hi all. been lurking for a few weeks, taking it all
in. this list seems to be a pretty awesome resource,
so i'm glad to be on it.
i'm just getting my feet wet with production (been
djing for about 6 years, give or take), and while for
now most of my composition (dance-ish stuff, mostly)
will continue to happen in the unfortunate world of
xp, i'm going to be buying an extra harddrive pretty
soon here so that i can start dual booting into linux
for mastering and for recording my friends live, which
i'm very eager to begin doing.
my question is this: is debian (demudi) a good place
to start (re)learning linux, given my intention to use
the linux environment first and foremost as a daw?
the last time i ran linux i was 16, and only barely
able to "run" it successfuly. i remember _very_
little of it at this point. but i'm a reasonably
quick study, and i'm pretty motivated to learn it and
make it work.
any input would be welcomed and appreciated. my
apologies if this is a question that gets fielded
regularly; that being the case, a reference to an old
thread or a faq would be great.
thanks,
charles
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Hi Everyone,
I am editing a radio programme on ardour and the whole project has to be
delivered on DAT (Tape)format to the Radio station. As I am using a lot
of music made by myself and other friends the music and a lot of 'field
recordings ' that are on cd format(16 bit, 44Khz Audio). I am using
'Soundblaster Creative Audigy ZS'. Now there are a few issues/points
that were coming up regarding resampling, recoring on DAT etc.
1. Now a lot of field recordings and Music in on Cd (16bit ,44Khz)
format. And I am working with 48Khz ,16bit on the jackd(deamon) and on
ardour. Now if I oversample/ ‘resample at a higher rate’ in ardour by
importing it in the 'Auditions' region i.e. basically from 44Khz to
48Khz. Will I loose out on quality. Is the Ardour re-sampler good enough
to handle this conversion.
2. Or, should I work with 16bit-44Khz setting (on jackd/Ardour) and
export the final mixed session once finished to 16bit-48Khz(DAT) . So I
can take the dump of the final session on DAT tapes. Will this way be
better than the point(1) above in which all the audio is individually
re-sampled at
3. I have a 'Tascam DA-P 1' DAT recorder on which I have to dump the
final edit. So how do I go about this. Should I play the audio in Ardour
only and the send it to the DAT recorder. Or should i play the exported
file in a player like Alsaplayer/ Audacity(which plays audio rec at
48Khz ‘?’) and then take the dump through SPDIF out into the DAT
recorder. Is this possible to do the above mentioned process(s) any
other way, which might be better.
Basically Im dealing with a lot of audio at 44KHz which has to mixed
together and the final output will be on 48Khz(DAT Tape). What could be
the best way to deal with it so that there is no or very little loss in
quality. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks a lot
ISh
(frEeMuZik.net/sarai.net)
Hi,
If I set the volume faders, mute buttons, etc in Envy24control, it
remembers those settings if I quit the app and restart it and even if I
log out and back in and rerun it.
But if I reboot, all the Envy24control settings go back to their
defaults.
Where are those settings saved when I quit and restart or log out/in and
why do they go away on a reboot?
Puzzled (as usual)... 8^)
Thanks,
Mike
Mike Jewell
I see that there is no facility in Rosegarden to export audio. That's
too bad because this is an important feature for me.
What have you done to export audio in rg?
Timemachine doesn't seem to be a good solution because it outputs to
w64. That adds yet another process to fool with (the process to convert
from w64 to ?). I also tried ReZound, thru jack, but it always wants you
to start a new file to record -- maybe there's a way around that. I'll
look. I haven't seen that Audacity has been made jack aware... or has it
been added?
I'm curious to understand what others have done.
On a related note:: I have a 1.8M P4 and when I play back a file in rg
and record in ReZound i get xruns thru jack. I'm running FC3 with the
2.6.12-0.21.rdt.rhfc3.ccrma kernel. All apps seem to be running pretty
well (pd, snd, etc.) But, adding this extra bit of processing seemed to
tip the scale. Should it? I wouldn't think that it should. Where can I
look to focus on the problem?
