Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:50:09PM +0200, schoappied wrote:
>
>
>> I've bought a m-audio audiophile 24/96 and a mic shure sm 58 beta
>> (thanks for your advices ;) ).
>>
>> I also have a epiphone les paul elekt. guitar with a orange crush 30 r
>> amplifier.
>>
>> Now I want to be able to record voice and guitar, so I need a preamp...
>> (or a mixer, if that's better)
>>
>
> You should be able to run the line out of the amp directly into one
> of the inputs on your new sound card (with a 1/4" to RCA cable, of
> course).
>
> Your other option is to mic the amp, but then you'd only be able to
> record singing or guitar, not both at once.
>
> Of course, if you try to do both at once, you are likely to get a lot of
> amp bleed into your vocal mic, unless you have some good way to isolate
> the two. Bleed isn't always a problem though.
>
>
>> What about the alternative in this area?
>>
>> - audio buddy: http://www.thomann.de/nl/m-audio_audio_buddy.htm
>>
>
> Those get a lot of bad reviews.
>
>
>> - Studio Projects VTB1 : http://www.thomann.de/nl/studio_projects_vtb1.htm
>>
>
> That looks promising.
>
>
And what about the presonus firebox?
http://www.thomann.de/nl/presonus_firebox.htm
Hello.
I often run the PA system for my CU at uni. So far we've been using
jack-jack leads to connect guitars to the desk. However, my Dad has
recently started using jack-XLR leads at my home church and says that
it's much better.
After a very long conversation and lots of googling (which incidentally
provides no info at all on the subject), I'm now completely confused.
Are guitars mic or line or what?
The rationale for using jack-XLR leads and connecting to the mic input
on the desk is that guitars have mics in them so they are mic level.
Apparently the battery unit in the guitar doesn't make it line level,
but I'm not convinced.
The other thing I don't understand is that if that is the case, why do
people use DI boxes? A DI box takes a high impedance (line level - I
think) input and converts it to low impedance output (mic level). If the
guitar is mic level already then what's the point?
Please, could someone shed some light on this because I'm now very confused.
Thanks in advance.
Simon
Joshua Boyd wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:11:05PM +0200, schoappied wrote:
>
>> And what about the combination with a audiophile 24/96 pci and a little
>> mackie mixer like this one? http://www.thomann.de/nl/mackie_402_vlz3.htm
>>
>> How does this compare to for example a delta 1010lt or a firewire interface?
>>
>
> If all you want is 2 in and out with mic pres, I would say that is a
> fair way to go.
>
> If you buy this mixer, you may find yourself wanting a slightly better
> on though. If you use the mixer strictly for mic pre-amps, then it is
> fine.
>
> If you are willing to consider Behringer brand (some people hate them),
> you could get a bit more mixer for a bit less money from that web wite
> with the XENYX 802. The Soundcraft Classic 4 also looks better, and
> that is a great brand. I haven't used either of these specific mixers
> though.
>
> Personally, I have an 10 channel Yamaha unit, which is about $20 more
> than the Mackie you mention, but I believe that mine has been
> discontinued. I would have gone for the Behringer, but I put off buying
> anything until I needed it the next day and the Yamaha was what I could
> find locally.
>
>
>
Do you mean the soundcraft compact?
http://www.thomann.de/nl/soundcraft_compact_4.htm
And the Yamaha mg 102 http://www.thomann.de/nl/yamaha_mg_102_c.htm ?
Hello,
Does anyone know link with soundfonts with good quality orchestar
instruments (piano, strings, flute etc.)
I am trying FluidSynth, but it is rather thin, I guess.
Thanks,
vedran
Hey Guys,
I have a Fender Hot Rod Deluxe guitar amp and noticed there is an preamp out
for an effects loops. I was wondering if there were any other uses for this?
Would the output on this suitable to bypass the preamp on my audio
interface? Would this tube preamp stage be of any benefit? Could I hook up
an SM57 to the amp input to be sent to the interface?
Thanks
Hi,
I want to be able to record voice and acc. guitar.
I like to have it cheap, but good... ;)
1. Which mic do you recommend?
2. Do I need a mixer?
If yes, which one is good, or which brand?
Do I need digital effects?
What are other important things?
3. Do I need a new soundcard? I've now an onboard one and can play
guitar with not to much latency or xruns...
Thanks in advance,
Dirk
"After following the thread here about laptop survival rates live, I've decided to roll my own ruggedized embedded softsynth box:
http://www.restivo.org/blog/archives/a-more-portable-setup
"
Looking fwd to progress reports (and photos?) Ken.
Norv
Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.
www.yahoo7.com.au/mail
----Original Message-----
>From: Lars Luthman <lars.luthman(a)gmail.com>
>Sent: May 27, 2008 3:54 PM
>To: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
>Subject: Re: [LAU] which laptop?
>
>On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 21:36 +0200, Peter O'Doherty wrote:
>> I'm fairly new to linux (I mostly use Mac OS X) and would mainly use
>> the laptop for live audio work (running primarily PD and
>> SuperCollider).
>>
>> Does anyone have any experience with the 1525? Any advice?
>
>It's Intel based, which probably means Intel HDA for audio, which
>typically means poor DAC and unpredictable realtime performance. You'll
>probably want to get an external soundcard of some kind.
>
>
>--ll
I have an Asus with hda-intel sound and run Ubuntu Studio and Dragon NaturallySpeaking using Wine. Audio within the range of the human voice needs to be crystal-clear.
It's not.
In alsa-mixer I have to nudge mic-boost 2/3 of the way up to get moderately successful results.
When I try to listen to Youtube, the sound is so faint as to be unhearable.
The best laptop soundcard that I know of is the Indigo IO PCMCIA, but my computer has one of those newfangled card slots, and so I had to go with a Creative SoundBlaster X-Fi. But wait! The X-Fi isn't supported yet by alsa, although it will be soon. (The beta drivers so far haven't worked for me.)
There are bug reports all over Ubuntu about how poorly hda-intel works.
They won't be fixed until Intrepid, but maybe you won't buy your computer until then...
Does anyone have any sympathy for me?
S
I know I have seen this hased a few times... but never seen an answer.
Occasionally something grabs the ALSA sound driver and doesn't let go; I
don't appear to have any applications that are using audio open, yet I still
get this message:
r@pal: ~$ aplay flugel.wav
ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
aplay: main:545: audio open error: Device or resource busy
So why isn't there a way to find what has tied up the audio device? If
there is, great, now I can move on.
I know multiple devices are supposed to be able to use the ALSA device at
the same time, but I assume that older applications weren't implemented to
take advantage of this feature, which is why I am receiving this error, no?
I have always wondered about this; wikipedia says one of ALSA's main goals
is "graceful handling of multiple sound devices in a system", but I have
never known this to be the case.
Time to restart my computer so I can use audio again..
regards,
Rich
Hi,
I've noticed many posts on the list quoting ohm, K and other figures when
refering to analog signals. Its making me realize that I know next to
nothing about what's going though my wires as I record or patch. I do know
about Hi-Z guitar connections, balanced connections, etc.. but just the
basics not the specific details.
The same thing goes for USB/Firewire/PCI interfaces. I keep on hearing terms
like Bus Mastering and how USB devices have higher latency. I'd like to
understand what these are and why this is.
Does anybody know of a good online guide to walk me though all of this and
explain the specifics and how it applies to audio. Google has not yield any
good results.
Thanks
-Chris
