller M6 Mini or > > > derivative definitively is better than an original (Conclusion or what > > > ever is the name) opened SG mechanic. > > > > I have to disagree also, SG is not at all like a classical guitar, no > > more and no less than a Strat, Les Paul or Ibanez fingerboard. Why do > > you think SG fingerboard is like a classical fingerboard? The > > mechanics are probably not too different from a Les Paul's, it may > > depend on the year of year issue, too. > > Yesno ;), the SGs fingerboard is not equal, but more flat like a > fingerboard of a classical guitar. And an original LesPaul mechanics is equal to a SG's mechanics, at least for the ones I don't own, but I played owned by friends. I love my Ibanez, but it isn't as good as a Gibson, not even as good as a Fender, just the Ibanez mechanics is a little bit better, while my closed Ibanez Shaller like mechanics already is broken, but still in a better shape than the opened old original Gibson mechanics I know.

11 years, 9 months

[OT] Helium: The first supercapacitor-powered portable speaker

by Carlos sanchiavedraz

Another FWIW, interesting and OS-HW crowdfunded project: https://www.crowdsupply.com/blueshift/helium At the end of the page there are another interesting projects including some related to FX. -- Carlos sanchiavedraz * Musix GNU+Linux http://www.musix.es

11 years, 9 months

Steinberg UR22 on ArchLinux

by Dragonseel

Hello, I am owner of a Steinberg UR22 and user of ArchLinux with Kernel Version /3.12.9-2-ARCH/. I use ALSA version 1.0.27-2 Now my Linux does not recognize the UR22 as a sound device. It is recognized as a USB-Device. This is a similar situation to a older Thread. In that thread a solution was found by adding a section to a file named *quirks-table.h* but unfortunately there is no such file in ArchLinux, and apparently it is supposed do be that way. Is there an alternative way to do that fix? Or is there something else I miss? Thank you and greetings, Lukas -- View this message in context: http://linux-audio.4202.n7.nabble.com/Steinberg-UR22-on-ArchLinux-tp89280.h… Sent from the linux-audio-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 9 months

Focusrite Saffire PRO 40 at 96kHz

by José Agustín Terol Sanchis

Hello, I am thinking in set up a home studio for recording and mixing based on Linux. I have in mind to buy a Focusrite Saffire PRO 40, but first, I would like to know the experience of someone who has already used it. I've taken a look at http://www.ffado.org/?q=devicesupport/list but I don't have clear if this device can be used at 96kHz, because currently it's marked as "experimental". I know other Saffire have "full support", but nowadays are discontinued. Does anybody used it for hours (and days) at this frequency? Also, I would be interested in experiences with similar interfaces that also work fine in linux. Thank you, Agus Terol

11 years, 9 months

[OT] RedPitaya, a HW laboratory in your pocket

by Carlos sanchiavedraz

Don't know if anybody knows about this: http://www.redpitaya.com/ FWIW, Regards. -- Carlos sanchiavedraz * Musix GNU+Linux http://www.musix.es

11 years, 9 months

Album produced in Linux

by Jason Jones

Fusion between gospel and punk, this whole album was produced in Linux, using Harrison Mixbus and only Linux-native (LV2 / LADSPA) plugins. http://tinyboats.bandcamp.com/ Any thoughts or comments? --Jason www.artcitysound.com (Linux-based studio)

11 years, 9 months

[ANN] CAPS 0.9.17

by Tim Goetze

CAPS 0.9.17 =========== http://quitte.de/dsp/caps.html The latest release of CAPS, a collection of LADSPA plugins, contains two important bugfixes and minor sonic improvements. http://quitte.de/dsp/caps.html#CHANGES James Morris insisted that something was wrong with the PlateX2 stereo reverb, and indeed, it turned out that its damping parameter would not be read correctly. (This bug, it pains me to admit it, probably dates back to 0.9.0, possibly even earlier. In my defense, I only ever use the mono-to-stereo version which was not affected.) Ricardo Crudo isolated a potential segmentation fault triggered by the 'model' parameter selection of the CabinetIV plugin. Thanks guys! http://quitte.de/dsp/caps.html#Download Upgrading is recommended. Enjoy, Tim

11 years, 9 months

Re: [LAU] New album out: Modlys/2013 - workflow

by Atte

On 02/04/2014 02:42 PM, Dave Phillips wrote: > Very cool, thank you for this detailed explication. :) Some of your > methods are rather different from what I expected, you're definitely in > control of your tools, and you have fine musical sense. I'm not sure what you expected (but would like to hear it)... > I > use RubberBand for this sort of processing, though I have experimented > with paulstretch. I tested various stretching engines, and paulstretch just sounds so beautiful. Of course it's a little picky/tricky to work with, which is why I made a python wrapper script that makes it read/write all kinds of formats and makes it more pleasant to work with :-) > Best regards, and as always, thanks for the beautiful music, You're welcome, glad someone enjoys it! -- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk

11 years, 9 months

Re: [LAU] New album out: Modlys/2013 - workflow

by Atte

On 02/04/2014 02:39 PM, James Mckernon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Atte <atte(a)youmail.dk> wrote: > You use the word 'find'; do you have a large library of drum samples > you use for this? Or do you synthesize any of your own drum sounds > from scratch? And a similar question for the other instruments in your > songs - do you use softsynths, sample-based instruments, or a > combination? I have a quite large sample (flac) collection :-) atte@skagen:~/music/samples$ du -h | tail -n1 39G . Some are ancient and sampled on my roland s50 back in the day directly from vinyl that I personally hunted down in second hand record stores, most are collected from all over the internet. Others (mostly melodic non-drum instruments) are samples from the synths I have or have owned (wavestation, jv80, xp80, micron, m50) or generated with ams, zynaddsubfx or even the nativ synth in energyXT. The only synth I really use is Loomer Aspect, although I don't use it that much. The main reason why I prefer samples over synths are the "build-in" complexity with samples. To me music mostly build with synthesizers tends to lack depth. Don't get me wrong, I like Jarre and Kitaro, but I'm going for a more organic sound, my electronic heros are Squarepusher and chr15 + various underground stuff I stumble over from time to time. I really like to load a sample that might suggest a chord that I don't even know how is tuned and start messing with it by ear. I love to be surprised and get pushed to harmonies I wouldn't think of myself. >> I like to spread out the work of a track over a long time. Work a little on >> it, then leave it alone for a while and come back to it. For this purpose I >> made a renoise hackish tool that renders a track to wav from the >> commandline. > > No need to go into too much detail, but as a Renoise user, I'm curious > - roughly how did you achieve this? Something using Renoise's internal > Lua scripting? Yes, it's done in lua. Some things are hardcoded, it works in companion with a bash script. If this doesn't scare you. I can send you the stuff off-list... > I like the idea of listening to and evaluating things in another context. It's sooo important, at least for me. -- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk

11 years, 9 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-user