Linux-audio-user

linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

5 participants
20711 discussions

RE: [Just Talk] Re: [linux-audio-user] Why we need graphic designers

by linuxmedia4＠netscape.net

Alexandre Prokoudine <avp(a)altlinux.ru> wrote: > >http://www.applied-acoustics.com/images/tassman3_big.jpg > >is good too :) Yea, I agree. But still nothing that gimp couldn't handle. Rocco __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

23 years, 1 month

RE: [linux-audio-user] Why we need graphic designers

by linuxmedia4＠netscape.net

Steve Harris <S.W.Harris(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >http://www.applied-acoustics.com/tassman.htm > >Bugger Free Software, if they port this think to Linux they can have my 400 >EuroBucks. > >Even thier module routing display is attractive and easy to read: >http://www.applied-acoustics.com/images/builderscreen_big.jpg I'm not sure how the interface is superior to a lot of linux programs I've used. And I'm taken interest in you post because I have spent some time with gimp when I got into my web site management class. I would be open to helping with graphics if anyone wants to talk to me about a project that need graphics. Rocco __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

23 years, 1 month

Re: [linux-audio-user] The missing link

by linuxmedia4＠netscape.net

Chris Cannam <cannam(a)all-day-breakfast.com> wrote: >linuxmedia4(a)netscape.net wrote: >> I was learning Rosegarden (according to the installer notes it's >> version 2.1pl3-257) [...] I probly have an old version of >> Rosegarden (although I have the latest SuSE). > >It's not so much that you have an old version, as that you have >a rather different program altogether. > >Generally when anyone on this list refers to Rosegarden they're >likely to be talking about Rosegarden-4, which is a newer and far >more sophisticated application that doesn't even have much code in >common with Rosegarden-2.1. <CHOP-CHOP> >but it should compile out-of-the-box on SuSE 8.1 (the majority of >core Rosegarden developers use SuSE). Being (still somewhat) new to all this, I'm not sure if this is off limits. But I will take a chance. I want to say that SuSE has proven to be a really exellent distrob for Multimedia. And it has consistantly delivered what it promises (when you install a program, it useually works right). Any problems I've had running programs have come from lack of experience. Did I just start a Religious war with that statement? > You may need to install >the odd extra package but nothing that isn't on the SuSE CDs. <CHOP-CHOP> Great information. I guess you've helped "soften me up" about the biggest part of trying out new (or newer versions of) programs (the compiling headeachs). I'm sure I will eventually download it and get it going. I have so many other progams that I'm trying out right now though. Thanks, Rocco __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

23 years, 1 month

[linux-audio-user] Is there interrest in a (near) perfect piano for tiMIDIty for composing music ?

by Roel de Wit

Hi, Currently we are working on a cross-platform and multi format commercial GM/GS soundset named Project Portability (code-name).. We're also going to release an extremly realistic grand piano soundfont for Audigy (2) soundcards.. Currently we are determining whether or not to make a special tiMIDIty version. So I'd like to know if there interrest in the Linux community for such a product ? Details of the soon to be ready v0.2 beta version (Audigy (2) only under Windows at the moment): - Between 180 and 220 MB of 48 Khz 16 bit stereo samples sampled from a real piano. These are samples of 5 velocity layers of the piano. - 127 velocity layers. - Perfectly natural piano behaviour and sound. Some MP3 recordings of the v0.1 release can be found at http://project-portability.foad.nl .. These are dry (no reverb) recordings without any post-processing applied to them.. Any comments would be appreciated. --- Roel / Utopia Sound Division http://www.utopiasd.com

23 years, 1 month

[linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] sooperlooper goes PD

by Jesse Chappell

jfm3 wrote on Wed, 22-Jan-2003: > IMHO, a fancy GUI for a real time effect like this one is a bit of a > wasted effort. You typically use this thing from your geetar and a pedal > board that sends program change messages. I tend to agree with jfm3 here... the EDP featureset and interface was pretty much designed expressly for realtime live use. Other looping paradigms might be more powerful and appropriate for computer UI interaction and sequencing... and I'm sure one of us will get something jacked into Ardour eventually :) On another note -- if anyone gets sooperlooper (via PD or anything else) working on a Mac, let me know because Matthias Grob (the designer of the original EDP) has expressed interest in using it. jlc

23 years, 1 month

Re: [linux-audio-user] Is there interrest in a (near) perfect piano for tiMIDIty for composing music ?

by Roel de Wit

Hi Paul, > > Details of the soon to be ready v0.2 beta version (Audigy (2) only under > > Windows at the moment): > > - Between 180 and 220 MB of 48 Khz 16 bit stereo samples sampled from a real > > piano. These are samples of 5 velocity layers of the piano. > > - 127 velocity layers. > > - Perfectly natural piano behaviour and sound. > > Some MP3 recordings of the v0.1 release can be found at > > http://project-portability.foad.nl .. These are dry (no reverb) recordings > > without any post-processing applied to them.. Any comments would be > > appreciated. > They're pretty nice recordings. > What do you anticipate the price to be? Between 25 and 35 US$.. It won't be released before it's perfect though and several pianists are currently assisting me in the getting it as close as possible to the real thing. The Audigy/Audigy2 version for windows will be done first. After than a tiMIDIty version 'might' be made together with the VSampler 3 version. What I've currently interrested in is if there is any interrest for such a product for use under Linux.. --- Roel / Utopia Sound Division http://www.utopiasd.com