--
Brad Fuller
(408) 799-6124
** Sonaural Audio Studios **
(408) 799-6123 West San Jose
(408) 799-6124 Cambrian
________________________________
Hear us online: www.Sonaural.com
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:36:18 -0400
> From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <rzewnickie(a)rfa.org>
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Music
> To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu>
> Message-ID: <20050719223618.GB22643(a)rfa.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > I have some tracks dating back a few years at Vitaminic - no solo
> > piano work, but a variety of instrumental/electronic tracks ranging
> > in style from easy listening to experimental. I hope you enjoy them
> > (or at least those you choose to hear). These tracks can be found
> > here: http://stage.vitaminic.co.uk/main/gavin_stevens/all_tracks/
>
> How do you like vitaminic? I used to have a page at iuma before they
> were merged with/bought by vitaminic. (hope I have my history correct
> on that... I also had an mp3.com page for a while ...)
Hi Eric,
On the grounds that Vitaminic are still going & have kept my music on
their site, I quite like them. I also have a page at IUMA (your history
is correct as far as I can remember).
I shall be able to give a more up to date appraisal when I try to upload
some new tracks in the near future (still working on them as I write
this).
I would say that both Vitaminic & IUMA are worth a try.
Gavin.
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:13:33 -0700
Brad Fuller <brad(a)sonaural.com> wrote:
> Timemachine doesn't seem to be a good solution because it outputs to
> w64. That adds yet another process to fool with (the process to convert
> from w64 to ?). I also tried ReZound, thru jack, but it always wants you
> to start a new file to record -- maybe there's a way around that. I'll
> look. I haven't seen that Audacity has been made jack aware... or has it
> been added?
timemachine -f wav
might do what you want. See
timemachine --help
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://affenbande.org/~tapas/
Very new to sound input and linux. I've listened to music on linux
but recording and manipulating sound is all new to me. I'm just
going to put into words what I'd like to do and take it from there. I
have an electric guitar and I'd like to record riffs and then apply
software filters (right word? maybe software effects?) to the riffs
to give them a different sound. I'd like to be able to edit them,
save them and record them to disc (cd/dvd). I'd also like to be able
to record singing and sound effects. I have read the archives a bit
and I saw a July thread about hardware but the original poster had his
thread hijacked and it went a little astray.
I know there are a few hardware vendors who's products work well on
linux. But I'm trying to get some solid advice from folks who are
using hardware to do what I want to do.
Do I need one box or several? I don't want to spend a lot to start
but would like to have something that's made reasonably well. If I
have to put together my setup over time then that's what I'll do so I
don't have to layout a big chunk of money at the start. So maybe
first I'll get the guitar connected and then later get the mic and get
it connected. Then next get recording device(s). And so on, to
build a complete system over time but still get quality components as
I go so that in the end I have an all-around quality system.
My concerns are compatibility with linux and the software that runs on
linux. Compatibility amongst the different components and
compatibility with the popular storage mediums. i.e. cd/dvd
Over time I would be willing to spend $1000-2000 for something that
will last and do a good job for me. But I don't want to spend it all
now.
Thanks,
Richard
Hello,
I'd like a simple keyboard for plonking out notes to help me learn my
choral music. First, I'd like a piece of software that accomplishes
this by using my usual PC keyboard. Second, I'd like actual keyboard
hardware that can operate by itself, or connected to a computer
through either USB or MIDI (preferably both). I don't want any
extraneous features on the keyboard, although I'd be interested in
hearing what features people find particularly useful. Velocity
sensitive keys that feel like a piano to some degree would be a major
plus, but that mostly depends on the difference in price. Any
suggestions?
Cheers!
Shaun
ahoi!
eisenkraut is a supercollider based sound file editor.
it's free and cross platform. version 0.3 has been
uploaded which (as far as i can determine) works quite
well for standard editing sessions. people who like to
co-develop are welcome.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/eisenkraut
ciao, -sciss-
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de