23 years, 1 month

[linux-audio-user] Rhodes sound

by Patrick Shirkey

Anyone know how I can emulate a rhodes using the computer keyboard? A mix I'm working on really needs some hearty organ. -- Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd. For the discerning hardware connoisseur Http://www.boosthardware.com Http://www.djcj.org - The Linux Audio Users guide ======================================== Being on stage with the band in front of crowds shouting, "Get off! No! We want normal music!", I think that was more like acting than anything I've ever done. Goldie, 8 Nov, 2002 The Scotsman

23 years, 1 month

Re: [linux-audio-user] The missing link

by linuxmedia4＠netscape.net

Daniel James <daniel(a)mondodesigno.com> wrote: >> If you're using a soundblaster style card I think you can set the record >> input to MIDI and just record a stereo wav file > > I asked the question the other day - with an SB Live, run alsamixer and > toggle capture on the fader titled 'music' with the space bar. This > should enable you to record the internal synth via /dev/dsp Many thanks to both of you. This has opened up tons of flexibility and usefulness that I didn't expect. Rocco __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

23 years, 1 month

Re: [linux-audio-user] The missing link

by linuxmedia4＠netscape.net

Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com> wrote: > I think you've encountered the reason for jack. >From what I've been reading on this list for the last 6 months, it sounds great. I just want to learn a bunch of basic programs first (sequencers, multitrackers, alsa...) to see what they all offer. Then I'll tackle jack. So far I'm discovering some pretty powerful tools. I don't like to sorta/kind know a program and I think jack will divert me from the time I'm putting into really get to know some basic programs first. I've just so bogged down with trying to understand most of the program's docs that I'm just not prepared to learn jack right now. > Why not try using Rosegarden or Muse to play the sequences > then you can interface directly to jack? I was learning Rosegarden (according to the installer notes it's version 2.1pl3-257) but it kept crashing. Even if it was stable, it's not very (musically) intuitive. The only way to edit notes is by numbers. It just didn't seem to have anything special about it. Expecially compared to jazz's graphical editing and live "real" insturment recording capabilities. And I'm still reading the Doc on jazz. I probly have an old version of Rosegarden (although I have the latest SuSE). Some of the things I've heard about newer versions of Rosegarden sounds promising. But with all the energy that goes into really getting to know the details of all these programs, I just don't want to deal with (possible) compiling problems. SuSE's put together a good set of diverse music programs that work immediatly apon installing them. I'm going to wait till I have the time to work out possible compiling problems that come with getting the newer versions. I just tried out muse today. It looks very promising. But this is what I encontered. I would appreciate if you could offer any information on how to solve this. I loaded a midi file that plays on every midi player/sequencer I've used. And I also did the "quick start" But I couldn't get any sound out of it and it didn't seem to input any notes from my midi keyboard. I have kaconnect set like this: External MIDI 0 ---> Emu10K1 Wave Table ---> Muse Sequencer Muse Sequencer ---> Emu10K Wave Table I was unable to load any instruments in the track info window. It just shows ---> ??? I tried all the different "Song Types". I'm too new at this to know what "NO" "GM" "GS" and "XG" are so I tried each one and it didn't seem to have any affect. I'm looking forward to trying out Muse. Any help would be appreciated... Rocco __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

23 years, 1 month

Re: [linux-audio-user] The missing link

by linuxmedia4＠netscape.net

>linuxmedia4(a)netscape.net wrote: > Is there a program that converts .sf2 to .pat. If so, then when I >> play midi files with timidity, they will sound like what I created with >> jazz. Frank Barknecht <fbar(a)footils.org> wrote: >If I understand you correctly, then you are using in Jazz the >SF2-midisynth of your soundcard (a Soundblaster probably) and you like >the results, but when you record, you don't record your soundcards >output but what timidity renders, right? Exactly... >So basically you don't like the rendering of timimidity, but you like >the rendering of your soundcard. There are several ways to solve this, >but "Jack" isn't necessary for this. > >* Record your soundcard's output. This may need a second soundcard >or external recording gear. Upon another person's suggestion, I have been using alsamixer's ability to "capture" _anything_. What a great tool this has been. I have done things like (not only) recorded my softsynth right into ecasound, but also added sound effects. This has the advantage of being able to hear the echo in my headphones but not recording them to the file (so I can add effects when I do the final mix). I was suprized at some of the things that it allowed. I was able to get better control over ecasound effects for one. I couldn't really get deep sounding delays until I disovered the ability to raise that channel in alsamixer. I've used those capibility along with the few program (compared to how many are out there) to do some pretty cool things. I was even able to record my softsynth into jazz (jazz has live recording cabilities) and even turn each midi track into a wav file that I then put into ecasound to record real instruments. I'm sure I can capture ecasounds effects into jazz and be able to record live instruments with effects. But this is not as versitile as being able to capture each midi track and put it all in ecasound and get much better control and quality over the sound. >* Use a software soundfont synthesizer. I think, timidity can also use >soundfonts, but personally I use iiwusynth. This would work with >your current setup, because you can configure ecasound to use another >synth in ~/.ecasoundrc at: > ext-timidity-cmd = timidity -Or1S -id -s %s -o - %f >This can be replaced with your favorite synth. I tried that with pmidi and playmidi and it worked, but it wouldn't let me record _anything_ to a file. I may have completly gone in a different direction with being able to record midi tracks, capturing them to wav and putting them into ecasound. Even with Timidity I couldn't fast forward while in ecasound. It just jumps to the beginning. But you never know when there's a combination of programs that do what no other seem to do. I will keep trying different seqencers with ecasound. >* Use another sequencer. This is basically the same a solution two, > but for example MusE comes with iiwusynth build in. I'm Looking forward to trying Muse. I beleive from what I read, it will do live recording also. And appearently, form what I've discovered in the last few days, I'm probly going to be able to use any softsynth along with it. Thanks for all your help Rocco __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

23 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-user